Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic control (1990) 0.00

0.0044969856 = product of:
  0.044969853 = sum of:
    0.044969853 = product of:
      0.13490956 = sum of:
        0.13490956 = weight(_text_:1990 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13490956 = score(doc=461,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.97578657 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Year: 1990

Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990) 0.00

0.003934862 = product of:
  0.03934862 = sum of:
    0.03934862 = product of:
      0.11804586 = sum of:
        0.11804586 = weight(_text_:1990 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11804586 = score(doc=2404,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.85381323 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Year: 1990

Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.00

0.003934862 = product of:
  0.03934862 = sum of:
    0.03934862 = product of:
      0.11804586 = sum of:
        0.11804586 = weight(_text_:1990 in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11804586 = score(doc=1271,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.85381323 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Year: 1990

Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990) 0.00

0.0029027916 = product of:
  0.029027916 = sum of:
    0.029027916 = product of:
      0.08708375 = sum of:
        0.08708375 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08708375 = score(doc=3569,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.62986755 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.254-263
Year: 1990

Svenonius, E.: Good indexing : a question of evidence (1975) 0.00
```
0.0014247395 = product of:
  0.014247394 = sum of:
    0.014247394 = product of:
      0.04274218 = sum of:
        0.04274218 = weight(_text_:problem in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04274218 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
```
Abstract

Different types of eveidence used in answering the question: what is good indexing? are considered. The evidence is presented in the context of the method on inquiry which produced mysticism, rationalism or empiricism. The method of mysticism is illustrated with reference to Cutter and the problem of specific entry. Ranganathan's approach to the controversy over alphabetical vs. classified arrangement is used to illustrate the method of rationalism. Cleverdon's work is taken as an example of the method of empiricism. In providing evidence for good indexing, the method of empiricism is found wanting. It is suggested that the method be improved by fundamental research into problems of sampling and definition, and that it be supplementend by other methods of inquiry
Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.00
```
0.0014247395 = product of:
  0.014247394 = sum of:
    0.014247394 = product of:
      0.04274218 = sum of:
        0.04274218 = weight(_text_:problem in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04274218 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices
Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986) 0.00
```
0.0012212053 = product of:
  0.012212053 = sum of:
    0.012212053 = product of:
      0.03663616 = sum of:
        0.03663616 = weight(_text_:problem in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03663616 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
```
Abstract

The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes