Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.01
    0.0076611177 = product of:
      0.076611176 = sum of:
        0.076611176 = product of:
          0.11491676 = sum of:
            0.0858232 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0858232 = score(doc=4227,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.5849073 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
            0.029093552 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029093552 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
    Year
    2010
  2. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.01
    0.0057215467 = product of:
      0.057215467 = sum of:
        0.057215467 = product of:
          0.1716464 = sum of:
            0.1716464 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1716464 = score(doc=1596,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                1.1698146 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.243-284
    Year
    2010
  3. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.00
    0.004551044 = product of:
      0.04551044 = sum of:
        0.04551044 = product of:
          0.06826566 = sum of:
            0.04748455 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748455 = score(doc=3739,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.32361948 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
            0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02078111 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Year
    2010
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.00
    0.0032694556 = product of:
      0.032694556 = sum of:
        0.032694556 = product of:
          0.09808366 = sum of:
            0.09808366 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808366 = score(doc=4057,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.6684655 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
    Year
    2010
  5. Broughton, V.: Concepts and terms in the faceted classification : the case of UDC (2010) 0.00
    0.0020434097 = product of:
      0.020434096 = sum of:
        0.020434096 = product of:
          0.06130229 = sum of:
            0.06130229 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06130229 = score(doc=4065,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.4, S.270-279
    Year
    2010
  6. Milonas, E.: ¬The use of facets in Web search engines 0.00
    0.001809312 = product of:
      0.01809312 = sum of:
        0.01809312 = product of:
          0.054279357 = sum of:
            0.054279357 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054279357 = score(doc=3545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.36992785 = fieldWeight in 3545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3545)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  7. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.00
    0.0015508389 = product of:
      0.015508389 = sum of:
        0.015508389 = product of:
          0.046525165 = sum of:
            0.046525165 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046525165 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.31708103 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  8. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.00
    0.0014247395 = product of:
      0.014247394 = sum of:
        0.014247394 = product of:
          0.04274218 = sum of:
            0.04274218 = weight(_text_:problem in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04274218 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Content
    This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    0.0013854074 = product of:
      0.013854073 = sum of:
        0.013854073 = product of:
          0.04156222 = sum of:
            0.04156222 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156222 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  10. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.00
    0.0011083259 = product of:
      0.011083259 = sum of:
        0.011083259 = product of:
          0.033249777 = sum of:
            0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033249777 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  11. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.00
    0.0011083259 = product of:
      0.011083259 = sum of:
        0.011083259 = product of:
          0.033249777 = sum of:
            0.033249777 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033249777 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  12. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995) 0.00
    0.0010176711 = product of:
      0.010176711 = sum of:
        0.010176711 = product of:
          0.03053013 = sum of:
            0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03053013 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
  13. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    9.697851E-4 = product of:
      0.009697851 = sum of:
        0.009697851 = product of:
          0.029093552 = sum of:
            0.029093552 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029093552 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  14. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.00
    8.141369E-4 = product of:
      0.008141369 = sum of:
        0.008141369 = product of:
          0.024424106 = sum of:
            0.024424106 = weight(_text_:problem in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024424106 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
  15. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.00
    6.927037E-4 = product of:
      0.0069270367 = sum of:
        0.0069270367 = product of:
          0.02078111 = sum of:
            0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02078111 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.00
    6.927037E-4 = product of:
      0.0069270367 = sum of:
        0.0069270367 = product of:
          0.02078111 = sum of:
            0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02078111 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik