Search (589 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.24
    0.24096595 = product of:
      0.4819319 = sum of:
        0.120482974 = product of:
          0.3614489 = sum of:
            0.3614489 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3614489 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3614489 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3614489 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.14
    0.14457956 = product of:
      0.28915912 = sum of:
        0.07228978 = product of:
          0.21686934 = sum of:
            0.21686934 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21686934 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21686934 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21686934 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  3. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.13
    0.12632978 = product of:
      0.25265956 = sum of:
        0.048193187 = product of:
          0.14457956 = sum of:
            0.14457956 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14457956 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20446637 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20446637 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  4. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.12
    0.120482974 = product of:
      0.24096595 = sum of:
        0.060241487 = product of:
          0.18072446 = sum of:
            0.18072446 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18072446 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18072446 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18072446 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  5. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.12
    0.11768464 = product of:
      0.23536928 = sum of:
        0.21686934 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21686934 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.018499935 = product of:
          0.03699987 = sum of:
            0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03699987 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  6. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.06
    0.05624967 = product of:
      0.11249934 = sum of:
        0.092912264 = weight(_text_:soziale in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092912264 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.33412087 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.019587077 = product of:
          0.039174154 = sum of:
            0.039174154 = weight(_text_:software in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039174154 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.21695362 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    RSWK
    Bibliometrie / Semantic Web / Soziale Software
    Subject
    Bibliometrie / Semantic Web / Soziale Software
  7. Humphreys, L.: ¬The qualified self : social media and the accounting of everyday life (2018) 0.05
    0.04597965 = product of:
      0.1839186 = sum of:
        0.1839186 = weight(_text_:soziale in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1839186 = score(doc=5364,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.6613878 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    BK
    71.40 Soziale Prozesse: Allgemeines
    77.63 Soziale Interaktion soziale Beziehungen
    Classification
    71.40 Soziale Prozesse: Allgemeines
    77.63 Soziale Interaktion soziale Beziehungen
  8. Jun, Y.; Meng, R.; Venkataramani Johar, G.: Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking (2017) 0.03
    0.028156668 = product of:
      0.11262667 = sum of:
        0.11262667 = weight(_text_:soziale in 3672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11262667 = score(doc=3672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.40501565 = fieldWeight in 3672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3672)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Fact-Checking: Die unkritische Gruppe. Soziale Gesellschaft macht anfälliger für Fake News.
  9. Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014) 0.03
    0.027494242 = product of:
      0.10997697 = sum of:
        0.10997697 = sum of:
          0.07914374 = weight(_text_:software in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07914374 = score(doc=3404,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The present essay is based on research funded by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology and carried out by the Munich School of Philosophy (Prof. Godehard Brüntrup) in cooperation with the IT company Comelio GmbH. It is concerned with setting up the philosophical framework for a systematic, hierarchical and categorical account of questions and answers in order to use this framework as an ontology for software engineers who create a tool for intelligent questionnaire design. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in programming software that enables users to create and carry out their own surveys. Considering the, to say the least, vast amount of areas of applications these software tools try to cover, it is surprising that most of the existing tools lack a systematic approach to what questions and answers really are and in what kind of systematic hierarchical relations different types of questions stand to each other. The theoretical background to this essay is inspired Barry Smith's theory of regional ontologies. The notion of ontology used in this essay can be defined by the following characteristics: (1) The basic notions of the ontology should be defined in a manner that excludes equivocations of any kind. They should also be presented in a way that allows for an easy translation into a semi-formal language, in order to secure easy applicability for software engineers. (2) The hierarchical structure of the ontology should be that of an arbor porphyriana.
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:59
  10. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.02
    0.024641784 = product of:
      0.098567136 = sum of:
        0.098567136 = sum of:
          0.055400617 = weight(_text_:software in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055400617 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04316652 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Goggins, S.P.; Mascaro, C.; Valetto, G.: Group informatics : a methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research (2013) 0.02
    0.021121528 = product of:
      0.08448611 = sum of:
        0.08448611 = sum of:
          0.047486246 = weight(_text_:software in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486246 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
          0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03699987 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present a methodological approach, called Group Informatics, for understanding the social connections that are created between members of technologically mediated groups. Our methodological approach supports focused thinking about how online groups differ from each other, and diverge from their face-to-face counterparts. Group Informatics is grounded in 5 years of empirical studies of technologically mediated groups in online learning, software engineering, online political discourse, crisis informatics, and other domains. We describe the Group Informatics model and the related, 2-phase methodological approach in detail. Phase one of the methodological approach centers on a set of guiding research questions aimed at directing the application of Group Informatics to new corpora of integrated electronic trace data and qualitative research data. Phase 2 of the methodological approach is a systematic set of steps for transforming electronic trace data into weighted social networks.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:36:45
  12. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.02
    0.021121528 = product of:
      0.08448611 = sum of:
        0.08448611 = sum of:
          0.047486246 = weight(_text_:software in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486246 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03699987 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  13. Ohly, H.P.: Sociological aspects of knowledge and knowledge organization (2014) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Since the middle of the last century knowledge organization, the development of scientific concepts and arrangements, has been seen as a cognitivistic (or rationalistic) problem and thus as universal and logical (cf. Turing 1950). Older approaches accordingly see areas of knowledge as naturally given and organically grown. The knowledge must only be detected and logically arranged. At latest with the constructivism a 'turn' has entered, which sees knowledge organization as a social convention and accordingly regards universal standards skeptical. Simultaneously in the sciences came up a stronger concern with historical, empirical and sociological studies of its foundations and in philosophy of science the return to different kinds of relativizations has gained more importance. With the challenge of self-organizing ordering systems by social software a new crisis comes up for knowledge organization. The future might be a combination of logical descriptions, specialized evaluation, and accompanying user-driven principles. In this paper, several classical sociological positions are discussed, conclusions are drawn for knowledge and information as well as for science and for knowledge organization and objections and prospects are designated.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Marcondes, C.H.; Costa, L.C da.: ¬A model to represent and process scientific knowledge in biomedical articles with semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization faces the challenge of managing the amount of knowledge available on the Web. Published literature in biomedical sciences is a huge source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be managed through automatic methods. The conventional channel for reporting scientific results is Web electronic publishing. Despite its advances, scientific articles are still published in print formats such as portable document format (PDF). Semantic Web and Linked Data technologies provides new opportunities for communicating, sharing, and integrating scientific knowledge that can overcome the limitations of the current print format. Here is proposed a semantic model of scholarly electronic articles in biomedical sciences that can overcome the limitations of traditional flat records formats. Scientific knowledge consists of claims made throughout article texts, especially when semantic elements such as questions, hypotheses and conclusions are stated. These elements, although having different roles, express relationships between phenomena. Once such knowledge units are extracted and represented with technologies such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and linked data, they may be integrated in reasoning chains. Thereby, the results of scientific research can be published and shared in structured formats, enabling crawling by software agents, semantic retrieval, knowledge reuse, validation of scientific results, and identification of traces of scientific discoveries.
