Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Shah, C."
  1. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking : the art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all (2012) 0.09
    0.08851315 = product of:
      0.23603508 = sum of:
        0.10403827 = weight(_text_:supported in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10403827 = score(doc=360,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.4533344 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
        0.08585433 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08585433 = score(doc=360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.37211776 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Today's complex, information-intensive problems often require people to work together. Mostly these tasks go far beyond simply searching together; they include information lookup, sharing, synthesis, and decision-making. In addition, they all have an end-goal that is mutually beneficial to all parties involved. Such "collaborative information seeking" (CIS) projects typically last several sessions and the participants all share an intention to contribute and benefit. Not surprisingly, these processes are highly interactive. Shah focuses on two individually well-understood notions: collaboration and information seeking, with the goal of bringing them together to show how it is a natural tendency for humans to work together on complex tasks. The first part of his book introduces the general notions of collaboration and information seeking, as well as related concepts, terminology, and frameworks; and thus provides the reader with a comprehensive treatment of the concepts underlying CIS. The second part of the book details CIS as a standalone domain. A series of frameworks, theories, and models are introduced to provide a conceptual basis for CIS. The final part describes several systems and applications of CIS, along with their broader implications on other fields such as computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) and human-computer interaction (HCI). With this first comprehensive overview of an exciting new research field, Shah delivers to graduate students and researchers in academia and industry an encompassing description of the technologies involved, state-of-the-art results, and open challenges as well as research opportunities.
    Content
    Inhalt: Part I Introduction.- Introduction.- Collaboration.- Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) in Context.- Part II Conceptual Understanding of CIS.- Frameworks for CIS Research and Development.- Toward a Model for CIS.- Part III CIS Systems, Applications, and Implications.- Systems and Tools for CIS.- Evaluation.- Conclusion.- Ten Stories of Five Cs.- Brief Overview of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).- Brief Overview of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL).- Brief Overview of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC).
  2. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking (2014) 0.08
    0.08357003 = product of:
      0.22285342 = sum of:
        0.10618362 = weight(_text_:supported in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10618362 = score(doc=1193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.4626825 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
        0.07588523 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07588523 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32890874 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
        0.040784575 = weight(_text_:work in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040784575 = score(doc=1193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28674924 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The notions that information seeking is not always a solitary activity and that people working in collaboration for information intensive tasks should be studied and supported have become more prevalent in recent years. Several new research questions, methodologies, and systems have emerged around these notions that may prove to be useful beyond the field of collaborative information seeking (CIS), with relevance to the broader area of information seeking and behavior. This article provides an overview of such key research work from a variety of domains, including library and information science, computer-supported cooperative work, human-computer interaction, and information retrieval. It starts with explanations of collaboration and how CIS fits in different contexts, emphasizing the interactive, intentional, and mutually beneficial nature of CIS activities. Relations to similar and related fields such as collaborative information retrieval, collaborative information behavior, and collaborative filtering are also clarified. Next, the article presents a synthesis of various frameworks and models that exist in the field today, along with a new synthesis of 12 different dimensions of group activities. A discussion on issues and approaches relating to evaluating various parameters in CIS follows. Finally, a list of known issues and challenges is presented to provide an overview of research opportunities in this field.
  3. Shah, C.: Social information seeking : leveraging the wisdom of the crowd (2017) 0.01
    0.005098072 = product of:
      0.040784575 = sum of:
        0.040784575 = weight(_text_:work in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040784575 = score(doc=4260,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28674924 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This volume summarizes the author's work on social information seeking (SIS), and at the same time serves as an introduction to the topic. Sometimes also referred to as social search or social information retrieval, this is a relatively new area of study concerned with the seeking and acquiring of information from social spaces on the Internet. It involves studying situations, motivations, and methods involved in seeking and sharing of information in participatory online social sites, such as Yahoo! Answers, WikiAnswers, and Twitter, as well as building systems for supporting such activities. The first part of the book introduces various foundational concepts, including information seeking, social media, and social networking. As such it provides the necessary basis to then discuss how those aspects could intertwine in different ways to create methods, tools, and opportunities for supporting and leveraging SIS. Next, Part II discusses the social dimension and primarily examines the online question-answering activity. Part III then emphasizes the collaborative aspect of information seeking, and examines what happens when social and collaborative dimensions are considered together. Lastly, Part IV provides a synthesis by consolidating methods, systems, and evaluation techniques related to social and collaborative information seeking. The book is completed by a list of challenges and opportunities for both theoretical and practical SIS work. The book is intended mainly for researchers and graduate students looking for an introduction to this new field, as well as developers and system designers interested in building interactive information retrieval systems or social/community-driven interfaces.
  4. Shah, C.; Marchionini, G.: Awareness in collaborative information seeking (2010) 0.00
    0.004325858 = product of:
      0.034606863 = sum of:
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=4082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Support for explicit collaboration in information-seeking activities is increasingly recognized as a desideratum for search systems. Several tools have emerged recently that help groups of people with the same information-seeking goals to work together. Many issues for these collaborative information-seeking (CIS) environments remain understudied. The authors identified awareness as one of these issues in CIS, and they presented a user study that involved 42 pairs of participants, who worked in collaboration over 2 sessions with 3 instances of the authors' CIS system for exploratory search. They showed that while having awareness of personal actions and history is important for exploratory search tasks spanning multiple sessions, support for group awareness is even more significant for effective collaboration. In addition, they showed that support for such group awareness can be provided without compromising usability or introducing additional load on the users.
  5. Shah, C.; Hendahewa, C.; González-Ibáñez, R.: Rain or shine? : forecasting search process performance in exploratory search tasks (2016) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=3012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Most information retrieval (IR) systems consider relevance, usefulness, and quality of information objects (documents, queries) for evaluation, prediction, and recommendation, often ignoring the underlying search process of information seeking. This may leave out opportunities for making recommendations that analyze the search process and/or recommend alternative search process instead of objects. To overcome this limitation, we investigated whether by analyzing a searcher's current processes we could forecast his likelihood of achieving a certain level of success with respect to search performance in the future. We propose a machine-learning-based method to dynamically evaluate and predict search performance several time-steps ahead at each given time point of the search process during an exploratory search task. Our prediction method uses a collection of features extracted from expression of information need and coverage of information. For testing, we used log data collected from 4 user studies that included 216 users (96 individuals and 60 pairs). Our results show 80-90% accuracy in prediction depending on the number of time-steps ahead. In effect, the work reported here provides a framework for evaluating search processes during exploratory search tasks and predicting search performance. Importantly, the proposed approach is based on user processes and is independent of any IR system.
  6. Radford, M.L.; Connaway, L.S.; Mikitish, S.; Alpert, M.; Shah, C.; Cooke, N.A.: Shared values, new vision : collaboration and communities of practice in virtual reference and SQA (2017) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This investigation of new approaches to improving collaboration, user/librarian experiences, and sustainability for virtual reference services (VRS) reports findings from a grant project titled "Cyber Synergy: Seeking Sustainability between Virtual Reference and Social Q&A Sites" (Radford, Connaway, & Shah, 2011-2014). In-depth telephone interviews with 50 VRS librarians included questions on collaboration, referral practices, and attitudes toward Social Question and Answer (SQA) services using the Critical Incident Technique (Flanagan, 1954). The Community of Practice (CoP) (Wenger, 1998; Davies, 2005) framework was found to be a useful conceptualization for understanding VRS professionals' approaches to their work. Findings indicate that participants usually refer questions from outside of their area of expertise to other librarians, but occasionally refer them to nonlibrarian experts. These referrals are made possible because participants believe that other VRS librarians are qualified and willing collaborators. Barriers to collaboration include not knowing appropriate librarians/experts for referral, inability to verify credentials, and perceived unwillingness to collaborate. Facilitators to collaboration include knowledge of appropriate collaborators who are qualified and willingness to refer. Answers from SQA services were perceived as less objective and authoritative, but participants were open to collaborating with nonlibrarian experts with confirmation of professional expertise or extensive knowledge.
  7. Wang, Y.; Shah, C.: Investigating failures in information seeking episodes (2017) 0.00
    0.00164069 = product of:
      0.01312552 = sum of:
        0.01312552 = product of:
          0.02625104 = sum of:
            0.02625104 = weight(_text_:22 in 2922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02625104 = score(doc=2922,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2922, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2922)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22