Search (297 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.24 
    0.23988402 = product of:
  0.47976804 = sum of:
    0.06154665 = product of:
      0.18463995 = sum of:
        0.18463995 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18463995 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.048941493 = weight(_text_:work in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048941493 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.18463995 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18463995 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.18463995 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18463995 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.13 
    0.1346333 = product of:
  0.35902214 = sum of:
    0.05128888 = product of:
      0.15386663 = sum of:
        0.15386663 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Folsom, S.M.: Using the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's past and present to project a Linked Data future (2020) 0.05 
    0.054462783 = product of:
  0.21785113 = sum of:
    0.17170866 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17170866 = score(doc=5747,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.7442355 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
    0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04614248 = score(doc=5747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Drawing on the PCC's history with linked data and related work this article identifies and gives context to pressing areas PCC will need to focus on moving forward. These areas include defining plausible data targets, tractable implementation models and data flows, engaging in related tool development, and participating in the broader linked data community.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  4. Samples, J.; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data (2020) 0.05 
    0.051835872 = product of:
  0.20734349 = sum of:
    0.15024509 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15024509 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.6512061 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
    0.057098407 = weight(_text_:work in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057098407 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  5. Shieh, J.: PCC's work on URIs in MARC (2020) 0.05 
    0.046667922 = product of:
  0.18667169 = sum of:
    0.12141637 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12141637 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.526254 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
    0.06525532 = weight(_text_:work in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06525532 = score(doc=122,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  6. Oesterlund, C.; Jarrahi, M.H.; Willis, M.; Boyd, K.; Wolf, C.T.: Artificial intelligence and the world of work : a co-constitutive relationship (2021) 0.04 
    0.039828375 = product of:
  0.1593135 = sum of:
    0.09009978 = weight(_text_:supported in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009978 = score(doc=5504,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3925991 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
    0.069213726 = weight(_text_:work in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069213726 = score(doc=5504,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    The use of intelligent machines-digital technologies that feature data-driven forms of customization, learning, and autonomous action-is rapidly growing and will continue to impact many industries and domains. This is consequential for communities of researchers, educators, and practitioners concerned with studying, supporting, and educating information professionals. In the face of new developments in artificial intelligence (AI), the research community faces 3 questions: (a) How is AI becoming part of the world of work? (b) How is the world of work becoming part of AI? and (c) How can the information community help address this topic of Work in the Age of Intelligent Machines (WAIM)? This opinion piece considers these 3 questions by drawing on discussion from an engaging 2019 iConference workshop organized by the NSF supported WAIM research coordination network (note: https://waim.network).
  7. Naun, C.C.: Expanding the use of Linked Data value vocabularies in PCC cataloging (2020) 0.04 
    0.036653496 = product of:
  0.14661399 = sum of:
    0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10623932 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
    0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04037467 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  8. Wang, X.; Lin, X.; Shao, B.: Artificial intelligence changes the way we work : a close look at innovating with chatbots (2023) 0.04 
    0.03643103 = product of:
  0.14572412 = sum of:
    0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07508315 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
    0.07064097 = weight(_text_:work in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07064097 = score(doc=902,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.4966643 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    An enhanced understanding of the innovative use of artificial intelligence (AI) is essential for organizations to improve work design and daily business operations. This study's purpose is to offer insights into how AI can transform organizations' work practices through diving deeply into its innovative use in the context of a primary AI tool, a chatbot, and examining the antecedents of innovative use by conceptualizing employee trust as a multidimensional construct and exploring employees' perceived benefits. In particular, we have conceptualized employee trust in chatbots as a second-order construct, including three first-order variables: trust in functionality, trust in reliability, and trust in data protection. We collected data from 202 employees. The results supported our conceptualization of trust in chatbots and showed that three dimensions of first-order trust beliefs have relatively the same level of importance. Further, both knowledge support and work-life balance enhance trust in chatbots, which in turn leads to innovative use of chatbots. Our study contributes to the existing literature by introducing the new conceptualization of trust in chatbots and examining its antecedents and outcomes. The results can provide important practical insights regarding how to support innovative use of chatbots as the new way we organize work.
    Series
    Special issue: artificial intelligence and work
  9. Slota, S.C.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Lee, M.K.; Greenberg, S.R.; Nigam, I.; Zimmerman, T.; Rodriguez, S.; Snow, J.: ¬A feeling for the data : how government and nonprofit stakeholders negotiate value conflicts in data science approaches to ending homelessness (2023) 0.03 
    0.03117666 = product of:
  0.12470664 = sum of:
    0.09009978 = weight(_text_:supported in 969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009978 = score(doc=969,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3925991 = fieldWeight in 969, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=969)
    0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034606863 = score(doc=969,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 969, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=969)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Governmental and organizational policy increasingly claims to be data-driven, data-informed, or knowledge-driven. We explore the data practices of local governments and nonprofits a seeking to end homelessness in the City of Austin. Drawing on 31 interviews with stakeholders, alongside the reflections and experiences of our interdisciplinary, cross-sector collaborative team, we consider the role of data in guiding and informing interventions and policy regarding homelessness. Ending homelessness is a particularly challenging scenario for intervention, with increasing politicization, changing circumstances, and needing rapid intervention to reduce harm. In exploring some implications of data science "in the wild" as it is deployed, understood, and supported within the Travis County Continuum of Care (CoC), we analyze how data-intensive work connects and engages across disciplinary boundaries. Furthermore, we consider how data science and the iField can collaborate in addressing complex, social problems as advisors and partners with invested organizations.
  10. Thomas, S.E.: ¬The Program for Cooperative Cataloging : backstory and future potential (2020) 0.03 
    0.02655983 = product of:
  0.21247864 = sum of:
    0.21247864 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21247864 = score(doc=124,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.9209445 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In 1988 the Library of Congress and eight library participants undertook a two-year pilot known as the National Coordinated Cataloging Program (NCCP) to increase the number of quality bibliographic records. Subsequently the Bibliographic Services Study Committee reviewed the pilot. Discussions held at the Library of Congress (LC) and in other fora resulted in the creation of the Cooperative Cataloging Council, and, ultimately, the establishment of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) in 1994. The conditions that contributed to a successful approach to shared cataloging are described. The article concludes with considerations for expanding the future effectiveness of the PCC.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  11. Sa, N.; Yuan, X.J.: Examining users' partial query modification patterns in voice search (2020) 0.03 
    0.02598055 = product of:
  0.1039222 = sum of:
    0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07508315 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
    0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028839052 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    This article investigates how to improve the effectiveness of voice search systems. Earlier research found that participants employed voice search much less frequently than keyboard search. The main reasons that participants disliked voice search are system mistakes and the inability to modify queries. In keyboard search, query reformulation is facilitated by partial query modification, which is not supported by most of the current voice search systems. Consequently, users need to speak the complete query in voice search even with only minor changes. This article focuses on examining partial query modification during voice search through a Wizard of Oz user experiment. It examines if users would prefer partial query modification and how they perform it in voice search. Thirty-two participants participated in the experiment. Results indicated that when given the opportunity, the users performed more partial query modifications than complete queries. Common partial query modification strategies and patterns emerged from the experiment. The results can be used to improve the voice search system design and benefit the research community in general. System implications and future work were discussed.
  12. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.03 
    0.025129944 = product of:
  0.10051978 = sum of:
    0.08476915 = weight(_text_:work in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08476915 = score(doc=351,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.5959971 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.015750622 = product of:
      0.031501245 = sum of:
        0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031501245 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
  13. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.02 
    0.023001488 = product of:
  0.1840119 = sum of:
    0.1840119 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1840119 = score(doc=121,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.79756135 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  14. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.02 
    0.022052169 = product of:
  0.088208675 = sum of:
    0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07508315 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
    0.01312552 = product of:
      0.02625104 = sum of:
        0.02625104 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02625104 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  15. Meyer, O.C.: Retrievalexperimente mit bibliothekarischen Daten : Historischer Überblick und aktueller Forschungsstand (2022) 0.02 
    0.016971767 = product of:
  0.13577414 = sum of:
    0.13577414 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13577414 = score(doc=655,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.57313037 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Bachelorarbeit zur Erlangung des Bachelor-Grades Bachelor of Arts im Studiengang Bibliothekswissenschaft an der Fakultät für Informationswissenschaft der Technischen Hochschule Köln.
