Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.018771114 = product of:
  0.075084455 = sum of:
    0.075084455 = weight(_text_:soziale in 1741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075084455 = score(doc=1741,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045514934 = queryNorm
        0.27001044 = fieldWeight in 1741, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1741)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Bibliotheken verlassen zunehmend ihre traditionellen Pfade (Sammlung und Bereitstellung von Informationen und Medien) und erproben neue institutionelle Ausrichtungen. Sie übernehmen zusätzlich im Hinblick auf ihre Zielgruppen soziale, kulturelle und lernunterstützenden Funktionen. Diese Profilveränderung kann aber nur in einer vernetzten Struktur von Bildungs-, Kultureinrichtungen und sozialen Institutionen in einem räumlich gesamtzusammenhang stattfinden. diesem Zweck dienen kooperative Bildungs- und Lernarrangements abenso wie an Nutzerbedürfnissen orientierte technische systeme der digitalen Informationspräsentation, Recherche und Interaktion. Praktikern wie wissenschaftlich Interessierten aus Bibliotheken und deren kooperierenden Partnern aus Bildung und Kultur bietet dieser Band eine Fülle praxisorientierter Beispiele, die mögliche Profilveränderungen und Gestaltungsspielräume für Bibliotheken aufzeigen

0.005395815 = product of:
  0.02158326 = sum of:
    0.02158326 = product of:
      0.04316652 = sum of:
        0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04316652 = score(doc=4661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4661)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:45:51

0.005140537 = product of:
  0.020562148 = sum of:
    0.020562148 = product of:
      0.041124295 = sum of:
        0.041124295 = weight(_text_:software in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041124295 = score(doc=468,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.22775385 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Archival Information Systems (AIS) are becoming increasingly important. For decades, the amount of content created digitally is growing and its complete life cycle nowadays tends to remain digital. A selection of this content is expected to be of value for the future and can thus be considered being part of our cultural heritage. However, digital content poses many challenges for long-term or indefinite preservation, e.g. digital publications become increasingly complex by the embedding of different kinds of multimedia, data in arbitrary formats and software. As soon as these digital publications become obsolete, but are still deemed to be of value in the future, they have to be transferred smoothly into appropriate AIS where they need to be kept accessible even through changing technologies. The successful previous SDA workshop in 2011 showed: Both, the library and the archiving community have made valuable contributions to the management of huge amounts of knowledge and data. However, both are approaching this topic from different views which shall be brought together to cross-fertilize each other. There are promising combinations of pertinence and provenance models since those are traditionally the prevailing knowledge organization principles of the library and archiving community, respectively. Another scientific discipline providing promising technical solutions for knowledge representation and knowledge management is semantic technologies, which is supported by appropriate W3C recommendations and a large user community. At the forefront of making the semantic web a mature and applicable reality is the linked data initiative, which already has started to be adopted by the library community. It can be expected that using semantic (web) technologies in general and linked data in particular can mature the area of digital archiving as well as technologically tighten the natural bond between digital libraries and digital archives. Semantic representations of contextual knowledge about cultural heritage objects will enhance organization and access of data and knowledge. In order to achieve a comprehensive investigation, the information seeking and document triage behaviors of users (an area also classified under the field of Human Computer Interaction) will also be included in the research.
One of the major challenges of digital archiving is how to deal with changing technologies and changing user communities. On the one hand software, hardware and (multimedia) data formats that become obsolete and are not supported anymore still need to be kept accessible. On the other hand changing user communities necessitate technical means to formalize, detect and measure knowledge evolution. Furthermore, digital archival records are usually not deleted from the AIS and therefore, the amount of digitally archived (multimedia) content can be expected to grow rapidly. Therefore, efficient storage management solutions geared to the fact that cultural heritage is not as frequently accessed like up-to-date content residing in a digital library are required. Software and hardware needs to be tightly connected based on sophisticated knowledge representation and management models in order to face that challenge. In line with the above, contributions to the workshop should focus on, but are not limited to:

0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

27. 1.2015 11:48:22