Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"AZC (E)"
  1. Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly intent (2014) 0.02
    0.024198357 = product of:
      0.09679343 = sum of:
        0.02307124 = weight(_text_:work in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02307124 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.07372219 = product of:
          0.14744438 = sum of:
            0.14744438 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14744438 = score(doc=3026,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25424787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.57992375 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Scholars and scripts, spoors and scores / Blaise CroninHistory and evolution of (biblio)metrics / Nicola De Bellis -- The citation : from culture to infrastructure / Paul Wouters -- The data it is me! / Ronald E. Day -- The ethics of evaluative bibliometrics / Jonathan Furner -- Criteria for evaluating indicators / Yves Gingras -- Obliteration by incorporation / Katherine W. McCain -- A network approach to scholarly evaluation / Jevin D. West and Daril A. Vilhena -- Science visualization and discursive knowledge / Loet Leydesdorff -- Measuring interdisciplinarity / Vincent Larivière and Yves Gingras -- Bibliometric standards for evaluating research institutes in the natural sciences / Lutz Bornmann, Benjamin E. Bowman, Jonathan Bauer, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier and Margit Palzenberger -- Identifying and quantifying research strengths using market segmentation / Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans -- Finding and recommending scholarly articles / Michael J. Kurtz and Edwin A. Henneken -- Altmetrics / Jason Priem -- Web impact measures for research assessment / Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall -- Bibliographic references in Web 2.0 / Judit Bar-Illan, Hadas Shema and Mike Thelwall -- Readership metrics / Stefanie Haustein -- Evaluating the work of judges / Peter Hook -- Academic genealogy / Cassidy R. Sugimoto -- A publishing perspective on bibliometrics / Judith Kamalski, Andrew Plume and Mayur Amin -- Science metrics and science policy / Julia Lane, Mark Largent and Rebecca Rosen.
    RSWK
    Bibliometrie / Aufsatzsammlung
    Altmetrische Daten / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliometrie / Aufsatzsammlung
    Altmetrische Daten / Aufsatzsammlung
  2. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Aims to inform researchers about metrics so that they become aware of the evaluative techniques being applied to their scientific output. Understanding these concepts will help them during their funding initiatives, and in hiring and tenure. The book not only describes what indicators do (or are designed to do, which is not always the same thing), but also gives precise mathematical formulae so that indicators can be properly understood and evaluated. Metrics have become a critical issue in science, with widespread international discussion taking place on the subject across scientific journals and organizations. As researchers should know the publication-citation context, the mathematical formulae of indicators being used by evaluating committees and their consequences, and how such indicators might be misused, this book provides an ideal tome on the topic. Provides researchers with a detailed understanding of bibliometric indicators and their applications. Empowers researchers looking to understand the indicators relevant to their work and careers. Presents an informed and rounded picture of bibliometrics, including the strengths and shortcomings of particular indicators. Supplies the mathematics behind bibliometric indicators so they can be properly understood. Written by authors with longstanding expertise who are considered global leaders in the field of bibliometrics
  3. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  4. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.00
    0.002523417 = product of:
      0.020187335 = sum of:
        0.020187335 = weight(_text_:work in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020187335 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.14193363 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This is a practical guide to using web metrics to measure impact and demonstrate value. The web provides an opportunity to collect a host of different metrics, from those associated with social media accounts and websites to more traditional research outputs. This book is a clear guide for library and information professionals as to what web metrics are available and how to assess and use them to make informed decisions and demonstrate value. As individuals and organizations increasingly use the web in addition to traditional publishing avenues and formats, this book provides the tools to unlock web metrics and evaluate the impact of this content. The key topics covered include: bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics; data collection tools; evaluating impact on the web; evaluating social media impact; investigating relationships between actors; exploring traditional publications in a new environment; web metrics and the web of data; the future of web metrics and the library and information professional. The book will provide a practical introduction to web metrics for a wide range of library and information professionals, from the bibliometrician wanting to demonstrate the wider impact of a researcher's work than can be demonstrated through traditional citations databases, to the reference librarian wanting to measure how successfully they are engaging with their users on Twitter. It will be a valuable tool for anyone who wants to not only understand the impact of content, but demonstrate this impact to others within the organization and beyond.