    Imprint
    Köln : Technische Hochschule / Fakultät für Informationswissenschaft
  16. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.02 
    0.01592754 = product of:
  0.12742032 = sum of:
    0.12742032 = weight(_text_:supported in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12742032 = score(doc=894,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.55521894 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
  17. Gorichanaz, T.: Sanctuary : an institutional vision for the digital age (2021) 0.02 
    0.015769057 = product of:
  0.06307623 = sum of:
    0.049950704 = weight(_text_:work in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049950704 = score(doc=107,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.35119468 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
    0.01312552 = product of:
      0.02625104 = sum of:
        0.02625104 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02625104 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Purpose Trends in information technology and contemplative practices compel us to consider the intersections of information and contemplation. The purpose of this paper is to consider these intersections at the level of institutions. Design/methodology/approach First, the notion of institution is defined and discussed, along with information institutions and contemplative institutions. Next, sanctuary is proposed and explored as a vision for institutions in the digital age. Findings Sanctuary is a primordial human institution that has especial urgency in the digital age. This paper develops an info-contemplative framework for sanctuaries, including the elements: stability, silence, refuge, privacy and reform. Research limitations/implications This is a conceptual paper that, though guided by prior empirical and theoretical work, would benefit from application, validation and critique. This paper is meant as a starting point for discussions of institutions for the digital age. Practical implications As much as this paper is meant to prompt further research, it also provides guidance and inspiration for professionals to infuse their work with aspects of sanctuary and be attentive to the tensions inherent in sanctuary. Originality/value This paper builds on discourse at the intersection of information studies and contemplative studies, also connecting this with recent work on information institutions.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:20:55
  18. Schulz, T.: Konzeption und prototypische Entwicklung eines Thesaurus für IT-Konzepte an Hochschulen (2021) 0.01 
    0.01414314 = product of:
  0.11314512 = sum of:
    0.11314512 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11314512 = score(doc=429,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.47760868 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit zur Erlangung des Grades Bachelor of Science Wirtschaftsinformatik des Fachbereichs Wirtschaft der Technischen Hochschule Brandenburg. Vgl. unter: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhbrb/files/2732/20210826_BT_SchulzTheresa.pdf.
    Imprint
    Brandenburg : Technischen Hochschule Brandenburg
  19. Schönbächler, E.; Strasser, T.; Himpsl-Gutermann, K.: Vom Chat zum Check : Informationskompetenz mit ChatGPT steigern (2023) 0.01 
    0.014000993 = product of:
  0.112007946 = sum of:
    0.112007946 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112007946 = score(doc=924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.47280845 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag greift den aktuellen Diskurs um die KI-Anwendung ChatGPT und deren Bedeutung in Schule und Hochschule auf. Dabei werden durch einen Überblick über verschiedene Assistenzsysteme, die auf Künstlicher Intelligenz beruhen, Grundlagen und Unterschiede herausgearbeitet. Der Bereich der Chatbots wird näher beleuchtet, die beiden grundlegenden Arten des regelbasierten Chatbots und des Machine Learning Bots werden anhand von anschaulichen Beispielen praxisnah erklärt. Schließlich wird herausgearbeitet, dass Informationskompetenz als Schlüsselkompetenz des 21. Jahrhunderts auch die wesentliche Grundlage dafür ist, im Bildungsbereich konstruktiv mit KI-Systemen wie ChatGPT umzugehen und die wesentlichen Funktionsmechanismen zu verstehen. Ein Unterrichtsentwurf zum Thema "Biene" schließt den Praxisbeitrag ab.
  20. Holden, C.: ¬The bibliographic work : history, theory, and practice (2021) 0.01 
    0.013352668 = product of:
  0.10682134 = sum of:
    0.10682134 = weight(_text_:work in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10682134 = score(doc=120,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.75104225 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The bibliographic work has assumed a great deal of importance in modern cataloging. But the concept of the work has existed for over a century, and even some of the earliest catalog codes differentiate between the intellectual work and its instances. This article will delve into the history and theory of the work, providing a basic overview of the concept as well as a summary of the myriad uses of the work throughout the history of cataloging. In addition to monographs, this paper will look at the work as applied to music, moving images, serials, and aggregates.

Authors

Languages

  • e 256
  • d 39
  • pt 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 278
  • el 36
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications