Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.23 
    0.22624099 = product of:
  0.45248199 = sum of:
    0.45248199 = sum of:
      0.41209087 = weight(_text_:styles in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.41209087 = score(doc=4341,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          1.2060891 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.04039111 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04039111 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049686626 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Undergraduates were tested to establish how they searched databases, the effectiveness of their searches and their satisfaction with them. The students' cognitive and learning styles were determined by the Lancaster Approaches to Studying Inventory and Riding's Cognitive Styles Analysis tests. There were significant differences in the searching behaviour and the effectiveness of the searches carried out by students with different learning and cognitive styles. Computer-assisted learning (CAL) packages were developed for three departments. The effectiveness of the packages were evaluated. Significant differences were found in the ways students with different learning styles used the packages. Based on the experience gained, guidelines for the teaching of information skills and the production and use of packages were prepared. About 2/3 of the searches had serious weaknesses, indicating a need for effective training. It appears that choice of searching strategies, search effectiveness and use of CAL packages are all affected by the cognitive and learning styles of the searcher. Therefore, students should be made aware of their own styles and, if appropriate, how to adopt more effective strategies
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  2. Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990) 0.10 
    0.10383715 = product of:
  0.2076743 = sum of:
    0.2076743 = product of:
      0.4153486 = sum of:
        0.4153486 = weight(_text_:styles in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4153486 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            1.2156236 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Nicholas, D.: Are information professionals really better online searchers than end-users? : (and whose story do you believe?) (1995) 0.06 
    0.064245954 = product of:
  0.12849191 = sum of:
    0.12849191 = product of:
      0.25698382 = sum of:
        0.25698382 = weight(_text_:styles in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25698382 = score(doc=3871,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.7521287 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examines the searching behaviour of Guardian journalists searching FT PROFILE online system. Using transactional log analysis compares the searching styles of journalists with those of Guardian librarians. In some respects end users conform to the picture that professionals have of them - they search with a very limited range of commands - but in other respects they confound that image - they are very quick and economical searchers. Their behaviour relates to their general information seeking behaviour, and their searching styles would be seen in this regard
  4. Fidel, R.: Online searching styles : a case-study-based model of searching behavior (1984) 0.06 
    0.05506796 = product of:
  0.11013592 = sum of:
    0.11013592 = product of:
      0.22027184 = sum of:
        0.22027184 = weight(_text_:styles in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22027184 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.64468175 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The model of operationalist and conceptualist searching styles describes searching behavior of experienced online searchers. It is based on the systematic observation of five experienced online searchers doing their regular, job-related searches, and on the analysis of 10 to 13 searches conducted by each of them. Operationalist searchers aim at optimal strategies to achieve precise retrieval; they use a large range of system capabilities in their interaction. They preserve the specific meaning of the request, and the aim of their interactions is an answer set representing the request precisely. Conceptualist searchers analyze a request by seeking to fit it into a faceted structure. They first enter the facet that represents the most important aspect of the request. Their search is then centered on retrieving subsets from this primary set by introducing additional facets. In contrast to the operationalists, they are primarily concerned with recall. During the interaction they preserve the faceted structure, but may change the specific meaning of the request. Although not comprehensive, the model aids in recognizing special and individual characteristics of searching behavior which provide explanations of previous research and guidelines for further investigations into the search process
  5. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.06 
    0.05506796 = product of:
  0.11013592 = sum of:
    0.11013592 = product of:
      0.22027184 = sum of:
        0.22027184 = weight(_text_:styles in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22027184 = score(doc=6890,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.64468175 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    How postings information is used for inverted file searching was investigated by comparing searches, made by postgraduate students at the Dept. of Information Studies, of the LISA database on CD-ROM with and without postings information. Performance (the number of relevant references, precision and recall) was not significantly different but searches with postings information took more time, and more sets were viewed, than in searches without postings. Postings information was used to make decisions to narrow or broaden the search; to view or print the references. The same techniques were used to amend searches whether or not postings information was available. Users decided that a search was satisfactory on the basis of the search results, and consequently many searches done without postings were still considered satisfactory. However, searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Differences in search performance and searching behaviour were found in participants who were shown to have different learning styles using the Witkin's Embedded Figures test and the Lancaster Short Inventory of Approaches to Learning Test. These differences were, in part, explained by the differences in behaviour indicated by their learning styles
  6. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  7. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  8. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  9. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  10. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02 
    0.01682963 = product of:
  0.03365926 = sum of:
    0.03365926 = product of:
      0.06731852 = sum of:
        0.06731852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06731852 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  11. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02 
    0.01682963 = product of:
  0.03365926 = sum of:
    0.03365926 = product of:
      0.06731852 = sum of:
        0.06731852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06731852 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  12. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02 
    0.01682963 = product of:
  0.03365926 = sum of:
    0.03365926 = product of:
      0.06731852 = sum of:
        0.06731852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06731852 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  13. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  14. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  15. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  17. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  18. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  19. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  20. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 3
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 36
  • s 3
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes