Search (67 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Will, L.: Thesaurus management software (2009) 0.01 
    0.013850154 = product of:
  0.055400617 = sum of:
    0.055400617 = product of:
      0.110801235 = sum of:
        0.110801235 = weight(_text_:software in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110801235 = score(doc=3892,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Thesaurus data structures and exchange formats (ways of tagging and encoding thesauri for transfer between computer applications) are discussed. Single- and multiple-user thesaurus software is functionally similar, apart from scale. Several lists of requirements for such software have been published, and important aspects are summarized here, including input, editing, output, and the interfaces used by indexers and searchers. The way in which thesaurus software may be extended to cover other types of controlled vocabularies is covered briefly, followed by issues that arise in management and updating of thesauri, including changes to collections of documents indexed by previous versions and the mapping and merging of thesauri to provide a common search interface.
  2. Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996) 0.01 
    0.011871561 = product of:
  0.047486246 = sum of:
    0.047486246 = product of:
      0.09497249 = sum of:
        0.09497249 = weight(_text_:software in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09497249 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.525975 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade : vocabulary management software (2004) 0.01 
    0.011192616 = product of:
  0.044770464 = sum of:
    0.044770464 = product of:
      0.08954093 = sum of:
        0.08954093 = weight(_text_:software in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08954093 = score(doc=4859,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Basic concepts relevant to controlled vocabularies and outlines criteria for evaluating vocabulary management software are defined. A comparison of four representative vocabulary management products is provided in an accompanying table.
  4. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01 
    0.01079163 = product of:
  0.04316652 = sum of:
    0.04316652 = product of:
      0.08633304 = sum of:
        0.08633304 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08633304 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  5. Milstead, J.L.: Specifications for thesaurus software (1991) 0.01 
    0.010281074 = product of:
  0.041124295 = sum of:
    0.041124295 = product of:
      0.08224859 = sum of:
        0.08224859 = weight(_text_:software in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08224859 = score(doc=2291,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Specifications are presented for software designed to support manual development and maintenance of information retrieval thesauri. The specifications are intended to support both evaluation of existing packages for acquisition and design of custom software. Specialized requirements of thesaurus support are emphasized over more general database management requirements. Requirements for integration with larger systems and for the user interface are summarized. Relationships specified by the ANSI standard should be supported, and the relationships should be validated to avoid introduction of conflicting relationships. Flexibility in availability of note and date fields is important, and where required, term classifications should be available. Maintenance procedures should include provision for feedback on the impact of changes, as well as appropriate levels of approval for changes. A wide variety of online displays and printed reports are required, including but not limited to alphabetical, hierarchical, and rotated. In addition, it is desirable to be absle to search the thesaurus database with such capabilities as Boolean logic and proximity operators
  6. Lloréns, J.; Velasco, M.; Amescua, A. de; Moreiro, J.A.; Martínez, V.: Automatic generation of domain representations using thesaurus structures (2004) 0.01 
    0.010281074 = product of:
  0.041124295 = sum of:
    0.041124295 = product of:
      0.08224859 = sum of:
        0.08224859 = weight(_text_:software in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08224859 = score(doc=2501,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Domain analysis was first used 15 years ago as one of the most important techniques for software reuse. Even today, new techniques appear every year, and different authors propose different domain representation structures to represent and store all the different software components and the relationships among them. These relationships among components are the kernel of the domain semantics. In this report, a set of techniques and tools is presented regarding mathematical, statistical, and neural fields that, when linked together, enable semiautomatically building domain representations and storing them in a thesaurus structure of software components. Thesaurus structures, widely used in information science, are presented as the domain-modeling key concept, due to their higher automation possibilities compared with previous structures. New metrics to evaluate the quality, consistency, and completeness of the domain model obtained through this technique are also presented.
  7. Muraszkiewicz, M.; Rybinski, H.; Struk, W.: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri (1996) 0.01 
    0.0098929675 = product of:
  0.03957187 = sum of:
    0.03957187 = product of:
      0.07914374 = sum of:
        0.07914374 = weight(_text_:software in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07914374 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.0092499675 = product of:
  0.03699987 = sum of:
    0.03699987 = product of:
      0.07399974 = sum of:
        0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399974 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  9. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01 
    0.0092499675 = product of:
  0.03699987 = sum of:
    0.03699987 = product of:
      0.07399974 = sum of:
        0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399974 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01 
    0.0092499675 = product of:
  0.03699987 = sum of:
    0.03699987 = product of:
      0.07399974 = sum of:
        0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399974 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01 
    0.0092499675 = product of:
  0.03699987 = sum of:
    0.03699987 = product of:
      0.07399974 = sum of:
        0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399974 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  12. Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020) 0.01 
    0.008567562 = product of:
  0.03427025 = sum of:
    0.03427025 = product of:
      0.0685405 = sum of:
        0.0685405 = weight(_text_:software in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0685405 = score(doc=5828,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.37958977 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Some of the fundamental activities of the software development process are related to the discipline of Requirements Engineering, whose objective is the discovery, analysis, documentation and verification of the requirements that will be part of the system. Requirements are the conditions or capabilities that software must have or perform to meet the users needs. The present study is being developed to propose a model of cooperation between Information Science and Requirements Engineering. Aims to present the analysis results on the possibilities of using the knowledge organization systems: taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies during the activities of Requirements Engineering: design, survey, elaboration, negotiation, specification, validation and requirements management. From the results obtained it was possible to identify in which stage of the Requirements Engineering process, each type of knowledge organization system could be used. We expect that this study put in evidence the need for new researchs and proposals to strengt the exchange between Information Science, as a science that has information as object of study, and the Requirements Engineering which has in the information the raw material to identify the informational needs of software users.
