Search (199 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.13
    0.12855075 = product of:
      0.2571015 = sum of:
        0.06427538 = product of:
          0.19282612 = sum of:
            0.19282612 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19282612 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34309596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19282612 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19282612 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34309596 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.11
    0.10712563 = product of:
      0.21425126 = sum of:
        0.053562816 = product of:
          0.16068844 = sum of:
            0.16068844 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16068844 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34309596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16068844 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16068844 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34309596 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023) 0.04
    0.04259926 = product of:
      0.17039704 = sum of:
        0.17039704 = weight(_text_:register in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17039704 = score(doc=785,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.74715954 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
    Theme
    Register
  4. Adler, M.: ¬The strangeness of subject cataloging : afterword (2020) 0.03
    0.032088008 = product of:
      0.064176016 = sum of:
        0.056799013 = weight(_text_:register in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056799013 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.24905318 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
        0.0073770015 = product of:
          0.022131003 = sum of:
            0.022131003 = weight(_text_:29 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022131003 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    "I can't presume to know how other catalogers view the systems, information resources, and institutions with which they engage on a daily basis. David Paton gives us a glimpse in this issue of the affective experiences of bibliographers and catalogers of artists' books in South Africa, and it is clear that the emotional range among them is wide. What I can say is that catalogers' feelings and worldviews, whatever they may be, give the library its shape. I think we can agree that the librarians who constructed the Library of Congress Classification around 1900, Melvil Dewey, and the many classifiers around the world past and present, have had particular sets of desires around control and access and order. We all are asked to submit to those desires in our library work, as well as our own pursuit of knowledge and pleasure reading. And every decision regarding the aboutness of a book, or about where to place it within a particular discipline, takes place in a cataloger's affective and experiential world. While the classification provides the outlines, the catalogers color in the spaces with the books, based on their own readings of the book descriptions and their interpretations of the classification scheme. The decisions they make and the structures to which they are bound affect the circulation of books and their readers across the library. Indeed, some of the encounters will be unexpected, strange, frustrating, frightening, shame-inducing, awe-inspiring, and/or delightful. The emotional experiences of students described in Mabee and Fancher's article, as well as those of any visitor to the library, are all affected by classificatory design. One concern is that a library's ordering principles may reinforce or heighten already existing feelings of precarity or marginality. Because the classifications are hidden from patrons' view, it is difficult to measure the way the order affects a person's mind and body. That a person does not consciously register the associations does not mean that they are not affected."
    Date
    5. 6.2020 17:23:29
  5. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03
    0.031392034 = product of:
      0.06278407 = sum of:
        0.053562816 = product of:
          0.16068844 = sum of:
            0.16068844 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16068844 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34309596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009221252 = product of:
          0.027663754 = sum of:
            0.027663754 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027663754 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  6. Almeida, M.B.; Felipe, E.R.; Barcelos, R.: Toward a document-centered ontological theory for information architecture in corporations (2020) 0.02
    0.017749693 = product of:
      0.07099877 = sum of:
        0.07099877 = weight(_text_:register in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07099877 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.3113165 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The beginning of the 21st century attested to the first movements toward information architecture (IA), originating from the field of library and information science (LIS). IA is acknowledged as an important meta-discipline concerned with the design, implementation, and maintenance of digital information spaces. Despite the relevance of IA, there is little research about the subject within LIS, and still less if one considers initiatives for creating a theory for IA. In this article, we provide a theory for IA and describe the resources needed to create it through ontological models. We also choose the "document" as the key entity for such theory, contemplating kinds of documents that not only serve to register information, but also create claims and obligations in society. To achieve our goals, we provide a background for subtheories from LIS and from Applied Ontology. As a result, we present some basic theory for IA in the form of a formal framework to represent corporations in which IA activities take place, acknowledging that our approach is de facto a subset of IA we call the enterprise information architecture (EAI) approach. By doing this, we highlight the effects that documents cause within corporations in the scope of EIA.
  7. Shanahan, M.: ¬ Die technologische Singularität (2021) 0.02
    0.017749693 = product of:
      0.07099877 = sum of:
        0.07099877 = weight(_text_:register in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07099877 = score(doc=196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.3113165 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Zusammenfassung: Intro -- Titel -- Inhaltsverzeichnis -- Vorwort -- Einleitung -- 1. Wege zur künstlichen Intelligenz -- 2. Gehirnemulation -- 3. Die technische Realisation künstlicher Intelligenz -- 4. Superintelligenz -- 5. KI und Bewusstsein -- 6. KI und ihre Folgen -- 7. Himmel oder Hölle -- Glossar -- Anmerkungen -- Literatur -- Register -- Impressum.
