-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.01
0.005805583 = product of:
0.058055833 = sum of:
0.058055833 = product of:
0.1741675 = sum of:
0.1741675 = weight(_text_:1990 in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1741675 = score(doc=6903,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.433-443
- Year
- 1990
-
Garfield, E.: How ISI selects journals for coverage : quantitative and qualitative considerations (1990)
0.01
0.005805583 = product of:
0.058055833 = sum of:
0.058055833 = product of:
0.1741675 = sum of:
0.1741675 = weight(_text_:1990 in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1741675 = score(doc=1153,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Current contents. 1990, no.21, S.5-13
- Year
- 1990
-
Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990)
0.01
0.0050798855 = product of:
0.050798856 = sum of:
0.050798856 = product of:
0.15239656 = sum of:
0.15239656 = weight(_text_:1990 in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15239656 = score(doc=338,freq=5.0), product of:
0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
1.1022682 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.444-452
- Year
- 1990
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.00
0.0022166518 = product of:
0.022166518 = sum of:
0.022166518 = product of:
0.06649955 = sum of:
0.06649955 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649955 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.00
0.0016282737 = product of:
0.016282737 = sum of:
0.016282737 = product of:
0.04884821 = sum of:
0.04884821 = weight(_text_:problem in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04884821 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.375163 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Predicting relevance of documents from citations is a common problem for information users. The study addresses the relevance prediction process and most specifically, what is viewed by the subject while using the citations. 2 kinds of protocols were collected while 11 subjects viewed 7 citations each. Eye fixations and eye movements between parts of citations were examined. Verbal reports from subjects during this process were used to explore the process of assessment
-
Spasser, M.A.: ¬The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge (1997)
0.00
0.0014247395 = product of:
0.014247394 = sum of:
0.014247394 = product of:
0.04274218 = sum of:
0.04274218 = weight(_text_:problem in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04274218 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- In a series of articles, Don Swanson explores the problem of associating two or more literatures that are logically, or substantively, related, but bibliographically noninteractive. He has called these implicit links among published literatures undicovered public knowledge. This article explores the fate of Swanson's ideas, using citation content analysis both to determine which authors have utilized Swanson's ideas and to examine the uses to which they have been put. The results suggest that while Swanson has received significant attention from the library and information science community, his ideas have not been widely cited in biomedical disciplines, and, when cited, only with rhetorically dismissive qualifications that detracts from their facticity. These results are interpreted as a failed instance of interdisciplinarity communication, and several explanations of this failure are discussed
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.00
8.3124434E-4 = product of:
0.008312443 = sum of:
0.008312443 = product of:
0.02493733 = sum of:
0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02493733 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.00
8.3124434E-4 = product of:
0.008312443 = sum of:
0.008312443 = product of:
0.02493733 = sum of:
0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02493733 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03067635 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