    Date
    12. 3.2016 13:17:22
  15. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  16. Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The main point that we want to state in this study is that research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania over the last twenty years is unequally and unjustly distributed among different professional categories ranging from library and information science faculty members, library professionals, software tools developers and independent researchers. The special condition of library and information science functioning as a university department in Romania with an interruption of 20 years (1970-1990) affected the overall situation of scientific research in the specific fields associated with this discipline. Our study has three stages: data collection, data recording and data interpretation. The primary outcomes of the scientific research activities considered are publications (books, book chapters and journal articles). Given this, our interest will be directed towards analyzing to what extent research and writing for publication have an impact on the evolution of Romanian libraries over this twenty years span.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.02
    0.017601274 = product of:
      0.070405096 = sum of:
        0.070405096 = sum of:
          0.03957187 = weight(_text_:software in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03957187 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030833228 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045514934 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Colvin, E.; Kraft, D.H.: Fuzzy retrieval for software reuse (2016) 0.02
    0.016962906 = product of:
      0.067851625 = sum of:
        0.067851625 = product of:
          0.13570325 = sum of:
            0.13570325 = weight(_text_:software in 3119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13570325 = score(doc=3119,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.75154936 = fieldWeight in 3119, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Finding software for reuse is a problem that programmers face. To reuse code that has been proven to work can increase any programmer's productivity, benefit corporate productivity, and also increase the stability of software programs. This paper shows that fuzzy retrieval has an improved retrieval performance over typical Boolean retrieval. Various methods of fuzzy information retrieval implementation and their use for software reuse will be examined. A deeper explanation of the fundamentals of designing a fuzzy information retrieval system for software reuse is presented. Future research options and necessary data storage systems are explored.
    Form
    Software
  19. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.02
    0.016424723 = product of:
      0.06569889 = sum of:
        0.06569889 = weight(_text_:soziale in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06569889 = score(doc=4515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2780798 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.23625913 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.4, S.205-206 (C. Carstens): "Welche Arten der Wissensrepräsentation existieren im Web, wie ausgeprägt sind semantische Strukturen in diesem Kontext, und wie können soziale Aktivitäten im Sinne des Web 2.0 zur Strukturierung von Wissen im Web beitragen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich Wellers Buch mit dem Titel Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web. Der Begriff Social Semantic Web spielt einerseits auf die semantische Strukturierung von Daten im Sinne des Semantic Web an und deutet andererseits auf die zunehmend kollaborative Inhaltserstellung im Social Web hin. Weller greift die Entwicklungen in diesen beiden Bereichen auf und beleuchtet die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die aus der Kombination der Aktivitäten im Semantic Web und im Social Web entstehen. Der Fokus des Buches liegt dabei primär auf den konzeptuellen Herausforderungen, die sich in diesem Kontext ergeben. So strebt die originäre Vision des Semantic Web die Annotation aller Webinhalte mit ausdrucksstarken, hochformalisierten Ontologien an. Im Social Web hingegen werden große Mengen an Daten von Nutzern erstellt, die häufig mithilfe von unkontrollierten Tags in Folksonomies annotiert werden. Weller sieht in derartigen kollaborativ erstellten Inhalten und Annotationen großes Potenzial für die semantische Indexierung, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Retrieval im Web. Das Hauptinteresse des Buches besteht daher darin, eine Brücke zwischen den Wissensrepräsentations-Methoden im Social Web und im Semantic Web zu schlagen. Um dieser Fragestellung nachzugehen, gliedert sich das Buch in drei Teile. . . .
  20. Dodero, J.M.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Traverso, I.: Automating technical reviews in software forges and repositories based on linked data (2014) 0.01
    0.014539635 = product of:
      0.05815854 = sum of:
        0.05815854 = product of:
          0.11631708 = sum of:
            0.11631708 = weight(_text_:software in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11631708 = score(doc=1569,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045514934 = queryNorm
                0.6441852 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Automating the evaluation of a software process is complex due to the absence of interoperability mechanisms between the tools that are used to manage, develop or maintain software projects. This work presents an approach to facilitate the construction of mechanisms to evaluate software projects. Based on information integration principles and Linked Open Data techniques, project management and development tools can expose their data using a set of shared models, thereby facilitating the development of integration solutions intended for software process evaluation. A practical application of the approach is here described in order to facilitate automated technical reviews of projects in software forges and repositories.

Types

  • a 522
  • m 48
  • el 34
  • s 21
  • x 6
  • b 5
  • r 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications