Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"AP 18420"
  1. Rogers, R.: Digital methods (2013) 0.20
    0.2002581 = product of:
      0.4005162 = sum of:
        0.04467585 = weight(_text_:world in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04467585 = score(doc=2354,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.05936583 = weight(_text_:wide in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05936583 = score(doc=2354,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.060253803 = weight(_text_:web in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060253803 = score(doc=2354,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.5396523 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.04467585 = weight(_text_:world in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04467585 = score(doc=2354,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.05936583 = weight(_text_:wide in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05936583 = score(doc=2354,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.060253803 = weight(_text_:web in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060253803 = score(doc=2354,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.5396523 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
        0.07192527 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192527 = score(doc=2354,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19842365 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
      0.5 = coord(7/14)
    
    Abstract
    In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
    Content
    The end of the virtual : digital methods -- The link and the politics of Web space -- The website as archived object -- Googlization and the inculpable engine -- Search as research -- National Web studies -- Social media and post-demographics -- Wikipedia as cultural reference -- After cyberspace : big data, small data.
    LCSH
    Web search engines
    World Wide Web / Research
    RSWK
    Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
    Web search engines
    World Wide Web / Research
  2. Webwissenschaft : eine Einführung (2010) 0.17
    0.16555369 = product of:
      0.38629192 = sum of:
        0.048363026 = weight(_text_:world in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048363026 = score(doc=2870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.3677747 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
        0.0642654 = weight(_text_:wide in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0642654 = score(doc=2870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.42394912 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
        0.08051753 = weight(_text_:web in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051753 = score(doc=2870,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
        0.048363026 = weight(_text_:world in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048363026 = score(doc=2870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.3677747 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
        0.0642654 = weight(_text_:wide in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0642654 = score(doc=2870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.42394912 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
        0.08051753 = weight(_text_:web in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051753 = score(doc=2870,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Abstract
    Das World Wide Web unterscheidet sich strukturell erheblich von den traditionellen Medien und hat das Mediensystem von Grund auf verändert. Radikal sind die Auswirkungen der webtechnischen Innovation sowohl für die Medienlandschaft und die Gesellschaft als auch für diejenigen Wissenschaften, die sich mit Medien - deren Geschichte, Inhalten, Formen, Technik, Wirkungen usf. - befassen. In dieser Einführung werden vor diesem Hintergrund einerseits Forschungsfragen einer zukünftigen Webwissenschaft auf einer übergeordneten Ebene diskutiert, andererseits werden die Perspektiven der relevanten Bezugswissenschaften integriert.
    Content
    Inhalt: Ist das Web ein Medium? --Konrad Scherfer Warum und zu welchem Zweck benötigen wir eine Webwissenschaft? 31- Helmut Volpers 'Diese Site wird nicht mehr gewartet'. Medienanalytische Perspektiven in den Medienwechseln - Rainer Leschke Emergente Öffentlichkeit? Bausteine zu einer Theorie der Weböffentlichkeit - Christoph Ernst Das ICH im Web - Auswirkungen virtueller Identitäten auf soziale Beziehungen - Helmut Volpers / Karin Wunder Technikgeschichte des Webs - Tom Alby Visuelles Denken im Interaktions- und Webdesign - Cyrus Khazaeli Das fotografische Bild im Web - Anja Bohnhof / Kolja Kracht Qualität im Web - Interdisziplinäre Website-Bewertung - David Kratz Für eine neue Poesie der Neugier. Das Web verändert den Journalismus - nicht nur online - Mercedes Bunz Das Web braucht Spezialisten, keine Generalisten. Zur Notwendigkeit einer webspezifischen Professionalisierung in der Ausbildung - Petra Werner Online-Forschung im Web - Methodenschwerpunkte im Überblick - Simone Fühles-Ubach Im Spiel der Moden? - Das Web in der Wirtschaft, die Wirtschaft im Web - Jörg Hoewner Medizin im Web - Martina Waitz Das Web und das Medienrecht - Bernd Holznagel / Thorsten Ricke Suchmaschinenforschung im Kontext einer zukünftigen Webwissenschaft - Dirk Lewandowski
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Medienwissenschaft / Kommunikationswissenschaft
    Web Site / Gestaltung
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Medienwissenschaft / Kommunikationswissenschaft
    Web Site / Gestaltung
  3. Gugerli, D.: Suchmaschinen : die Welt als Datenbank (2009) 0.07
    0.06849681 = product of:
      0.15982588 = sum of:
        0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022337925 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029682916 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.027892092 = weight(_text_:web in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027892092 = score(doc=1160,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022337925 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029682916 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.027892092 = weight(_text_:web in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027892092 = score(doc=1160,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Abstract
    Plötzlich diese Übersicht. Milliarden von Seiten, in Sekundenbruchteilen durchsucht, als Trefferliste sauber angezeigt, mit der größten Selbstverständlichkeit sortiert nach Rang und Namen. Google bestimmt die Routinen des Alltags und ist dennoch nicht die Suchmaschine schlechthin. Auch außerhalb des World Wide Web gibt es zahllose, technisch hochgerüstete Prozeduren des Suchens. Die gegenwärtige Selbstverständlichkeit der einen Suchmaschine läßt leicht übersehen, daß Suchmaschinen einen Interessenkonflikt induzieren zwischen jenen, die sie einsetzen wollen, und jenen, auf die sie angesetzt werden. Ihr prekärer Status im Spannungsfeld zwischen Übersicht und Überwachung wird verdrängt. Anhand von vier Fallstudien zeigt David Gugerli die Entwicklung der Suchmaschine auf, von den frühen Fernseh-Ratespielen, von Robert Lembkes Unterhaltungsshow »Was bin ich?«, über Eduard Zimmermanns Fahndungssendung »Aktenzeichen XY« und Horst Herolds »Kybernetik der Polizei« bis zu der von Ted Codd ausgehenden Entwicklung der relationalen Datenbank. Während Lembke auf die Feststellung von Normalität ausgerichtet war, suchte Zimmermann die Devianz, Herold die Muster und Codd die allgemeingültige Such- und Abfragesprache für in Form gebrachte Wissensbestände, die man seit Mitte der sechziger Jahre Datenbanken nennt. »Die Geschichte der Suchmaschine ist eine eminent politische. Mit Suchmaschinen lassen sich Hoffnungen auf Fundamentaldemokratisierung und informationelle Emanzipation ebenso verbinden wie Horrorvisionen eines Orwellschen Überwachungsstaats, der über ein technokratisches Wissensmonopol verfügt.«
    LCSH
    Web search engines / Social aspects
    Subject
    Web search engines / Social aspects
  4. Baumeister, H.; Schwärzel, K.: Wissenswelt Internet : Eine Infrastruktur und ihr Recht (2018) 0.04
    0.044589292 = product of:
      0.15606251 = sum of:
        0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03350689 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
        0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04452437 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
        0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03350689 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
        0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04452437 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Vernetzung von Informationen, die Wissen entstehen lässt, war der originäre Entstehungskontext des Internets und seiner populärsten Anwendung, des World Wide Webs. Aus dieser Perspektive stellt das Internet sowohl einen riesigen Speicher von Informationen als auch - ermöglicht durch seine Struktur des (Mit-)Teilens und Vernetzens - ein Medium zur Erzeugung, Organisation, Repräsentation und Vermittlung von Wissen dar. Mit seinen Anwendungen bildet es die Infrastruktur, auf die Wissenspraktiken zurückgreifen. Diese Infrastruktur ist von ihrer Entstehung bis zu ihren Zukunftsaussichten Gegenstand des vorliegenden Bandes, welcher im Stile eines Casebooks auch die juristischen Grundlagen und Herausforderungen herausarbeitet. Das Buch wendet sich insbesondere an Studierende der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft sowie Beschäftigte in Informationseinrichtungen.
  5. Capurro, R.; Eldred, M.; Nagel, D.: Digital whoness : identity, privacy and freedom in the cyberworld (2013) 0.01
    0.013538828 = product of:
      0.094771795 = sum of:
        0.047385897 = weight(_text_:world in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047385897 = score(doc=3382,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
        0.047385897 = weight(_text_:world in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047385897 = score(doc=3382,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The first aim is to provide well-articulated concepts by thinking through elementary phenomena of today's world, focusing on privacy and the digital, to clarify who we are in the cyberworld - hence a phenomenology of digital whoness. The second aim is to engage critically, hermeneutically with older and current literature on privacy, including in today's emerging cyberworld. Phenomenological results include concepts of i) self-identity through interplay with the world, ii) personal privacy in contradistinction to the privacy of private property, iii) the cyberworld as an artificial, digital dimension in order to discuss iv) what freedom in the cyberworld can mean, whilst not neglecting v) intercultural aspects and vi) the EU context.
  6. Internet im Alltag : qualitative Studien zum praktischen Sinn von Onlineangeboten (2009) 0.01
    0.009573397 = product of:
      0.06701378 = sum of:
        0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03350689 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
        0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03350689 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet ist im Alltag angekommen. Die hier versammelten 14 Studien belegen dies eindeutig. Je nach Lebenswelt und Habitus schreiben die Nutzer dem Internet aber einen unterschiedlichen "praktischen Sinn" zu: Jugendliche suchen online nach ihrer Identität, Computerspieler nach Wettkampf, Spiegel Online-Leser nach einem Meinungsmacher und Arbeitslose nach Selbstbestätigung. Während eine umfassende qualitative Studie (Basis: 102 Deutsche ab 14 Jahren) ganz allgemein nach dem Internet "im Alltag" fragt, beschäftigen sich die anderen Beiträge entweder mit unterschiedlichen Lebenswelten (Kinder, Jugendliche, Studenten, junge Mütter, Homosexuelle und Arbeitslose) oder mit speziellen Internetangeboten (StudiVZ, süddeutsche.de, Spiegel Online, Twitter, Blogs, World of Warcraft und Counterstrike). Theoretische Klammer ist das Habitus-Kapital-Konzept von Bourdieu.
  7. Segev, E.: Google and the digital divide : the bias of online knowledge (2010) 0.01
    0.007977831 = product of:
      0.055844814 = sum of:
        0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027922407 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
        0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027922407 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Power, communication and the internet -- The structure and power of search engines -- Google and the politics of online searching -- Users and uses of Google's information -- Mass media channels and the world of Google News -- Google's global mapping
  8. Weinberger, D.: Too big to know : rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren't the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room (2011) 0.01
    0.00789765 = product of:
      0.055283546 = sum of:
        0.027641773 = weight(_text_:world in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027641773 = score(doc=334,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21020076 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
        0.027641773 = weight(_text_:world in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027641773 = score(doc=334,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21020076 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    In this title, a leading philosopher of the internet explains how knowledge and expertise can still work - and even grow stronger - in an age when the internet has made topics simply Too Big to Know. Knowing used to be so straightforward. If we wanted to know something we looked it up, asked an expert, gathered the facts, weighted the possibilities, and honed in on the best answer ourselves. But, ironically, with the advent of the internet and the limitless information it contains, we're less sure about what we know, who knows what, or even what it means to know at all. Knowledge, it would appear, is in crisis. And yet, while its very foundations seem to be collapsing, human knowledge has grown in previously unimaginable ways, and in inconceivable directions, in the Internet age. We fact-check the news media more closely and publicly than ever before. Science is advancing at an unheard of pace thanks to new collaborative techniques and new ways to find patterns in vast amounts of data. Businesses are finding expertise in every corner of their organization, and across the broad swath of their stakeholders. We are in a crisis of knowledge at the same time that we are in an epochal exaltation of knowledge. In "Too Big to Know", Internet philosopher David Weinberger explains that, rather than a systemic collapse, the Internet era represents a fundamental change in the methods we have for understanding the world around us. Weinberger argues that our notions of expertise - what it is, how it works, and how it is cultivated - are out of date, rooted in our pre-networked culture and assumptions. For thousands of years, we've relied upon a reductionist process of filtering, winnowing, and otherwise reducing the complex world to something more manageable in order to understand it. Back then, an expert was someone who had mastered a particular, well-defined domain. Now, we live in an age when topics are blown apart and stitched together by momentary interests, diverse points of view, and connections ranging from the insightful to the perverse. Weinberger shows that, while the limits of our own paper-based tools have historically prevented us from achieving our full capacity of knowledge, we can now be as smart as our new medium allows - but we will be smart differently. For the new medium is a network, and that network changes our oldest, most basic strategy of knowing. Rather than knowing-by-reducing, we are now knowing-by-including. Indeed, knowledge now is best thought of not as the content of books or even of minds, but as the way the network works. Knowledge will never be the same - not for science, not for business, not for education, not for government, not for any of us. As Weinberger makes clear, to make sense of this new system of knowledge, we need - and smart companies are developing - networks that are themselves experts. Full of rich and sometimes surprising examples from history, politics, business, philosophy, and science, "Too Big to Know" describes how the very foundations of knowledge have been overturned, and what this revolution means for our future.
  9. Deep Search : Politik des Suchens jenseits von Google; Deep Search-Konferenz ; (Wien) : 2008.11.08; eine Veröffentlichung des World-Information Institute (2009) 0.01
    0.0063822647 = product of:
      0.04467585 = sum of:
        0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022337925 = score(doc=15,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
        0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022337925 = score(doc=15,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  10. Mythos Internet (1997) 0.00
    0.0029980778 = product of:
      0.041973088 = sum of:
        0.041973088 = weight(_text_:analyse in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041973088 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18025847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: William J. Mitchell - Die neue Ökonomie der Präsenz - Bausteine der Netztheorie Jay D. Bolter: Das Internet in der Geschichte der Technologien des Schreibens - Mike Sandbothe: Interaktivität - Hypertextualität - Transversalität. Eine medienphilosophische Analyse des Internet - Sybille Krämer: Vom Mythos »Künstliche Intelligenz« zum Mythos »Künstliche Kommunikation« oder: Ist eine nicht-anthropomorphe Beschreibung von Internet-Interaktionen möglich? - Stefan Münker: Was heißt eigentlich: »virtuelle Realität«? Ein philosophischer Kommentar zum neuesten Versuch der Verdopplung der Welt - Die Idee virtueller Gemeinschaften Steven Jones: Kommunikation, das Internet und Elektromagnetismus - Mark Poster: Elektronische Identitäten und Demokratie - Alexander Roesler: Bequeme Einmischung. Internet und Öffentlichkeit - Rudolf Maresch: Öffentlichkeit im Netz. Ein Phantasma schreibt sich fort - Digitale Märkte Saskia Sassen: Cyber-Segmentierungen. Elektronischer Raum und Macht - Alexandra Vitt: Zukunftsvision Cybergeld: Finanzdienste und ihre Netzerfahrung - Gerhard Schub von Bossiazky: Perspektiven für die neuen Online-Vertriebswege - Günter Müller - Das Internet als Experimentierfeld für moderne Telekommunikationsinfrastrukturen - Netzkultur Eduardo Kac: Das Internet und die Zukunft der Kunst - Uwe Wirth - Literatur im Internet. Oder: Wen kümmert's, wer liest? - Geert Lovink und Pit Schultz: Anmerkungen zur Netzkritik - Florian Rötzer - Virtueller Raum oder Weltraum? Raumutopien des digitalen Zeitalters

Languages

Types

  • m 10
  • s 3