Search (121 results, page 1 of 7)

0.075762376 = product of:
  0.3030495 = sum of:
    0.27154827 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27154827 = score(doc=4711,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        1.1462607 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
    0.031501245 = product of:
      0.06300249 = sum of:
        0.06300249 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06300249 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Date

27.10.2001 12:22:54

Source

Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger

0.063041024 = product of:
  0.2521641 = sum of:
    0.16001137 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 2039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16001137 = score(doc=2039,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.67544067 = fieldWeight in 2039, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2039)
    0.09215274 = product of:
      0.18430547 = sum of:
        0.18430547 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 2039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18430547 = score(doc=2039,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25424787 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.72490466 = fieldWeight in 2039, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2039)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: BALL, R.: Wissenschaft und Bibliotheken: Das aktive Engagement im Kontext elektronischen Publizierens; HUTZLER, E.: Elektronische Zeitschriften in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken; LOSSAU, N.: Retro-Digitalisierung; PHILIPP, J.: Virtueller Marktplatz für Bildung und Wissenschaft; THISSEN, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren oder elektronisches Kommunizieren: Hochschuldidaktik und Bibliotheken; MÜLLER, H.: Die rechtlichen Zusammenhänge im Rahmen des elektronischen Publizierens; BILO, A.: Anpassung oder Strukturwandel: Elektronische Publikationen und digitale Bibliotheken aus der Sicht bibliothekarischer Praxis; CÖLFEN, H. u. U. SCHMITZ: Hochschullehre im Internet: Anspruch und Praxis; REINHARDT, W.: Elektronische Dokumente im Bestandsaufbau wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken; WEIß, B.: Dublin Core; MÖNNICH, M.: Formate und Datenbanken; KLOTZ-BERENDES, B. u. G. SCHÖNFELDER: Sicherungsverfahren für den Betrieb eines Dokumentenservers; HILF, E. u. K. ZIMMERMANN: Dissertationen via Internet; HOFFMANN, H.-W.: Kooperationen und Vernetzungen: Die Rolle der Verbünde; SCHWENS, U.: Die Rolle Der Deutschen Bibliothek; KELLER, A.: Elektronischer Zeitschriften: Eine Publikationsform mit Zukunft?; BERG, H.-P.: Nutzungsuntersuchungen für elektronische Publikationen; HOBOHM, H.-C.: Marketing elektronischer Publikationen; OßWALD, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner; KAMKE, H.-U.: Autorenbetreuung; NAYLOR, B.: Electronic publications in higher education librares in the UK, RUSCH-FEJA, D.: E-Publishing in Hochschulbibliotheken in den USA; ALTENHÖNER, R.: Entwicklung und Erprobung einer neuen multimedial unterstützen Lehr- und Lernform; REUTER, C. u. H. TRINKS-SCHULZ: Lernort Hochschulbibliothek; SCHOLZE, F.: Einbindung elektronischer Hochschulschriften in den Verbundkontext am Beispiel OPUS

RSWK

Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek / Elektronisches Publizieren / Aufsatzsammlung (213)
Hochschule / Elektronisches Publizieren / Aufsatzsammlung (213)

Subject

Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek / Elektronisches Publizieren / Aufsatzsammlung (213)
Hochschule / Elektronisches Publizieren / Aufsatzsammlung (213)

0.055878717 = product of:
  0.22351487 = sum of:
    0.19201362 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19201362 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.81052876 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
    0.031501245 = product of:
      0.06300249 = sum of:
        0.06300249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06300249 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

MATEO - Mannheimer Texte Online - ist der erste Online-Verlag an einer deutschen Hochschule

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38

0.024001703 = product of:
  0.19201362 = sum of:
    0.19201362 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19201362 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.81052876 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger

0.024001703 = product of:
  0.19201362 = sum of:
    0.19201362 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19201362 = score(doc=4527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.81052876 = fieldWeight in 4527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4527)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger

0.024001703 = product of:
  0.19201362 = sum of:
    0.19201362 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 6116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19201362 = score(doc=6116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.81052876 = fieldWeight in 6116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6116)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger

0.022215374 = product of:
  0.088861495 = sum of:
    0.06439075 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06439075 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.27908832 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
    0.024470747 = weight(_text_:work in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024470747 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.17204955 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.

0.020982286 = product of:
  0.083929144 = sum of:
    0.057678103 = weight(_text_:work in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057678103 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
    0.02625104 = product of:
      0.05250208 = sum of:
        0.05250208 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250208 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies

Source

IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22

0.016785828 = product of:
  0.06714331 = sum of:
    0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04614248 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.021000832 = product of:
      0.042001665 = sum of:
        0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042001665 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal

Date

22. 2.1999 16:56:06

0.015708642 = product of:
  0.06283457 = sum of:
    0.04553114 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04553114 = score(doc=1222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.19734526 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
    0.017303431 = weight(_text_:work in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017303431 = score(doc=1222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.1216574 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

CrossRef, the only full-blown application of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System to date, is now a little over a year old. What started as a cooperative effort among publishers and technologists to prototype DOI-based linking of citations in e-journals evolved into an independent, non-profit enterprise in early 2000. We have made considerable headway during our first year, but there is still much to be done. When CrossRef went live with its collaborative linking service last June, it had enabled reference links in roughly 1,100 journals from a member base of 33 publishers, using a functional prototype system. The DOI-X prototype was described in an article published in D-Lib Magazine in February of 2000. On the occasion of CrossRef's first birthday as a live service, this article provides a non-technical overview of our progress to date and the major hurdles ahead. The electronic medium enriches the research literature arena for all players -- researchers, librarians, and publishers -- in numerous ways. Information has been made easier to discover, to share, and to sell. To take a simple example, the aggregation of book metadata by electronic booksellers was a huge boon to scholars seeking out obscure backlist titles, or discovering books they would never otherwise have known to exist. It was equally a boon for the publishers of those books, who saw an unprecedented surge in sales of backlist titles with the advent of centralized electronic bookselling. In the serials sphere, even in spite of price increases and the turmoil surrounding site licenses for some prime electronic content, libraries overall are now able to offer more content to more of their patrons. Yet undoubtedly, the key enrichment for academics and others navigating a scholarly corpus is linking, and in particular the linking that takes the reader out of one document and into another in the matter of a click or two. Since references are how authors make explicit the links between their work and precedent scholarship, what could be more fundamental to the reader than making those links immediately actionable? That said, automated linking is only really useful from a research perspective if it works across publications and across publishers. Not only do academics think about their own writings and those of their colleagues in terms of "author, title, rough date" -- the name of the journal itself is usually not high on the list of crucial identifying features -- but they are oblivious as to the identity of the publishers of all but their very favorite books and journals.

0.01501663 = product of:
  0.12013304 = sum of:
    0.12013304 = weight(_text_:supported in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12013304 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.52346545 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Extensible Markup Language (XML) attempts to overcome the limitations of HyperText Markup Language (HTML) by offering the ability to deploy more sophisticated documents anc exchange complex data over the WWW. A simplified version of SGML, XML has been developed by the WWW Consortium (W3C), is at first draft stage with the W3C and is supported by the latest version of Netscape and Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0

0.012589371 = product of:
  0.050357483 = sum of:
    0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034606863 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
    0.015750622 = product of:
      0.031501245 = sum of:
        0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031501245 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:59:25

0.01140332 = product of:
  0.09122656 = sum of:
    0.09122656 = product of:
      0.18245313 = sum of:
        0.18245313 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18245313 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25424787 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.71761906 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

RSWK

Internet / Elektronisches Publizieren / Urheberrecht / Preispolitik / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Internet / Elektronisches Publizieren / Urheberrecht / Preispolitik / Aufsatzsammlung

0.01000071 = product of:
  0.08000568 = sum of:
    0.08000568 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08000568 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Footnote

Zugl.: Pforzheim, Hochschule, Diplomarbeit, 2002 u.d.T.: Erbarth, Matthias: Abbildung einer Publikation als semantisches Netz unter Verwendung von XML-Technologien

0.009385394 = product of:
  0.07508315 = sum of:
    0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07508315 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Increasingly, e-books are becoming alternatives to print books in academic libraries, thus providing opportunities to assess how well the use of e-books meets the requirements of academics. This study uses the task-technology fit (TTF) model to explore the interrelationships of e-books, the affordances offered by smart readers, the information needs of academics, and the "fit" of technology to tasks as well as performance. We propose that the adoption of e-books will be dependent on how academics perceive the fit of this new medium to the tasks they undertake as well as what added-value functionality is delivered by the information technology that delivers the content. The study used content analysis and an online survey, administered to the faculty in Medicine, Science and Engineering at the University of New South Wales, to identify the attributes of a TTF construct of e-books in academic settings. Using exploratory factor analysis, preliminary findings confirmed annotation, navigation, and output as the core dimensions of the TTF construct. The results of confirmatory factor analysis using partial least squares path modeling supported the overall TTF model in reflecting significant positive impact of task, technology, and individual characteristics on TTF for e-books in academic settings; it also confirmed significant positive impact of TTF on individuals' performance and use, and impact of using e-books on individual performance. Our research makes two contributions: the development of an e-book TTF construct and the testing of that construct in a model validating the efficacy of the TTF framework in measuring perceived fit of e-books to academic tasks.

0.007508315 = product of:
  0.06006652 = sum of:
    0.06006652 = weight(_text_:supported in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06006652 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.26173273 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Grey Literature and Open Access publications have the potential to become the basis of new types of scientific publications, in which scientific discourse and collaboration can play a central role in the dissemination of knowledge, due to their machine-readable format and electronic availability. With advances in cyber science and e-(Social) Science, an increasing number of scientific publications are required to be shared with different group members or even within communities in virtual reading environments. However, the most often used format for publishing articles on the web is still the Adobe PDF format, which limits the extent to which readers of an article can interact with online content and within their browser environment. This not only separates the formal communication - the article itself - from the informal communication about a publication - the discussion about the article - but also fails to link the different threads of communications which might appear in parallel at different locations in the scientific community as a whole. Analysis of around 30 web sites where different ways for presenting formal and informal communications were conducted shows in the identification of several prototypes of media combinations which were then evaluated against human factor aspects (distance between related information, arrangement of related information etc). Based on this evaluation we concluded that at the time of analysis, no model exist for directly integrating formal and informal communication to a single media, allowing readers of publications to directly discuss within the publication, e.g. to extend the publication with their input directly at the paragraph they wanted to comment. Therefore, a new publishing medium is necessary to fulfil the gap between the formal and informal communication, facilitating and engaging academic readers' active participating in the online scientific discourse. We have developed an online discussion service, which allows interactive features for annotation directly available at the point in the publication to which the comment refers to. Besides the exchange of ideas and the stimulation of discourse across portals and communities we approach at the same time to create a new basis for research in scientific discourse, networking and collaboration. This is supported by linking from the individual article to other publications or information items in digital libraries.

0.007209763 = product of:
  0.057678103 = sum of:
    0.057678103 = weight(_text_:work in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057678103 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Looks at how electronic versions of newspapers can help, or hinder the work of information professionals. Gives an overview of the types of services newspapers have begun providing and features available through these services that can help seekers of news text

0.007209763 = product of:
  0.057678103 = sum of:
    0.057678103 = weight(_text_:work in 3476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057678103 = score(doc=3476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 3476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3476)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Discusses copyright and electronic document delivery. However copyright is implemented legally, the principle of protecting an author's work remains the same. Offers collective management as a solution

0.00656276 = product of:
  0.05250208 = sum of:
    0.05250208 = product of:
      0.10500416 = sum of:
        0.10500416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10500416 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.006448608 = product of:
  0.051588863 = sum of:
    0.051588863 = weight(_text_:work in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051588863 = score(doc=4997,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3627123 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study current policies and practices of scholarly journals on evaluating manuscripts for publication that had been previously published electronically. Various electronic forms were considered: a manuscript having been e-mailed to members of a listserv, attached to a personal or institutional home page, stored in an electronic preprint collection, or published in an electronic proceedings or electronic journal. Factors that might affect the consideration of such manuscripts were also examined, including characteristics of the journal, the previously published work, and the submitted manuscript. A sample of 202 scholarly journals in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities was selected for study. A questionnaire and cover letters were sent to the journal editors in the summer and fall of 1997, with an overall return rate of 57.4%. Results are reported for all journals, with comparisons being made between journals edited in the Unites States and outside the Unites States, by journal impact factor, and by discipline. The findings suggest that editorial policies regarding prior electronic publication are in an early stage of development. Most journal editors do not have a formal policy regarding the evaluation of work previously published in electronic form, nor are they currently evaluating such a policy. Editors disagreed widely on the importance of the various factors that might affect their decision to consider a work previously published electronically. The form or type of prior electronic publication was an important variable. Although some editors currently have a fairly rigid and negative posture towards work previously published electronically, most are willing to consider certain forms of such work for publication in their journals. Probably the most significant results of the study were the many differences in practices among scholarly disciplines. The findings of this study reveal how the Internet and the World Wide Web are currently affecting manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals at this early stage of Web and Internet publishing