-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.27
0.2692666 = product of:
0.7180443 = sum of:
0.10257776 = product of:
0.30773327 = sum of:
0.30773327 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30773327 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.30773327 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30773327 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.30773327 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30773327 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.22
0.21541327 = product of:
0.5744354 = sum of:
0.0820622 = product of:
0.2461866 = sum of:
0.2461866 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2461866 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2461866 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2461866 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.2461866 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2461866 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.13
0.1346333 = product of:
0.35902214 = sum of:
0.05128888 = product of:
0.15386663 = sum of:
0.15386663 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15386663 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15386663 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15386663 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Teets, M.; Murray, P.: Metasearch authentication and access management (2006)
0.03
0.033755668 = product of:
0.13502267 = sum of:
0.10618362 = weight(_text_:supported in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10618362 = score(doc=1154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.4626825 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028839052 = score(doc=1154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Metasearch - also called parallel search, federated search, broadcast search, and cross-database search - has become commonplace in the information community's vocabulary. All speak to a common theme of searching and retrieving from multiple databases, sources, platforms, protocols, and vendors at the point of the user's request. Metasearch services rely on a variety of approaches including open standards (such as NISO's Z39.50 and SRU/SRW), proprietary programming interfaces, and "screen scraping." However, the absence of widely supported standards, best practices, and tools makes the metasearch environment less efficient for the metasearch provider, the content provider, and ultimately the end-user. To spur the development of widely supported standards and best practices, the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) sponsored a Metasearch Initiative in 2003 to enable: * metasearch service providers to offer more effective and responsive services, * content providers to deliver enhanced content and protect their intellectual property, and * libraries to deliver a simple search (a.k.a. "Google") that covers the breadth of their vetted commercial and free resources. The Access Management Task Group was one of three groups chartered by NISO as part of the Metasearch Initiative. The focus of the group was on gathering requirements for Metasearch authentication and access needs, inventorying existing processes, developing a series of formal use cases describing the access needs, recommending best practices given today's processes, and recommending and pursing changes to current solutions to better support metasearch applications. In September 2005, the group issued their final report and recommendation. This article summarizes the group's work and final recommendation.
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.03
0.032595918 = product of:
0.13038367 = sum of:
0.112007946 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112007946 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.47280845 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.018375728 = product of:
0.036751457 = sum of:
0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036751457 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
-
Hitchcock, S.; Bergmark, D.; Brody, T.; Gutteridge, C.; Carr, L.; Hall, W.; Lagoze, C.; Harnad, S.: Open citation linking : the way forward (2002)
0.03
0.031258464 = product of:
0.12503386 = sum of:
0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07508315 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.049950704 = weight(_text_:work in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049950704 = score(doc=1207,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.35119468 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The speed of scientific communication - the rate of ideas affecting other researchers' ideas - is increasing dramatically. The factor driving this is free, unrestricted access to research papers. Measurements of user activity in mature eprint archives of research papers such as arXiv have shown, for the first time, the degree to which such services support an evolving network of texts commenting on, citing, classifying, abstracting, listing and revising other texts. The Open Citation project has built tools to measure this activity, to build new archives, and has been closely involved with the development of the infrastructure to support open access on which these new services depend. This is the story of the project, intertwined with the concurrent emergence of the Open Archives Initiative (OAI). The paper describes the broad scope of the project's work, showing how it has progressed from early demonstrators of reference linking to produce Citebase, a Web-based citation and impact-ranked search service, and how it has supported the development of the EPrints.org software for building OAI-compliant archives. The work has been underpinned by analysis and experiments on the semantics of documents (digital objects) to determine the features required for formally perfect linking - instantiated as an application programming interface (API) for reference linking - that will enable other applications to build on this work in broader digital library information environments.
-
Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016)
0.03
0.027939359 = product of:
0.111757435 = sum of:
0.09600681 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09600681 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.015750622 = product of:
0.031501245 = sum of:
0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031501245 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://yis.univie.ac.at/index.php/yis/article/view/1324/1234. Diesem Beitrag liegt folgende Abschlussarbeit zugrunde: Lamparter, Anna: Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals in Unternehmen. Masterarbeit (M.A.), Hochschule Hannover, 2015. Volltext: https://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/528 Vgl. auch: (geb. Lamparter): Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen. In:
- Date
- 28. 7.2016 16:22:54
-
Babeu, A.: Building a "FRBR-inspired" catalog : the Perseus digital library experience (2008)
0.03
0.027913846 = product of:
0.111655384 = sum of:
0.06006652 = weight(_text_:supported in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06006652 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.26173273 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.051588863 = weight(_text_:work in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051588863 = score(doc=2429,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.3627123 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- If one follows any of the major cataloging or library blogs these days, it is obvious that the topic of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) has increasingly become one of major significance for the library community. What began as a proposed conceptual entity-relationship model for improving the structure of bibliographic records has become a hotly debated topic with many tangled threads that have implications not just for cataloging but for many aspects of libraries and librarianship. In the fall of 2005, the Perseus Project experimented with creating a FRBRized catalog for its current online classics collection, a collection that consists of several hundred classical texts in Greek and Latin as well as reference works and scholarly commentaries regarding these works. In the last two years, with funding from the Mellon Foundation, Perseus has amassed and digitized a growing collection of classical texts (some as image books on our own servers that will eventually be made available through Fedora), and some available through the Open Content Alliance (OCA)2, and created FRBRized cataloging data for these texts. This work was done largely as an experiment to see the potential of the FRBR model for creating a specialized catalog for classics.
Our catalog should not be called a FRBR catalog perhaps, but instead a "FRBR Inspired catalog." As such our main goal has been "practical findability," we are seeking to support the four identified user tasks of the FRBR model, or to "Search, Identify, Select, and Obtain," rather than to create a FRBR catalog, per se. By encoding as much information as possible in the MODS and MADS records we have created, we believe that useful searching will be supported, that by using unique identifiers for works and authors users will be able to identify that the entity they have located is the desired one, that by encoding expression level information (such as the language of the work, the translator, etc) users will be able to select which expression of a work they are interested in, and that by supplying links to different online manifestations that users will be able to obtain access to a digital copy of a work. This white paper will discuss previous and current efforts by the Perseus Project in creating a FRBRized catalog, including the cataloging workflow, lessons learned during the process and will also seek to place this work in the larger context of research regarding FRBR, cataloging, Library 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and the growing importance of the FRBR model in the face of growing million book digital libraries.
-
Stelzenmüller, C.: Mashups in Bibliotheken : Untersuchung der Verbreitung von Mashups auf Webseiten wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken und Erstellung eines praktischen Beispiels (2008)
0.02
0.022629023 = product of:
0.18103218 = sum of:
0.18103218 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18103218 = score(doc=3069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.76417387 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Bachelor-Arbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement an der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart.
- Imprint
- Stuttgart : Hochschule der Medien
-
Haas, M.: Methoden der künstlichen Intelligenz in betriebswirtschaftlichen Anwendungen (2006)
0.02
0.022629023 = product of:
0.18103218 = sum of:
0.18103218 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18103218 = score(doc=4499,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.76417387 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Content
- Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des Grades eines Diplom-Wirtschaftsinformatikers (FH) der Hochschule Wismar. Vgl.: http://www.wi.hs-wismar.de/~cleve/vorl/projects/da/DA-FS-Haas.pdf.
- Imprint
- Wismar : Hochschule Wismar; Fachbereich Wirtschaft
-
Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004)
0.02
0.022215374 = product of:
0.088861495 = sum of:
0.06439075 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06439075 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.27908832 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
0.024470747 = weight(_text_:work in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024470747 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.17204955 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
-
Hill, L.: New Protocols for Gazetteer and Thesaurus Services (2002)
0.02
0.020784441 = product of:
0.083137766 = sum of:
0.06006652 = weight(_text_:supported in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06006652 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.26173273 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.02307124 = weight(_text_:work in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02307124 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The Alexandria Digital Library Project announces the online publication of two protocols to support querying and response interactions using distributed services: one for gazetteers and one for thesauri. These protocols have been developed for our own purposes and also to support the general interoperability of gazetteers and thesauri on the web. See <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/gazetteer/> and <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/thesaurus/>. For the gazetteer protocol, we have provided a page of test forms that can be used to experiment with the operational functions of the protocol in accessing two gazetteers: the ADL Gazetteer and the ESRI Gazetteer (ESRI has participated in the development of the gazetteer protocol). We are in the process of developing a thesaurus server and a simple client to demonstrate the use of the thesaurus protocol. We are soliciting comments on both protocols. Please remember that we are seeking protocols that are essentially "simple" and easy to implement and that support basic operations - they should not duplicate all of the functions of specialized gazetteer and thesaurus interfaces. We continue to discuss ways of handling various issues and to further develop the protocols. For the thesaurus protocol, outstanding issues include the treatment of multilingual thesauri and the degree to which the language attribute should be supported; whether the Scope Note element should be changed to a repeatable Note element; the best way to handle the hierarchical report for multi-hierarchies where portions of the hierarchy are repeated; and whether support for searching by term identifiers is redundant and unnecessary given that the terms themselves are unique within a thesaurus. For the gazetteer protocol, we continue to work on validation of query and report XML documents and on implementing the part of the protocol designed to support the submission of new entries to a gazetteer. We would like to encourage open discussion of these protocols through the NKOS discussion list (see the NKOS webpage at <http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/>) and the CGGR-L discussion list that focuses on gazetteer development (see ADL Gazetteer Development page at <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer>).
-
BIBFRAME Relationships (2014)
0.02
0.017660242 = product of:
0.14128193 = sum of:
0.14128193 = weight(_text_:work in 8920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14128193 = score(doc=8920,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.9933286 = fieldWeight in 8920, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8920)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- A BIBFRAME Relationship is a relationship between a BIBFRAME Work or Instance and another BIBFRAME Work or Instance. Thus there are four types of relationships: Work to Work - Work to Instance - Instance to Work - Instance to Instance
-
Nitzschner, H.: Konzeption und Entwicklung eines Online-Tutorials zur Verbesserung der Informationskompetenz von Studierenden der Elektrotechnik/Informationstechnik (2004)
0.02
0.016971767 = product of:
0.13577414 = sum of:
0.13577414 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13577414 = score(doc=728,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.57313037 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Content
- Diplomarbeit an der Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur Leipzig (FH) Fachbereich Buch und Museum Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
- Imprint
- Leipzig : Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur / Fachbereich Buch und Museum
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.02
0.01617303 = product of:
0.06469212 = sum of:
0.048941493 = weight(_text_:work in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048941493 = score(doc=1652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.015750622 = product of:
0.031501245 = sum of:
0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031501245 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This document is the formal definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model ("CRM"), a formal ontology intended to facilitate the integration, mediation and interchange of heterogeneous cultural heritage information. The CRM is the culmination of more than a decade of standards development work by the International Committee for Documentation (CIDOC) of the International Council of Museums (ICOM). Work on the CRM itself began in 1996 under the auspices of the ICOM-CIDOC Documentation Standards Working Group. Since 2000, development of the CRM has been officially delegated by ICOM-CIDOC to the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, which collaborates with the ISO working group ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 to bring the CRM to the form and status of an International Standard.
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Engelbrecht, T.; Lankau, R.: Technologie in unseren Schulen schadet mehr, als sie nützt. (2017)
0.02
0.016001135 = product of:
0.12800908 = sum of:
0.12800908 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12800908 = score(doc=3722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.5403525 = fieldWeight in 3722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3722)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Ralf Lankau, Professor für Mediengestaltung und Medientheorie an der Hochschule Offenburg, über die Petition "Schulpakt Digital ist ein Irrweg der Bildungspolitik - denn Digitaltechnik an Schulen schadet mehr, als sie nützt". Bezugnahme auf das "Schulpakt Digital" von Bundesbildungsministerin Johanna Wanka, das am 1. Juni 2017 durch die Kultusministerkonferenz verabschiedet wurde.
-
Stang, R.: Lehr- und Lernraumforschung im Kontext der Informationswissenschaft : Das Learning Research Center der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart (2019)
0.02
0.016001135 = product of:
0.12800908 = sum of:
0.12800908 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 5374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12800908 = score(doc=5374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.5403525 = fieldWeight in 5374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5374)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023)
0.02
0.01592754 = product of:
0.12742032 = sum of:
0.12742032 = weight(_text_:supported in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12742032 = score(doc=894,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.55521894 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
-
Brand, A.: CrossRef turns one (2001)
0.02
0.015708642 = product of:
0.06283457 = sum of:
0.04553114 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04553114 = score(doc=1222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.19734526 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
0.017303431 = weight(_text_:work in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017303431 = score(doc=1222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.1216574 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- CrossRef, the only full-blown application of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System to date, is now a little over a year old. What started as a cooperative effort among publishers and technologists to prototype DOI-based linking of citations in e-journals evolved into an independent, non-profit enterprise in early 2000. We have made considerable headway during our first year, but there is still much to be done. When CrossRef went live with its collaborative linking service last June, it had enabled reference links in roughly 1,100 journals from a member base of 33 publishers, using a functional prototype system. The DOI-X prototype was described in an article published in D-Lib Magazine in February of 2000. On the occasion of CrossRef's first birthday as a live service, this article provides a non-technical overview of our progress to date and the major hurdles ahead. The electronic medium enriches the research literature arena for all players -- researchers, librarians, and publishers -- in numerous ways. Information has been made easier to discover, to share, and to sell. To take a simple example, the aggregation of book metadata by electronic booksellers was a huge boon to scholars seeking out obscure backlist titles, or discovering books they would never otherwise have known to exist. It was equally a boon for the publishers of those books, who saw an unprecedented surge in sales of backlist titles with the advent of centralized electronic bookselling. In the serials sphere, even in spite of price increases and the turmoil surrounding site licenses for some prime electronic content, libraries overall are now able to offer more content to more of their patrons. Yet undoubtedly, the key enrichment for academics and others navigating a scholarly corpus is linking, and in particular the linking that takes the reader out of one document and into another in the matter of a click or two. Since references are how authors make explicit the links between their work and precedent scholarship, what could be more fundamental to the reader than making those links immediately actionable? That said, automated linking is only really useful from a research perspective if it works across publications and across publishers. Not only do academics think about their own writings and those of their colleagues in terms of "author, title, rough date" -- the name of the journal itself is usually not high on the list of crucial identifying features -- but they are oblivious as to the identity of the publishers of all but their very favorite books and journals.
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.02
0.015708642 = product of:
0.06283457 = sum of:
0.04553114 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04553114 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.19734526 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.017303431 = weight(_text_:work in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017303431 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03875087 = queryNorm
0.1216574 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
The Library of Congress must begin by prioritizing the recommendations that are directed in whole or in part at LC. Some define tasks that can be achieved immediately and with moderate effort; others will require analysis and planning that will have to be coordinated broadly and carefully. The Working Group has consciously not associated time frames with any of its recommendations. The recommendations fall into five general areas: 1. Increase the efficiency of bibliographic production for all libraries through increased cooperation and increased sharing of bibliographic records, and by maximizing the use of data produced throughout the entire "supply chain" for information resources. 2. Transfer effort into higher-value activity. In particular, expand the possibilities for knowledge creation by "exposing" rare and unique materials held by libraries that are currently hidden from view and, thus, underused. 3. Position our technology for the future by recognizing that the World Wide Web is both our technology platform and the appropriate platform for the delivery of our standards. Recognize that people are not the only users of the data we produce in the name of bibliographic control, but so too are machine applications that interact with those data in a variety of ways. 4. Position our community for the future by facilitating the incorporation of evaluative and other user-supplied information into our resource descriptions. Work to realize the potential of the FRBR framework for revealing and capitalizing on the various relationships that exist among information resources. 5. Strengthen the library profession through education and the development of metrics that will inform decision-making now and in the future. The Working Group intends what follows to serve as a broad blueprint for the Library of Congress and its colleagues in the library and information technology communities for extending and promoting access to information resources.
