Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces a normative principle for the behavior of contemporary computing and communication systems and considers some of its consequences. The principle, named the principle of distribution, says that in a distributed multi-agent system, control resides as much as possible with the individuals constituting the system rather than in centralized agents; and when that is unfeasible or becomes inappropriate due to environmental changes, control evolves upwards from the individuals to an appropriate intermediate level rather than being imposed from above. The setting for the work is the dynamically changing global space resulting from ubiquitous communication. Accordingly, the article begins by determining the characteristics of the distributed multi-agent space it spans. It then fleshes out the principle of distribution, with examples from daily life as well as from Computer Science. The case is made for the principle of distribution to work at various levels of abstraction of system behavior: to inform the high-level discussion that ought to precede the more low-level concerns of technology, protocols, and standardization, but also to facilitate those lower levels. Of the more substantial applications given here of the principle of distribution, a technical example concerns the design of secure ad hoc networks of mobile devices, achievable without any form of centralized authentication or identification but in a solely distributed manner. Here, the context is how the principle can be used to provide new and provably secure protocols for genuinely ubiquitous communication. A second, more managerial example concerns the distributed production and management of open-source software, and a third investigates some pertinent questions involving the dynamic restructuring of control in distributed systems, important in times of disaster or malevolence.
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  2. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01
    0.0061666453 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = product of:
          0.049333163 = sum of:
            0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049333163 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  3. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.0061666453 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = product of:
          0.049333163 = sum of:
            0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049333163 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  4. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01
    0.0061666453 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = product of:
          0.049333163 = sum of:
            0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049333163 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  5. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.00
    0.0039571873 = product of:
      0.01582875 = sum of:
        0.01582875 = product of:
          0.0316575 = sum of:
            0.0316575 = weight(_text_:software in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0316575 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
  6. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.00
    0.0038541534 = product of:
      0.015416614 = sum of:
        0.015416614 = product of:
          0.030833228 = sum of:
            0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030833228 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  7. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.00
    0.0027252978 = product of:
      0.010901191 = sum of:
        0.010901191 = product of:
          0.021802383 = sum of:
            0.021802383 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021802383 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)