Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.056313336 = product of:
  0.22525334 = sum of:
    0.22525334 = weight(_text_:soziale in 8847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22525334 = score(doc=8847,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045514934 = queryNorm
        0.8100313 = fieldWeight in 8847, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8847)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Lebensverhältnisse und soziale Konflikte im neuen Europa: 26. Deutscher Soziologentag. Sektionen, Arbeits- und Ad-hoc-Gruppen. Hrsg.: H. Meulemann u.a

0.046927784 = product of:
  0.18771113 = sum of:
    0.18771113 = weight(_text_:soziale in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18771113 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045514934 = queryNorm
        0.6750261 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Morphologische und strukturelle Fragestellungen sind für Soziologen elementar. Es wird in einige grundlegende soziologische Einteilungen (z.B. AGIL-Schema, soziale Schichten, Evolutionstypen) eingeführt und es werden Beispiele für Datenerhebenungsschemata (z.B. IPA-Beobachtungsschema, Wörterbücher) und Strukturierungstechniken in der Datenanalyse (z.B. Soziometrie, Strukturgleichungsmodelle, explorative Analyse) gegeben

0.032849446 = product of:
  0.13139778 = sum of:
    0.13139778 = weight(_text_:soziale in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13139778 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045514934 = queryNorm
        0.47251827 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Noch vor 50 Jahren hat man Wissensorganisation, das Entwickeln und Ordnen von wissenschaftlichen Konzepten, als ein logisches und damit universelles Problem gesehen. Altere Ansätze sehen die Wissensgebiete als naturgegeben und entsprechend organisch gewachsen an. Spätestens mit dem 'Konstruktivismus' ist eine Wende eingetreten, die Wissensorganisation als soziale Konvention begreift und entsprechend skeptisch universellen Ansprüchen gegenübersteht. Gleichzeitig hat in den Wissenschaften eine stärkere Beschäftigung mit historischen und soziologischen Untersuchungen der Grundlagen und in der Wissenschaftstheorie die Rückbesinnung auf Relativierungen unterschiedlicher Art an Bedeutung gewonnen. In dem Beitrag werden einzelne klassische wissenssoziologische Positionen erläutert, Folgerungen für Wissen und Information sowie Wissenschaft und Wissensorganisation gezogen und Einwände genannt.

0.017601274 = product of:
  0.070405096 = sum of:
    0.070405096 = sum of:
      0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03957187 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045514934 = queryNorm
          0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
      0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030833228 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045514934 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Since the middle of the last century knowledge organization, the development of scientific concepts and arrangements, has been seen as a cognitivistic (or rationalistic) problem and thus as universal and logical (cf. Turing 1950). Older approaches accordingly see areas of knowledge as naturally given and organically grown. The knowledge must only be detected and logically arranged. At latest with the constructivism a 'turn' has entered, which sees knowledge organization as a social convention and accordingly regards universal standards skeptical. Simultaneously in the sciences came up a stronger concern with historical, empirical and sociological studies of its foundations and in philosophy of science the return to different kinds of relativizations has gained more importance. With the challenge of self-organizing ordering systems by social software a new crisis comes up for knowledge organization. The future might be a combination of logical descriptions, specialized evaluation, and accompanying user-driven principles. In this paper, several classical sociological positions are discussed, conclusions are drawn for knowledge and information as well as for science and for knowledge organization and objections and prospects are designated.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.016788924 = product of:
  0.0671557 = sum of:
    0.0671557 = product of:
      0.1343114 = sum of:
        0.1343114 = weight(_text_:software in 8851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1343114 = score(doc=8851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.743841 = fieldWeight in 8851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Softstat'91: advances in statistical software 3; the 6th Conference on the Scientific Use of Statistical Software, April 7-12, 1991, Heidelberg. Hrsg.: F. Faulbaum

0.005395815 = product of:
  0.02158326 = sum of:
    0.02158326 = product of:
      0.04316652 = sum of:
        0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04316652 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly