-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.00728167 = product of:
0.0728167 = sum of:
0.0728167 = product of:
0.10922505 = sum of:
0.07597528 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07597528 = score(doc=3726,freq=3.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.51779115 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033249777 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Year
- 2010
-
Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010)
0.00
0.0032694556 = product of:
0.032694556 = sum of:
0.032694556 = product of:
0.09808366 = sum of:
0.09808366 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09808366 = score(doc=4057,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.6684655 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
- Year
- 2010
-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.00
0.0027708148 = product of:
0.027708147 = sum of:
0.027708147 = product of:
0.08312444 = sum of:
0.08312444 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08312444 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.00
0.0027708148 = product of:
0.027708147 = sum of:
0.027708147 = product of:
0.08312444 = sum of:
0.08312444 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08312444 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.00
0.0027708148 = product of:
0.027708147 = sum of:
0.027708147 = product of:
0.08312444 = sum of:
0.08312444 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08312444 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.00
0.0019395702 = product of:
0.019395702 = sum of:
0.019395702 = product of:
0.058187105 = sum of:
0.058187105 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058187105 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.00
0.0013854074 = product of:
0.013854073 = sum of:
0.013854073 = product of:
0.04156222 = sum of:
0.04156222 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156222 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995)
0.00
0.0010176711 = product of:
0.010176711 = sum of:
0.010176711 = product of:
0.03053013 = sum of:
0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03053013 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kompatibilität und Integration : Probleme und Lösungen in der Wissensorganisation (2008)
0.00
0.0010176711 = product of:
0.010176711 = sum of:
0.010176711 = product of:
0.03053013 = sum of:
0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03053013 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- The trend in the fifties and sixties of the past century away from the use of universal classification systems such as the UDC towards establishing thesauri in special subject fields for the description of the conceptual contents of documents lead documentalists soon to realize that the necessary common tool for a collaboration among centers of similar subject fields was lacking. Therefore compatibility and integration studies began between the different thesauri of such fields, leading often to more comprehensive thesauri, such as macrothesauri. The paper describes this historic development and also the solutions found at the 1995 ISKO-Conference in Warsaw/Poland on Compatibility and Integration as given in its papers, its recommendations and also in the conceptual frame of its comprehensive bibliography on this topic. In conclusion a new solution is presented oriented toward combining the use of a universal classification system with the new developments of ontologies and their problem of interoperability and heterogeneity.
-
De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014)
0.00
9.79631E-4 = product of:
0.009796309 = sum of:
0.009796309 = product of:
0.029388927 = sum of:
0.029388927 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029388927 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:01:18
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften : Evaluation einer Herausforderung (2006)
0.00
9.179433E-4 = product of:
0.009179433 = sum of:
0.009179433 = product of:
0.027538298 = sum of:
0.027538298 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027538298 = score(doc=3128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.1991816 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Aufgrund eines Vortrags über Begriffs- und Definitionstheorie, den ich bei der Tagung über Begriffsanalyse in Darmstadt 1986 gehalten hatte (Dahlberg 1987), wandte sich der damalige Mitherausgeber der Zeitschrift Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, Dr. Rainer Greshoff, 1990 an mich mit der Bitte, einen ähnlichen Beitrag als Hauptartikel für seine Zeitschrift zu schreiben. Ich sagte zu mit der Absicht im Hinterkopf, dabei auch meine Erfahrungen mit der sozial-wissenschaftlichen Terminologie, die ich bei COCTA, dem Committee for Conceptual and Terminological Analysis (Vorsitz Prof. Dr. Fred Riggs, Hawaii) (Riggs 1982) gemacht hatte, einzubringen. Hinzu kam, dass mir gerade zu diesem Zeitpunkt das Werk von Stefan Andreski in die Hände gefallen war, betitelt: "Die Hexenmeister der Sozialwissenschaften. Missbrauch, Mode und Manipulation einer Wissenschaft", (Andreski 1974) der sozusagen "kein Blatt vor den Mund nimmt" und überaus mutig und an vielen Beispielen die Misere der sozialwissenschaftlichen Terminologie offenbar macht. Ich hoffte daher, in einem entsprechenden Beitrag mehr Bewusstsein für eine begriffsorientierte, systematische Terminologie der Sozialwissenschaften zu wecken. In gewisser Weise war für mich dabei die Lösung von Prof. Riggs mit seiner "Onomantik" (Riggs 1985) vorbildlich. Er ging nämlich davon aus, dass der sog. semasiologische Ansatz, bei dem nach der Bedeutung eines Wortes gefragt wird, unbrauchbar für sein Verständnis sei (und das nicht nur in den Sozialwissenschaften), man müsse vielmehr umgekehrt onomasiologisch vorgehen und sich zunächst über einen Begriff klar werden, der mit einem Wort (oder einem Wort in einem Kontext) verbunden ist und seine mögliche Definition finden und dann erst dafür eine Benennung suchen. Aus Zeitmangel entstand mein Beitrag erst 1995. Herr Dr. Greshoff konnte - entsprechend der Methode seiner Zeitschrift - zu meinem Beitrag eine größere Anzahl von Kritikern finden und diese dann auch noch durch eine Replik der Autorin erwidern lassen und mit einer Metakritik eines Nichtinvolvierten das Ganze beenden. In meinem Fall waren es 27 Persönlichkeiten aus 10 verschiedenen Disziplinen und Herr Prof. Dr. Endruweit als Metakritiker. Der Beitrag umfasste die Seiten 3-91 (DIN A4 Format) in Heft 1-1996 unter dem Titel "Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften. Lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?" (Dahlberg 1996). Ich war überzeugt, dass sich ihre Probleme mit meiner vorgeschlagenen Methode lösen lassen. Doch meine Kritiker waren es leider nicht. Und über das Warum - davon wird mein Vortrag heute handeln.
-
Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014)
0.00
8.3124434E-4 = product of:
0.008312443 = sum of:
0.008312443 = product of:
0.02493733 = sum of:
0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02493733 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:00:13
