Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Will, L.: Thesaurus management software (2009) 0.01
    0.013850154 = product of:
      0.055400617 = sum of:
        0.055400617 = product of:
          0.110801235 = sum of:
            0.110801235 = weight(_text_:software in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110801235 = score(doc=3892,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Thesaurus data structures and exchange formats (ways of tagging and encoding thesauri for transfer between computer applications) are discussed. Single- and multiple-user thesaurus software is functionally similar, apart from scale. Several lists of requirements for such software have been published, and important aspects are summarized here, including input, editing, output, and the interfaces used by indexers and searchers. The way in which thesaurus software may be extended to cover other types of controlled vocabularies is covered briefly, followed by issues that arise in management and updating of thesauri, including changes to collections of documents indexed by previous versions and the mapping and merging of thesauri to provide a common search interface.
  2. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade : vocabulary management software (2004) 0.01
    0.011192616 = product of:
      0.044770464 = sum of:
        0.044770464 = product of:
          0.08954093 = sum of:
            0.08954093 = weight(_text_:software in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08954093 = score(doc=4859,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Basic concepts relevant to controlled vocabularies and outlines criteria for evaluating vocabulary management software are defined. A comparison of four representative vocabulary management products is provided in an accompanying table.
  3. Lloréns, J.; Velasco, M.; Amescua, A. de; Moreiro, J.A.; Martínez, V.: Automatic generation of domain representations using thesaurus structures (2004) 0.01
    0.010281074 = product of:
      0.041124295 = sum of:
        0.041124295 = product of:
          0.08224859 = sum of:
            0.08224859 = weight(_text_:software in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08224859 = score(doc=2501,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Domain analysis was first used 15 years ago as one of the most important techniques for software reuse. Even today, new techniques appear every year, and different authors propose different domain representation structures to represent and store all the different software components and the relationships among them. These relationships among components are the kernel of the domain semantics. In this report, a set of techniques and tools is presented regarding mathematical, statistical, and neural fields that, when linked together, enable semiautomatically building domain representations and storing them in a thesaurus structure of software components. Thesaurus structures, widely used in information science, are presented as the domain-modeling key concept, due to their higher automation possibilities compared with previous structures. New metrics to evaluate the quality, consistency, and completeness of the domain model obtained through this technique are also presented.
  4. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01
    0.0092499675 = product of:
      0.03699987 = sum of:
        0.03699987 = product of:
          0.07399974 = sum of:
            0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07399974 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  5. Sieber, W.: Thesaurus-Arbeit versus Informationsvisualisierung : Analyse und Evaluation am Maßstab der Usability (2007) 0.01
    0.008394462 = product of:
      0.03357785 = sum of:
        0.03357785 = product of:
          0.0671557 = sum of:
            0.0671557 = weight(_text_:software in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0671557 = score(doc=1457,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Traditionell werden Thesauren in Listen dargestellt, doch die Existenz von Software legt nahe, die Möglichkeiten moderner Informationsvisualisierung auszuschöpfen.Wolfram Sieber evaluiert, ob und wie Software zur Thesaurus-Visualisierung über die reine Listendarstellung hinausgeht. Besonderes Augenmerk richtet er darauf, wie gut dabei die Chancen der Visualisierung - Stichworte prä-/attentive Wahrnehmung und Change Blindness - genutzt werden, bzw. wie gegen sie verstoßen und der Nutzer dadurch in seiner Arbeit behindert wird.Zugunsten einer soliden Entscheidungsgrundlage hat Sieber eine detaillierte Liste von Prüfkriterien zusammengestellt und sieben verschiedene Thesaurus-Visualisierer daran gemessen. Diese Liste kann als Grundlage für weitergehende Evaluierungen verwendet werden, bietet sich aber vor allem als Richtschnur bei der Entwicklung eigener Thesaurus- und Graph-Visualisierer an. Anwendern und interessierten Laien hilft sie, zur Auswahl stehende Graph-Visualisierer aus fachlicher Sicht, wissenschaftlich abgesichert zu beurteilen. Dieses Werk richtet sich an Entscheider, Entwickler und Anwender aus Informationswissenschaft und -praxis, Informatik, Dokumentation.
  6. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01
    0.007708307 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = product of:
          0.061666455 = sum of:
            0.061666455 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061666455 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  7. Eckert, K.: Thesaurus analysis and visualization in semantic search applications (2007) 0.01
    0.006995385 = product of:
      0.02798154 = sum of:
        0.02798154 = product of:
          0.05596308 = sum of:
            0.05596308 = weight(_text_:software in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05596308 = score(doc=3222,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://ki.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/fileadmin/publication/Eckert07Thesis.pdf. Für die Software vgl.: http://www.semtinel.org. Zur Beschreibung der Software: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/29611/.
  8. Thesaurus software (2001) 0.01
    0.006925077 = product of:
      0.027700309 = sum of:
        0.027700309 = product of:
          0.055400617 = sum of:
            0.055400617 = weight(_text_:software in 6773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055400617 = score(doc=6773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 6773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Retti, G.; Stehno, B.: ¬The Laurin thesaurus : a large, multilingual, electronic thesaurus for newspaper clipping archives (2004) 0.01
    0.006925077 = product of:
      0.027700309 = sum of:
        0.027700309 = product of:
          0.055400617 = sum of:
            0.055400617 = weight(_text_:software in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055400617 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the Laurin thesaurus, which is used for indexing and searching in the Laurin system, a software package for digital clipping archives. As a multilingual thesaurus it complies with the corresponding standards, though presenting some approaches going beyond some of the standards' recommendations. The Laurin thesaurus integrates all kind of indexing terms, not only keywords, but proper names as well. The system of categories and relationships is described in detail.
  10. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus : exercises, reading, resources (2004) 0.01
    0.006925077 = product of:
      0.027700309 = sum of:
        0.027700309 = product of:
          0.055400617 = sum of:
            0.055400617 = weight(_text_:software in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055400617 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A rationale for self-instruction in thesaurus making is presented. Some definitions of a thesaurus are given and sources suitable to begin self-tuition indicated. A sound grasp of grammar is emphasized and appropriate readings and exercises recommended. Readings in classification, facet analysis, and subject cataloging are described. An approach for deconstruction and reconstruction of sections of classification systems and thesauri is proposed and explained. Procedures for using exercises in thesaurus construction are detailed. The means of examining individual thesauri is suggested. The availability and use of free software are described. The creation of opportunities for self-learning is considered.
  11. Sieber, W.: Visualisierung von Thesaurus-Strukturen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung eines Hyperbolic Tree Views (2004) 0.01
    0.006925077 = product of:
      0.027700309 = sum of:
        0.027700309 = product of:
          0.055400617 = sum of:
            0.055400617 = weight(_text_:software in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055400617 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wenige Software-Werkzeuge zur Visualisierung von Thesaurus-Strukturen sind über das prototypische Stadium hinaus gelangt. Konkrete Implementationen entsprechender Anwendungen werden evaluiert. Aus den Gebieten Thesaurus-Entwicklung, Visualisierung, Interaktion, Informations- und Graphenvisualisierung werden Kriterien ermittelt, an denen die Implementierungen gemessen werden. Ein generisches Werkzeug zur Visualisierung dreidimensionaler hyperbolischer Bäume wird dazu verwendet, die Strukturen eines Thesaurus darzustellen. Dieses Werkzeug wird mit in die Evaluation einbezogen. Es hat sich gezeigt, dass die Visualisierung der Thesaurus-Strukturen auf Basis weniger unterschiedlicher Verfahren erfolgt. Der generische Visualisierer ist für Thesaurus-Strukturen prinzipiell geeignet, doch fehlen ihm spezifische Möglichkeiten der Domäne Thesaurus.
  12. McCulloch, E.: Thesauri: practical guidance for construction (2005) 0.01
    0.0059357807 = product of:
      0.023743123 = sum of:
        0.023743123 = product of:
          0.047486246 = sum of:
            0.047486246 = weight(_text_:software in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047486246 = score(doc=4724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - With the growing recognition that thesauri aid information retrieval, organisations are beginning to adopt, and in many cases, create thesauri. This paper offers some guidance on the construction process. Design/methodology/approach - An opinion piece with a practical focus, based on recent experiences gleaned from consultancy work. Findings - A number of steps can be taken to ensure any thesaurus under construction is fit for purpose. Due consideration is therefore given to aspects such as term selection, structure and notation, thesauri standards, software and Web display issues, thesauri evaluation and maintenance. This paper also notes that creating new subject schemes from scratch, however attractive, contributes to the plethora of terminologies currently in existence and can limit user searching within particular contexts. The decision to create a "new" thesaurus should therefore be taken carefully and observance of standards is paramount. Practical implications - This paper offers advice to assist practitioners in the development of thesauri. Originality/value - Useful guidance for those practitioners new to the area of thesaurus construction is provided, together with an overview of selected key processes involved in the construction of a thesaurus.
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.005395815 = product of:
      0.02158326 = sum of:
        0.02158326 = product of:
          0.04316652 = sum of:
            0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04316652 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  14. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.01
    0.005395815 = product of:
      0.02158326 = sum of:
        0.02158326 = product of:
          0.04316652 = sum of:
            0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04316652 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
  15. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.01
    0.005395815 = product of:
      0.02158326 = sum of:
        0.02158326 = product of:
          0.04316652 = sum of:
            0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04316652 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
  16. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.005395815 = product of:
      0.02158326 = sum of:
        0.02158326 = product of:
          0.04316652 = sum of:
            0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04316652 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  17. Faden, M.: ¬Der Einsatz eines WIKIs als zentrales Kommunikationsinstrument für die Thesauruspflege an verteilten Bibliotheksstandorten (2007) 0.00
    0.0049464838 = product of:
      0.019785935 = sum of:
        0.019785935 = product of:
          0.03957187 = sum of:
            0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03957187 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Mit dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, welche Möglichkeiten und Vorteile ein Wiki bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung eines Thesaurus bietet. Als Basis für diese Arbeit wird ein entsprechendes Wiki, der Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) und Einrichtungen an verschiedenen Standorten, die mit dem STW arbeiten (das sog. STW-Konsortium) herangezogen. Um die Untersuchungsergebnisse zu präsentieren und zu belegen, wird parallel dazu der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt; er ist die praktische Umsetzung der hier beschriebenen Möglichkeiten und wird im Internet zur Verfügung gestellt. Die Arbeit gliedert sich in zwei wesentliche Bereiche. Zuerst wird in einem kurzen Abriss die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Dokumentationssprachen, insbesondere von Thesauri, im 20. Jhd. beschrieben. Darauf aufbauend folgt die Darstellung der Genese und der Struktur des STW sowie dessen Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Der zweite Teil widmet sich dann dem eigentlichen Untersuchungsgegenstand: Um diesen sinnvoll vor- und darstellen zu können, erfolgt eine Einführung in die, zugegebenermaßen kurze Geschichte der WikiWelt. Dazu wird noch die Software MediaWiki, deren Möglichkeiten sowie die Theorie der Zusammenarbeit in Wikis beschrieben. Danach wird ein möglicher Einsatz von Wikitechnik bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung des STW beschrieben. Wie oben schon erwähnt, wird zur Präsentation der Ergebnisse im Inter-net, der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt. Neben der reinen Präsentation soll so auch ein (exemplarischer) Eindruck über die Praktikabilität und Anwendbarkeit der Wiki-technik vermittelt werden.
  18. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.00
    0.0046249838 = product of:
      0.018499935 = sum of:
        0.018499935 = product of:
          0.03699987 = sum of:
            0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03699987 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  19. Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006) 0.00
    0.0046249838 = product of:
      0.018499935 = sum of:
        0.018499935 = product of:
          0.03699987 = sum of:
            0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03699987 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
  20. ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008) 0.00
    0.004197231 = product of:
      0.016788924 = sum of:
        0.016788924 = product of:
          0.03357785 = sum of:
            0.03357785 = weight(_text_:software in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03357785 = score(doc=1169,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.18596025 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.