Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.060958263 = product of:
  0.24383305 = sum of:
    0.075414985 = weight(_text_:web in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075414985 = score(doc=4870,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13072169 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040055543 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
    0.16841806 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16841806 = score(doc=4870,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23231146 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040055543 = queryNorm
        0.72496665 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Object

Web 2.0

Source

Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini

0.01096494 = product of:
  0.08771952 = sum of:
    0.08771952 = weight(_text_:world in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08771952 = score(doc=5911,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15396032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040055543 = queryNorm
        0.5697541 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

We propose an approach to visualizing the scientific world and its evolution by constructing minimum spanning trees (MSTs) and a two-dimensional map of scientific journals using the database of the Science Citation Index (SCI) during 1994-2001. The structures of constructed MSTs are consistent with the sorting of SCI categories. The map of science is constructed based on our MST results. Such a map shows the relation among various knowledge clusters and their citation properties. The temporal evolution of the scientific world can also be delineated in the map. In particular, this map clearly shows a linear structure of the scientific world, which contains three major domains including physical sciences, life sciences, and medical sciences. The interaction of various knowledge fields can be clearly seen from this scientific world map. This approach can be applied to various levels of knowledge domains.

0.004086392 = product of:
  0.032691136 = sum of:
    0.032691136 = weight(_text_:world in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032691136 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15396032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040055543 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Automated methods for the analysis, modeling, and visualization of large-scale scientometric data provide measures that enable the depiction of the state of world scientific development. We aimed to integrate minimum span clustering (MSC) and minimum spanning tree methods to cluster and visualize the global pattern of scientific publications (PSP) by analyzing aggregated Science Citation Index (SCI) data from 1994 to 2011. We hypothesized that PSP clustering is mainly affected by countries' geographic location, ethnicity, and level of economic development, as indicated in previous studies. Our results showed that the 100 countries with the highest rates of publications were decomposed into 12 PSP groups and that countries within a group tended to be geographically proximal, ethnically similar, or comparable in terms of economic status. Hubs and bridging nodes in each knowledge production group were identified. The performance of each group was evaluated across 16 knowledge domains based on their specialization, volume of publications, and relative impact. Awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of each group in various knowledge domains may have useful applications for examining scientific policies, adjusting the allocation of resources, and promoting international collaboration for future developments.

0.0035350774 = product of:
  0.02828062 = sum of:
    0.02828062 = weight(_text_:web in 2906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02828062 = score(doc=2906,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13072169 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040055543 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2906, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2906)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

The use of research impact metrics and analytics has become an integral component to many aspects of institutional assessment. Many platforms currently exist to provide such analytics, both proprietary and open source; however, the functionality of these systems may not always overlap to serve uniquely specific needs. In this paper, I describe a novel web-based platform, named Manifold, that I built to serve custom research impact assessment needs in the University of Minnesota Medical School. Built on a standard LAMP architecture, Manifold automatically pulls publication data for faculty from Scopus through APIs, calculates impact metrics through automated analytics, and dynamically generates report-like profiles that visualize those metrics. Work on this project has resulted in many lessons learned about challenges to sustainability and scalability in developing a system of such magnitude.

0.0016959291 = product of:
  0.013567433 = sum of:
    0.013567433 = product of:
      0.027134866 = sum of:
        0.027134866 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027134866 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14026769 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040055543 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

22. 7.2006 16:11:05