-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011)
0.01
0.009293842 = product of:
0.07435074 = sum of:
0.07435074 = product of:
0.14870147 = sum of:
0.14870147 = weight(_text_:1930 in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14870147 = score(doc=4143,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23914145 = queryWeight, product of:
7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.6218139 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- This work identifies changes in dominant topics in library and information science (LIS) over time, by analyzing the 3,121 doctoral dissertations completed between 1930 and 2009 at North American Library and Information Science programs. The authors utilize latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify latent topics diachronically and to identify representative dissertations of those topics. The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930-1969) to the present (2000-2009). However, some themes occurred in multiple periods, representing core areas of the field: library history occurred in the first two periods; citation analysis in the second and third periods; and information-seeking behavior in the fourth and last period. Two topics occurred in three of the five periods: information retrieval and information use. One of the notable changes in the topics was the diminishing use of the word library (and related terms). This has implications for the provision of doctoral education in LIS. This work is compared to other earlier analyses and provides validation for the use of LDA in topic analysis of a discipline.
-
Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998)
0.00
0.0017115625 = product of:
0.0136925 = sum of:
0.0136925 = product of:
0.0410775 = sum of:
0.0410775 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0410775 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1056919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.00
0.001187316 = product of:
0.009498528 = sum of:
0.009498528 = product of:
0.028495584 = sum of:
0.028495584 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028495584 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105215445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
-
Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014)
0.00
0.0010269375 = product of:
0.0082155 = sum of:
0.0082155 = product of:
0.024646498 = sum of:
0.024646498 = weight(_text_:29 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024646498 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1056919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:40:41
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.00
0.0010176995 = product of:
0.008141596 = sum of:
0.008141596 = product of:
0.024424786 = sum of:
0.024424786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024424786 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105215445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018)
0.00
8.5578125E-4 = product of:
0.00684625 = sum of:
0.00684625 = product of:
0.02053875 = sum of:
0.02053875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02053875 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1056919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 13:24:10
-
Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022)
0.00
8.5578125E-4 = product of:
0.00684625 = sum of:
0.00684625 = product of:
0.02053875 = sum of:
0.02053875 = weight(_text_:29 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02053875 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1056919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030045848 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.
