-
Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022)
0.02
0.018771114 = product of:
0.075084455 = sum of:
0.075084455 = weight(_text_:soziale in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075084455 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.27001044 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Die Digitalisierung hat unsere Privatsphäre ausgehöhlt, die Öffentlichkeit in antagonistische Teilöffentlichkeiten zerlegt, Hemmschwellen gesenkt und die Grenze zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge aufgeweicht. Wolfgang Huber beschreibt klar und pointiert diese technische und soziale Entwicklung. Er zeigt, wie sich konsensfähige ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz finden lassen und umgesetzt werden können - von der Gesetzgebung, von digitalen Anbietern und von allen Nutzern. Die Haltungen zur Digitalisierung schwanken zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse: Die einen erwarten die Schaffung eines neuen Menschen, der sich selbst zum Gott macht. Andere befürchten den Verlust von Freiheit und Menschenwürde. Wolfgang Huber wirft demgegenüber einen realistischen Blick auf den technischen Umbruch. Das beginnt bei der Sprache: Sind die "sozialen Medien" wirklich sozial? Fährt ein mit digitaler Intelligenz ausgestattetes Auto "autonom" oder nicht eher automatisiert? Sind Algorithmen, die durch Mustererkennung lernen, deshalb "intelligent"? Eine überbordende Sprache lässt uns allzu oft vergessen, dass noch so leistungsstarke Rechner nur Maschinen sind, die von Menschen entwickelt und bedient werden. Notfalls muss man ihnen den Stecker ziehen. Das wunderbar anschaulich geschriebene Buch macht auf der Höhe der aktuellen ethischen Diskussionen bewusst, dass wir uns der Digitalisierung nicht ausliefern dürfen, sondern sie selbstbestimmt und verantwortlich gestalten können. 80. Geburtstag von Wolfgang Huber am 12.8.2022 Ein Heilmittel gegen allzu euphorische und apokalyptische Erwartungen an die Digitalisierung Wie wir unsere Haltung zur Digitalisierung ändern können, um uns nicht der Technik auszuliefern.
-
Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008)
0.02
0.017601274 = product of:
0.070405096 = sum of:
0.070405096 = sum of:
0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03957187 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030833228 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a normative principle for the behavior of contemporary computing and communication systems and considers some of its consequences. The principle, named the principle of distribution, says that in a distributed multi-agent system, control resides as much as possible with the individuals constituting the system rather than in centralized agents; and when that is unfeasible or becomes inappropriate due to environmental changes, control evolves upwards from the individuals to an appropriate intermediate level rather than being imposed from above. The setting for the work is the dynamically changing global space resulting from ubiquitous communication. Accordingly, the article begins by determining the characteristics of the distributed multi-agent space it spans. It then fleshes out the principle of distribution, with examples from daily life as well as from Computer Science. The case is made for the principle of distribution to work at various levels of abstraction of system behavior: to inform the high-level discussion that ought to precede the more low-level concerns of technology, protocols, and standardization, but also to facilitate those lower levels. Of the more substantial applications given here of the principle of distribution, a technical example concerns the design of secure ad hoc networks of mobile devices, achievable without any form of centralized authentication or identification but in a solely distributed manner. Here, the context is how the principle can be used to provide new and provably secure protocols for genuinely ubiquitous communication. A second, more managerial example concerns the distributed production and management of open-source software, and a third investigates some pertinent questions involving the dynamic restructuring of control in distributed systems, important in times of disaster or malevolence.
- Date
- 1. 6.2008 12:22:41
-
Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:57:43
-
Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
-
Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13.10.2006 10:22:03
-
O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:50:50
-
Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 25.12.2019 14:19:22
-
Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17. 3.2008 15:17:22
-
Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008)
0.00
0.0049464838 = product of:
0.019785935 = sum of:
0.019785935 = product of:
0.03957187 = sum of:
0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03957187 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
-
Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008)
0.00
0.0039571873 = product of:
0.01582875 = sum of:
0.01582875 = product of:
0.0316575 = sum of:
0.0316575 = weight(_text_:software in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0316575 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.00
0.0038541534 = product of:
0.015416614 = sum of:
0.015416614 = product of:
0.030833228 = sum of:
0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030833228 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005)
0.00
0.0027252978 = product of:
0.010901191 = sum of:
0.010901191 = product of:
0.021802383 = sum of:
0.021802383 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021802383 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Classification
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- DDC
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.00
0.0026979074 = product of:
0.01079163 = sum of:
0.01079163 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02158326 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.00
0.0023124919 = product of:
0.0092499675 = sum of:
0.0092499675 = product of:
0.018499935 = sum of:
0.018499935 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018499935 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