  13. Sieber, W.: Thesaurus-Arbeit versus Informationsvisualisierung : Analyse und Evaluation am Maßstab der Usability (2007) 0.01 
    0.008394462 = product of:
  0.03357785 = sum of:
    0.03357785 = product of:
      0.0671557 = sum of:
        0.0671557 = weight(_text_:software in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0671557 = score(doc=1457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Traditionell werden Thesauren in Listen dargestellt, doch die Existenz von Software legt nahe, die Möglichkeiten moderner Informationsvisualisierung auszuschöpfen.Wolfram Sieber evaluiert, ob und wie Software zur Thesaurus-Visualisierung über die reine Listendarstellung hinausgeht. Besonderes Augenmerk richtet er darauf, wie gut dabei die Chancen der Visualisierung - Stichworte prä-/attentive Wahrnehmung und Change Blindness - genutzt werden, bzw. wie gegen sie verstoßen und der Nutzer dadurch in seiner Arbeit behindert wird.Zugunsten einer soliden Entscheidungsgrundlage hat Sieber eine detaillierte Liste von Prüfkriterien zusammengestellt und sieben verschiedene Thesaurus-Visualisierer daran gemessen. Diese Liste kann als Grundlage für weitergehende Evaluierungen verwendet werden, bietet sich aber vor allem als Richtschnur bei der Entwicklung eigener Thesaurus- und Graph-Visualisierer an. Anwendern und interessierten Laien hilft sie, zur Auswahl stehende Graph-Visualisierer aus fachlicher Sicht, wissenschaftlich abgesichert zu beurteilen. Dieses Werk richtet sich an Entscheider, Entwickler und Anwender aus Informationswissenschaft und -praxis, Informatik, Dokumentation.
  14. Lacasta, J.; Falquet, G.; Nogueras Iso, J.N.; Zarazaga-Soria, J.: ¬A software processing chain for evaluating thesaurus quality (2017) 0.01 
    0.008394462 = product of:
  0.03357785 = sum of:
    0.03357785 = product of:
      0.0671557 = sum of:
        0.0671557 = weight(_text_:software in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0671557 = score(doc=3485,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are knowledge models commonly used for information classication and retrieval whose structure is dened by standards that describe the main features the concepts and relations must have. However, following these standards requires a deep knowledge of the field the thesaurus is going to cover and experience in their creation. To help in this task, this paper describes a software processing chain that provides dierent validation components that evaluates the quality of the main thesaurus features.
  15. Gillman, P.: Transferring text (1993) 0.01 
    0.007914375 = product of:
  0.0316575 = sum of:
    0.0316575 = product of:
      0.063315 = sum of:
        0.063315 = weight(_text_:software in 6246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063315 = score(doc=6246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 6246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes a consultancy project for the development of a health care thesaurus involving the movement of text between different application programs. The thesaurus was built from existing text within the organisation originating from 3 sources: natural language registry file headings; descriptions from an internal business directory and a controlled vocabulary. The software used was WordPerfect and Cardbox
  16. Diaz, I.: Semi-automatic construction of thesaurus applying domain analysis techniques (1998) 0.01 
    0.007914375 = product of:
  0.0316575 = sum of:
    0.0316575 = product of:
      0.063315 = sum of:
        0.063315 = weight(_text_:software in 3744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063315 = score(doc=3744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes a specific application of domain analysis to the construction of thesauri to exploit domain analysis' ability to construct valid domain representations and determine fuzzy limits that normally define specific domains. The system employs a structure, called a Software Thesaurus (developed from a descriptor thesaurus), as a repository to store the information regarding specific domains. The domain representation is constructued semi automatically and can be used as a means of semiautomatic thesaurus generation
  17. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.01 
    0.007708307 = product of:
  0.030833228 = sum of:
    0.030833228 = product of:
      0.061666455 = sum of:
        0.061666455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061666455 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  18. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.01 
    0.007708307 = product of:
  0.030833228 = sum of:
    0.030833228 = product of:
      0.061666455 = sum of:
        0.061666455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061666455 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  19. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.01 
    0.007708307 = product of:
  0.030833228 = sum of:
    0.030833228 = product of:
      0.061666455 = sum of:
        0.061666455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061666455 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  20. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.01 
    0.007708307 = product of:
  0.030833228 = sum of:
    0.030833228 = product of:
      0.061666455 = sum of:
        0.061666455 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061666455 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 47
  • d 13
  • f 5
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 52
  • m 6
  • el 4
  • x 4
  • n 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications