Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Rötzer, F.: Mit Neurotechniken werden sich Absichten, Gefühle und Entscheidungen manipulieren lassen (2017) 0.02 
    0.016198387 = product of:
  0.16198388 = sum of:
    0.16198388 = weight(_text_:neurowissenschaftler in 3989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16198388 = score(doc=3989,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25347564 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 3989, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3989)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Nach den KI- und den Robotikwissenschaftlern haben sich nun auch Neurowissenschaftler und -techniker sowie Ethiker und Mediziner in die Reihen der Experten eingereiht, die vor Entwicklungen aus ihrer Forschung warnen und letztlich die Gesellschaft bzw. die Politik auffordern, nicht alles einfach wild weiterlaufen zu lassen und auch zu finanzieren, sondern die Entwicklung zu steuern oder auch zu begrenzen. Verwiesen wird auf die großen Investitionen, die von der Privatwirtschaft wie von Kernel oder Elon Musk oder vom Staat mit der US Brain Initiative oder von der Darpa gemacht wurden und werden.
  2. Rötzer, F.: Grundlagen einer neurotechnologischen Ethik (1996) 0.01 
    0.0072540552 = product of:
  0.07254055 = sum of:
    0.07254055 = product of:
      0.21762164 = sum of:
        0.21762164 = weight(_text_:seele in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21762164 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22439323 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.96982265 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  3. Rötzer, F.; Metzinger, T.; Linke, D.B.; Emrich, H.: Entwurf für eine Ethik der Neurotechnologie (1996) 0.01 
    0.0072540552 = product of:
  0.07254055 = sum of:
    0.07254055 = product of:
      0.21762164 = sum of:
        0.21762164 = weight(_text_:seele in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21762164 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22439323 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.96982265 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  4. Metzinger, T.: Philosophische Stichworte zu einer Ethik der Neurowissenschaften und der Informatik (1996) 0.01 
    0.0072540552 = product of:
  0.07254055 = sum of:
    0.07254055 = product of:
      0.21762164 = sum of:
        0.21762164 = weight(_text_:seele in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21762164 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22439323 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.96982265 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  5. Golden, F.A.: ¬The ethics of reference service for the public librarian (1990) 0.00 
    0.0036284893 = product of:
  0.036284894 = sum of:
    0.036284894 = product of:
      0.10885468 = sum of:
        0.10885468 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10885468 = score(doc=3663,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.78733444 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1990, no.30, S.157-166
    Year
    1990
  6. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.00 
    0.0016282737 = product of:
  0.016282737 = sum of:
    0.016282737 = product of:
      0.04884821 = sum of:
        0.04884821 = weight(_text_:problem in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04884821 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.375163 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  7. Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system 0.00 
    0.0015508389 = product of:
  0.015508389 = sum of:
    0.015508389 = product of:
      0.046525165 = sum of:
        0.046525165 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046525165 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.31708103 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  8. Broughton, V.: ¬The respective roles of intellectual creativity and automation in representing diversity : human and machine generated bias (2019) 0.00 
    0.0014392043 = product of:
  0.0143920425 = sum of:
    0.0143920425 = product of:
      0.043176126 = sum of:
        0.043176126 = weight(_text_:problem in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043176126 = score(doc=5728,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.33160037 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    The paper traces the development of the discussion around ethical issues in artificial intelligence, and considers the way in which humans have affected the knowledge bases used in machine learning. The phenomenon of bias or discrimination in machine ethics is seen as inherited from humans, either through the use of biased data or through the semantics inherent in intellectually- built tools sourced by intelligent agents. The kind of biases observed in AI are compared with those identified in the field of knowledge organization, using religious adherents as an example of a community potentially marginalized by bias. A practical demonstration is given of apparent religious prejudice inherited from source material in a large database deployed widely in computational linguistics and automatic indexing. Methods to address the problem of bias are discussed, including the modelling of the moral process on neuroscientific understanding of brain function. The question is posed whether it is possible to model religious belief in a similar way, so that robots of the future may have both an ethical and a religious sense and themselves address the problem of prejudice.
  9. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.00 
    0.0012923657 = product of:
  0.012923657 = sum of:
    0.012923657 = product of:
      0.03877097 = sum of:
        0.03877097 = weight(_text_:2010 in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03877097 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
  10. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.00 
    0.0011083259 = product of:
  0.011083259 = sum of:
    0.011083259 = product of:
      0.033249777 = sum of:
        0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033249777 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  11. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.00 
    0.0011083259 = product of:
  0.011083259 = sum of:
    0.011083259 = product of:
      0.033249777 = sum of:
        0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033249777 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  12. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011083259 = product of:
  0.011083259 = sum of:
    0.011083259 = product of:
      0.033249777 = sum of:
        0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033249777 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  13. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.00 
    0.0011083259 = product of:
  0.011083259 = sum of:
    0.011083259 = product of:
      0.033249777 = sum of:
        0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033249777 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  14. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.00 
    0.0011083259 = product of:
  0.011083259 = sum of:
    0.011083259 = product of:
      0.033249777 = sum of:
        0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033249777 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  15. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010338926 = product of:
  0.010338926 = sum of:
    0.010338926 = product of:
      0.031016776 = sum of:
        0.031016776 = weight(_text_:2010 in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031016776 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.21138735 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Footnote
    Beiträge des sechsten Symposiums zur Medienethik der Stuttgarter Hochschule der Medien. Rez. in: ZfBB 57(2010) H.1, S.65-66 (W. Gödert)
  16. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010176711 = product of:
  0.010176711 = sum of:
    0.010176711 = product of:
      0.03053013 = sum of:
        0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03053013 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
  17. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00 
    9.697851E-4 = product of:
  0.009697851 = sum of:
    0.009697851 = product of:
      0.029093552 = sum of:
        0.029093552 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029093552 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  18. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00 
    9.697851E-4 = product of:
  0.009697851 = sum of:
    0.009697851 = product of:
      0.029093552 = sum of:
        0.029093552 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029093552 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  19. Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik (2004) 0.00 
    8.0320035E-4 = product of:
  0.008032003 = sum of:
    0.008032003 = product of:
      0.02409601 = sum of:
        0.02409601 = weight(_text_:1990 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02409601 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.1742839 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Informationsethik ist Ethik von und für Menschen, deren Verhalten und Werte sich allerdings immer mehr in der Infosphere, in den Informationsumgebungen, entwickeln. Diese wiederum werden immer mehr von dem geprägt, was Telemediatisierung aller, auch und gerade der intellektuellen Lebenswelten genannt werden kann, also die Durchdringung dieser Lebenswelten mit Informations-, Kommunikations-, und Multi-/Hypermedia-Technologien. Daher kann in einem ersten Zugriff Informationsethik bestimmt werden als ein offenes Ensemble von Aussagen über normatives Verhalten gegenüber Wissen und Information, das sich in fortschreitend telemediatisierten Lebenswelten und in der Auseinandersetzung mit den in bisherigen Lebenswelten gültigen Werten und normativen Verhalten entwickelt. Die Abhängigkeit von dem Telemediatisierungsprozess könnte dazu verleiten, Informationsethik mit Computerethik oder Netzethik gleichzusetzen. Nicht alles, was am Thema Computer ethisch relevant sein könnte, sollte die Informationsethik für sich reklamieren - so wie die Informationswissenschaft ja auch einen spezifischeren Begriff von Information hat als die Informatik (vgl. Kap. A 1). Informationsethik ist Ethik in elektronischen Räumen. Das klingt spektakulär, ist aber doch keine Cyberethik, keine Ethik von epers(ons) (electronic personas), durch die in der virtuellen Realität z.B. Rechte und Pflichten von intelligenten Informationsassistenten (Cyborgs, Bots, Agenten) geregelt werden könnten. Solche Rechte von epers, wie z.B. "epers' rights include those of privacy, autonomy and anonymity" wurden und werden durchaus formuliert, so in einer ACM-Konferenz zum Thema Ethics in the Computer Age von 1995. Referenziert werden konnte diese Cyber-/Eper-Ethik auf die drei Asimovschen Gesetze für Roboter, die sich aber letztlich, anders als die Cyborgs and anders als die den Menschen ablösenden Maschinen von Hans Moravec, noch nicht von ihren Schöp fern, den Menschen, emanzipieren durften, sondern, im Sinne der ersten beiden Asimovschen Roboter-Gesetze, sich an den Interessen der Menschen auszurichten hatten. Erst dann, wenn diesen Interessen Genüge geleistet ist, dürften die Roboter auch an sich denken und Rechte und Freiheiten für sich reklamieren. Für Martha M. Smith in ihrem Information-Ethics-Artikel aus dem 32. Band der Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) ist Informationsethik "concerned with the ethical conflicts and issues that arise in the use of information, information technologies, and information systems", und zwar will sie dabei vor allem professionelle Aspekte angesprochen sehen, nicht Fragen persönlicher Ethik. Letztere können wir hier im Jahr 2004 nicht mehr so deutlich ausgrenzen, zumal die Bereiche professioneller Fachinformation und informationeller Alltagswelten auf den Publikumsmärkten durch die Telemediatisierung, durch die Ubiquität des Internet ineinander übergehen. Der Universalisierung der Informationsethik haben auch die drei UNESCO-INFOethics-Konferenzen (1997, 1990 und 2000) Rechnung getragen, bei denen das Ethos der Informationsspezialisten nur am Rande eine Rolle spielte. Vielmehr spiegelten die INFOethics-Themen die ethischen (und - im Sinne einer auf Aristoteles bezogenen Trias - zugleich die politischen und ökonomischen) Herausforderungen der (globalen) Informationsgesellschaft wider - die UNESCO bevorzugt eher den Plural und Wissensgesellschaften
  20. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00 
    6.927037E-4 = product of:
  0.0069270367 = sum of:
    0.0069270367 = product of:
      0.02078111 = sum of:
        0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02078111 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 12
  • d 11
  • i 1

Types

  • a 22
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications