-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.01
0.005805583 = product of:
0.058055833 = sum of:
0.058055833 = product of:
0.1741675 = sum of:
0.1741675 = weight(_text_:1990 in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1741675 = score(doc=6903,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.433-443
- Year
- 1990
-
Garfield, E.: How ISI selects journals for coverage : quantitative and qualitative considerations (1990)
0.01
0.005805583 = product of:
0.058055833 = sum of:
0.058055833 = product of:
0.1741675 = sum of:
0.1741675 = weight(_text_:1990 in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1741675 = score(doc=1153,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Current contents. 1990, no.21, S.5-13
- Year
- 1990
-
Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990)
0.01
0.0050798855 = product of:
0.050798856 = sum of:
0.050798856 = product of:
0.15239656 = sum of:
0.15239656 = weight(_text_:1990 in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15239656 = score(doc=338,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.1022682 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.444-452
- Year
- 1990
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.00
0.004416318 = product of:
0.044163182 = sum of:
0.044163182 = product of:
0.06624477 = sum of:
0.041307446 = weight(_text_:1990 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041307446 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.2987724 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02493733 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a study of uncited and seldom-cited influences (2010)
0.00
0.0032694556 = product of:
0.032694556 = sum of:
0.032694556 = product of:
0.09808366 = sum of:
0.09808366 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09808366 = score(doc=3308,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.6684655 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.1-12
- Year
- 2010
-
Hellqvist, B.: Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis (2010)
0.00
0.0028607734 = product of:
0.028607734 = sum of:
0.028607734 = product of:
0.0858232 = sum of:
0.0858232 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0858232 = score(doc=3329,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.5849073 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.310-318
- Year
- 2010
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Salah, A.A.A.: Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index : the journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus "digital humanities" as a topic (2010)
0.00
0.0024520915 = product of:
0.024520915 = sum of:
0.024520915 = product of:
0.07356274 = sum of:
0.07356274 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07356274 = score(doc=3436,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.5013491 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.787-801
- Year
- 2010
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.00
0.0022166518 = product of:
0.022166518 = sum of:
0.022166518 = product of:
0.06649955 = sum of:
0.06649955 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649955 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.00
0.0022166518 = product of:
0.022166518 = sum of:
0.022166518 = product of:
0.06649955 = sum of:
0.06649955 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649955 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013)
0.00
0.0021932174 = product of:
0.021932174 = sum of:
0.021932174 = product of:
0.06579652 = sum of:
0.06579652 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06579652 = score(doc=1015,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.4484203 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- This article provides an overview of studies that have used citation analysis in the field of humanities in the period 1951 to 2010. The work is based on an exhaustive search in databases-particularly those in library and information science-and on citation chaining from papers on citation analysis. The results confirm that use of this technique in the humanities is limited, and although there was some growth in the 1970s and 1980s, it has stagnated in the past 2 decades. Most of the work has been done by research staff, but almost one third involves library staff, and 15% has been done by students. The study also showed that less than one fourth of the works used a citation database such as the Arts & Humanities Citation Index and that 21% of the works were in publications other than library and information science journals. The United States has the greatest output, and English is by far the most frequently used language, and 13.9% of the studies are in other languages.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010)
0.00
0.0020434097 = product of:
0.020434096 = sum of:
0.020434096 = product of:
0.06130229 = sum of:
0.06130229 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06130229 = score(doc=3335,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.352-369
- Year
- 2010
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.00
0.0020434097 = product of:
0.020434096 = sum of:
0.020434096 = product of:
0.06130229 = sum of:
0.06130229 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06130229 = score(doc=3998,freq=5.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2061-20690
- Year
- 2010
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.00
0.001959262 = product of:
0.019592619 = sum of:
0.019592619 = product of:
0.058777854 = sum of:
0.058777854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058777854 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.00
0.0016282737 = product of:
0.016282737 = sum of:
0.016282737 = product of:
0.04884821 = sum of:
0.04884821 = weight(_text_:problem in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04884821 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.375163 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Predicting relevance of documents from citations is a common problem for information users. The study addresses the relevance prediction process and most specifically, what is viewed by the subject while using the citations. 2 kinds of protocols were collected while 11 subjects viewed 7 citations each. Eye fixations and eye movements between parts of citations were examined. Verbal reports from subjects during this process were used to explore the process of assessment
-
Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007)
0.00
0.0016227098 = product of:
0.016227098 = sum of:
0.016227098 = product of:
0.048681293 = sum of:
0.048681293 = weight(_text_:1990 in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048681293 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.35210666 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.00
0.0014621448 = product of:
0.014621448 = sum of:
0.014621448 = product of:
0.043864343 = sum of:
0.043864343 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043864343 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.29894686 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
-
Spasser, M.A.: ¬The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge (1997)
0.00
0.0014247395 = product of:
0.014247394 = sum of:
0.014247394 = product of:
0.04274218 = sum of:
0.04274218 = weight(_text_:problem in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04274218 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- In a series of articles, Don Swanson explores the problem of associating two or more literatures that are logically, or substantively, related, but bibliographically noninteractive. He has called these implicit links among published literatures undicovered public knowledge. This article explores the fate of Swanson's ideas, using citation content analysis both to determine which authors have utilized Swanson's ideas and to examine the uses to which they have been put. The results suggest that while Swanson has received significant attention from the library and information science community, his ideas have not been widely cited in biomedical disciplines, and, when cited, only with rhetorically dismissive qualifications that detracts from their facticity. These results are interpreted as a failed instance of interdisciplinarity communication, and several explanations of this failure are discussed
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.00
0.0013854074 = product of:
0.013854073 = sum of:
0.013854073 = product of:
0.04156222 = sum of:
0.04156222 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156222 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004)
0.00
0.0012212053 = product of:
0.012212053 = sum of:
0.012212053 = product of:
0.03663616 = sum of:
0.03663616 = weight(_text_:problem in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03663616 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- The Web is a huge source of information, and one of the main problems facing users is finding documents which correspond to their requirements. Apart from the problem of thematic relevance, the documents retrieved by search engines do not always meet the users' expectations. The document may be too general, or conversely too specialized, or of a different type from what the user is looking for, and so forth. We think that adding metadata to pages can considerably improve the process of searching for information an the Web. This article presents a possible typology for Web sites and pages, as weIl as a method for propagating metadata values, based an the study of the Web graph and more specifically the method of cocitation in this graph.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.00
0.0011755573 = product of:
0.011755573 = sum of:
0.011755573 = product of:
0.035266716 = sum of:
0.035266716 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035266716 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