  8. Bredemeier, W.: "Strategische Deökonomisierung und Demokratisierung der Informationszugänge" : Eine Alternative zu Google und den Sozialen Medien? (2022) 0.02
    0.017749693 = product of:
      0.07099877 = sum of:
        0.07099877 = weight(_text_:register in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07099877 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.3113165 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Morozov hat zudem eine Alternative zu Google geschaffen. Zumindest wird sein Dienst so in Teilen der Öffentlichkeit und im persönlichen Umfeld von Morozov wahrgenommen. Das Angebot trägt den Namen "The Syllabus" (auf Deutsch: "Das Register" oder "Das Verzeichnis"). www.the-syllabus.com. Das ist nach Sara Getz als Frontstellung gegen die "Attention Economy" zu verstehen, in der die Anbieter um die knappe Aufmerksamkeit ihrer Nutzer ringen. Wie erfolgreich sie dabei sind, wird nach Auflagenhöhen, Einschaltquoten, Klicks und "Likes" gemessen. Diese stellen einen Anreiz dar, kürzer, schriller, boulevardesker und oberflächlicher zu schreiben. Im Folgenden werden Beschreibungen und Bewertungen von "The Syllabus" seitens Sara Getz und Niklas Meek wiedergegeben. Hinzu kommen die Selbstbeschreibungen von Syllabus auf der eigenen Webseite und meine persönliche Bilanz, nachdem ich "The Syllabus" ein knappes Jahr genutzt habe.
  9. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01
    0.011015731 = product of:
      0.044062924 = sum of:
        0.044062924 = product of:
          0.06609438 = sum of:
            0.033196505 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033196505 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.03289788 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03289788 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  10. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01
    0.011015731 = product of:
      0.044062924 = sum of:
        0.044062924 = product of:
          0.06609438 = sum of:
            0.033196505 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033196505 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.03289788 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03289788 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  11. Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.01
    0.010649815 = product of:
      0.04259926 = sum of:
        0.04259926 = weight(_text_:register in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04259926 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22805978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04046892 = queryNorm
            0.18678989 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6354303 = idf(docFreq=428, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Grußwort Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft / Vorwort der Herausgeber / Rainer Kuhlen & Wolfgang Semar: A 1 Information - ein Konstrukt mit Folgen - 3 / Marlies Ockenfeld: A 2 Institutionalisierung der Informationswissenschaft und der IuD-Infrastruktur in Deutschland - 27 / Hans-Christoph Hobohm: A 3 Theorien in der Informationswissenschaft - 45 / Julia Maria Struß & Dirk Lewandowski: A 4 Methoden in der Informationswissenschaft - 57 / Ursula Georgy, Frauke Schade & Stefan Schmunk A 5 Ausbildung, Studium und Weiterbildung in der Informationswissenschaft - 71 / Robert Strötgen & René Schneider: A 6 Bibliotheken - 83 / Karin Schwarz: A 7 Archive - 93 / Hartwig Lüdtke: A 8 Museen - 103 / Barbara Müller-Heiden: A 9 Mediatheken - 111 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: A 10 Information Professionals - 117 / Axel Ermert: A 11 Normen und Standardisierung im Informationsbereich - 123 / Thomas Bähr: A 12 Langzeitarchivierung - 135 / Ulrich Reimer: B 1 Einführung in die Wissensorganisation - 147 / Gerd Knorz: B 2 Intellektuelles Indexieren - 159 / Klaus Lepsky: B 3 Automatisches Indexieren - 171 / Andreas Oskar Kempf: B 4 Thesauri - 183 / Michael Kleineberg: B 5 Klassifikation - 195 / Heidrun Wiesenmüller: B 6 Formale Erschließung - 207 / Jochen Fassbender: B 7 Register/Indexe - 219 / Udo Hahn: B 8 Abstracting - Textzusammenfassung - 233 / Rolf Assfalg: B 9 Metadaten - 245 / Heiko Rölke & Albert Weichselbraun: B 10 Ontologien und Linked Open Data - 257 / Isabelle Dorsch & Stefanie Haustein: B 11 Bibliometrie - 271 / Udo Hahn: B 12 Automatische Sprachverarbeitung - 281 /
  12. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.009179777 = product of:
      0.036719106 = sum of:
        0.036719106 = product of:
          0.055078655 = sum of:
            0.027663754 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027663754 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.0274149 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0274149 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.009179777 = product of:
      0.036719106 = sum of:
        0.036719106 = product of:
          0.055078655 = sum of:
            0.027663754 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027663754 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.0274149 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0274149 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  14. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01
    0.007985838 = product of:
      0.03194335 = sum of:
        0.03194335 = product of:
          0.09583005 = sum of:
            0.09583005 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09583005 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  15. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01
    0.0063968096 = product of:
      0.025587238 = sum of:
        0.025587238 = product of:
          0.076761715 = sum of:
            0.076761715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076761715 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  16. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.01
    0.005532751 = product of:
      0.022131003 = sum of:
        0.022131003 = product of:
          0.06639301 = sum of:
            0.06639301 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06639301 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  17. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.01
    0.005532751 = product of:
      0.022131003 = sum of:
        0.022131003 = product of:
          0.06639301 = sum of:
            0.06639301 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06639301 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  18. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.01
    0.005532751 = product of:
      0.022131003 = sum of:
        0.022131003 = product of:
          0.06639301 = sum of:
            0.06639301 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06639301 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  19. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.01
    0.005532751 = product of:
      0.022131003 = sum of:
        0.022131003 = product of:
          0.06639301 = sum of:
            0.06639301 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06639301 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.142357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  20. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.01
    0.00548298 = product of:
      0.02193192 = sum of:
        0.02193192 = product of:
          0.06579576 = sum of:
            0.06579576 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06579576 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14171526 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04046892 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 72

Types

  • a 177
  • el 41
  • m 9
  • p 4
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…