Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0066932924 = product of:
  0.033466462 = sum of:
    0.008141369 = product of:
      0.024424106 = sum of:
        0.024424106 = weight(_text_:problem in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024424106 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.025325093 = product of:
      0.07597528 = sum of:
        0.07597528 = weight(_text_:2010 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07597528 = score(doc=584,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.51779115 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)

Abstract

Dieser Band versammelt die Beiträge einer Tagung, die im April 2010 in der Forschungsbibliothek Gotha stattgefunden hat. Ziel der Veranstaltung war es, nach dem zukünftigen Wert zu fragen, den Bibliotheken und Archive im Zeitalter der Virtualisierung behalten werden. Diesen immer weiter fortschreitenden Prozess treiben nicht nur diese Institutionen selbst, sondern auch mächtige Quasimonopole wie Google voran, ohne dass über die Implikationen hinreichend reflektiert würde. Zu fragen ist, ob zu den Folgen, die die Virtualisierung für Bibliotheken und Archive haben wird, auch ihre Selbstabschaffung als an Orten fassbare Einrichtungen gehört. Es ist aber auch damit zu rechnen, dass das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten und Denken seine Struktur verändern wird. Vor diesem Hintergrund unternimmt dieser Band eine Würdigung des Analogen und seines fortbestehenden Wertes im Zeitalter der Entmaterialisierung.

Content

Aus dem Inhalt: G. Siebeck: Die Vielfalt der Bibliotheken und die Produktion der Verlage - C. Heibach: Über das Problem des Vergessens im digitalen Zeitalter - U. Jochum: Die Selbstabschaffung der Bibliotheken - M. Knoche: Original oder digital? Die Rekonstruktion des verbrannten Buchbestandes in Weimar - B. Fischer: Von der "Handschrift" zum Digitalisat. Kehrseiten der Wissensgesellschaft - A. Schlechter: Archäologisches Objekt, Exemplar, Ensemble. Was bleibt vom alten Buch? - R. Reuß: Das Buch und seine Typographie in Zeiten der Hypnose.

RSWK

Bibliothek / Wandel / Digitalisierung / Kongress / Gotha <2010>
Bibliothek / Kulturerbe / Kulturgut / Kollektives Gedächtnis / Digitalisierung / Kongress / Gotha <2010> (BVB)

Subject

Bibliothek / Wandel / Digitalisierung / Kongress / Gotha <2010>
Bibliothek / Kulturerbe / Kulturgut / Kollektives Gedächtnis / Digitalisierung / Kongress / Gotha <2010> (BVB)

0.0012981679 = product of:
  0.012981678 = sum of:
    0.012981678 = product of:
      0.038945034 = sum of:
        0.038945034 = weight(_text_:1990 in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038945034 = score(doc=2575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.28168532 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

"British Librarianship and Information Work 1986-1990" continues a series which has run for more than 60 years. It began, in 1928 as the annual "Year's Work in Librarianship", changed from 1951 to "Five Years' Work in Librarianship" and, with the volume for 1966-1970, took on its present title. The series has established itself as an important record of professional activity and thought, through its comprehensive reviews of most aspects of information and library work. It is valuable to those who wish to keep up to date professionally, noting current developments and trends. It will be equally useful for those researchers and students who in the future need to look back historically on the events and achivements of each quinquennium. This issue follows closely the contents and style of its immediate predecessor "British librarianship and information Work 1981-1985", being in two volumes, one covering general libraries and the library information profession, and the other being concerned with special libraries, materials and processes. All the topics in the previous volume are included, except for the chapter on Buildings and Equipment, the contents of which have been incorporated into other chapters. All the contributors were asked to describe the last five years' major events and publications in their fields, and, generally, to limit their contributions to about 7,500 words, with no restriction on the number of bibliographical references. All authors were requested to tackle their subjects thoroughly while conforming to their own personal and individual styles. No attempt has been made to impose an overall editorial style, or to avoid the duplication which results from writers covering specific, but inevitably overlapping, areas of interest. Cross references have not been inserted in the text from chapter to chapter, where duplication occurs, but a detailed subject index provides for readers wishing to approach the review with an interest in any specific area or topic. A separate list of acronyms and abbreviations appears in each volume, representing all such entries identified in both volumes.

9.697851E-4 = product of:
  0.009697851 = sum of:
    0.009697851 = product of:
      0.029093552 = sum of:
        0.029093552 = weight(_text_:22 in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029093552 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Date

22. 2.2008 14:21:53

4.0706844E-4 = product of:
  0.0040706843 = sum of:
    0.0040706843 = product of:
      0.012212053 = sum of:
        0.012212053 = weight(_text_:problem in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012212053 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.09379075 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

That there is a "digital divide" - which falls between those who have and can afford the latest in technological tools and those who have neither in our society - is indisputable. "Virtual Inequality" redefines the issue as it explores the cascades of that divide, which involve access, skill, political participation, as well as the obvious economics. Computer and Internet access are insufficient without the skill to use the technology, and economic opportunity and political participation provide primary justification for realizing that this inequality is a public problem and not simply a matter of private misfortune. Defying those who say the divide is growing smaller, this volume, based on a national survey that includes data from over 1800 respondents in low-income communities, shows otherwise. In addition to demonstrating why disparities persist in such areas as technological abilities, the survey also shows that the digitally disadvantaged often share many of the same beliefs as their more privileged counterparts. African-Americans, for instance, are even more positive in their attitudes toward technology than whites are in many respects, contrary to conventional wisdom. The rigorous research on which the conclusions are based is presented accessibly and in an easy-to-follow manner. Not content with analysis alone, nor the untangling of the complexities of policymaking, "Virtual Inequality" views the digital divide compassionately in its human dimensions and recommends a set of practical and common-sense policy strategies. Inequality, even in a virtual form this book reminds us, is unacceptable and a situation that society is compelled to address.