Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992) 0.02 
    0.01724935 = product of:
  0.12074544 = sum of:
    0.10979186 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10979186 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024548283 = queryNorm
        0.8891745 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
    0.010953585 = product of:
      0.04381434 = sum of:
        0.04381434 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04381434 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  2. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.005495343 = product of:
  0.0384674 = sum of:
    0.034309957 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034309957 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024548283 = queryNorm
        0.27786705 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.004157442 = product of:
      0.016629769 = sum of:
        0.016629769 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016629769 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  3. Korwitz, U.: Welchen 'Rang' hat ein Wissenschaftler? (1995) 0.00 
    0.003921138 = product of:
  0.05489593 = sum of:
    0.05489593 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05489593 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024548283 = queryNorm
        0.44458726 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Für die Einschätzung der Relevanz der Arbeit von Wissenschaftlern wird in zunehmendem Maße deren Publikationsverhalten als Bewertungskriterium eingesetzt. Hierbei sind vor allem die Zahl der Publikationen sowie die wissenschaftliche Reputation des jeweiligen zeitschriftentitels von zentraler Bedeutung. Die vorliegenden Ausführungen geben einen kurzen Einblick in die Probleme bei der Beurteilung wissenschaftlicher Tätigkeit mit Hilfe der Zitationsanalyse
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0034653428 = product of:
  0.0485148 = sum of:
    0.0485148 = product of:
      0.0970296 = sum of:
        0.04381434 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04381434 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.053215254 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053215254 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Pipp, E.: Inhaltlicher Vergleich von Web of Science und Scopus an Hand der erfassten Zeitschriften (2006) 0.00 
    0.0034309956 = product of:
  0.048033938 = sum of:
    0.048033938 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 5940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048033938 = score(doc=5940,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024548283 = queryNorm
        0.38901386 = fieldWeight in 5940, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5940)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Bibliographische Datenbanken sind immer noch von Bedeutung, obwohl diee-Zeitschriften-Plattformen der Verlage (z.B. ScienceDirect) und die Institutional Repositories (Publikationsdatenbanken einzelner wissenschaftlicher Institutionen) auch Suchmöglichkeiten anbieten. Nur in bibliographischen Datenbanken kann verlags- und institutionsübergreifend nach Fachliteratur zu einem Thema bzw. nach wissenschaftlichen Publikationen eines Autors / einer Autorin gesucht werden. Ein wichtiger Ansatzpunktzur Bewertung des Inhaltes einer bibliographischen Datenbank - und erst recht für einen inhaltlichen Vergleich zwischen zwei Konkurrenzdatenbanken - ist daher eine Analyse der darin enthaltenen Zeitschriften hinsichtlich der Anzahl der erfassten Zeitschriften, aber auch hinsichtlich der Wissenschaftlichkeit, der fachlichen Ausrichtung, der Vollständigkeit und der Aktualität derselben. Im Folgenden soll ein solcher Vergleich für das Web of Science und für Scopus versucht werden.
  6. Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999) 0.00 
    0.0029408536 = product of:
  0.04117195 = sum of:
    0.04117195 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04117195 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024548283 = queryNorm
        0.33344045 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Das ISI in Philadelphia bündelt seine großen Zitationsdatenbanken und bietet sie (vorzugsweise als Intranet-, aber auch als Internetlösung) als 'Web of Science'an. Im derzeitigen entwicklungsstand geht 'Web of Science' bis in die 70er Jahre zurück und weist damit knapp 20 Mill. Quellenartikel mit darin enthaltenen rund 300 Mill. Zitationen in einer einzigen datenbank nach. Neben 'gewohnten' Suchstrategien etwa nach Sachthemen oder Namen werden zitationsanalytische Suchstrategien geboten: Recherchen nach zitierter Literatur, nach zitierenden Artikeln und nach (im Sinne gemeinsamer Fußnoten) 'verwandten' Artikeln. Die Ausgabefunktionen umfassen Document Delivery via ISI sowie Links zu Artikeln, die parallel zur Druckausgabe im WWW erscheinen. Durch die Multidisziplinarität der ISI-Datenbanken sind als Kundenkreis vor allem Einrichtungen angesprochen, die mehrere Wissenschaftsfächer berühren. Hochschulbibliotheken oder Bibliotheken großer Forschungseinrichtungen dürften am 'Web of Science' kaum vorbeikommen. Parallele Produkte bei Online-Archiven, auf CD-ROM oder als Druckausgabe verlieren an Bedeutung
  7. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00 
    0.0012995036 = product of:
  0.01819305 = sum of:
    0.01819305 = product of:
      0.0363861 = sum of:
        0.016430378 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016430378 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.01995572 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01995572 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  8. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0012995036 = product of:
  0.01819305 = sum of:
    0.01819305 = product of:
      0.0363861 = sum of:
        0.016430378 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016430378 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
        0.01995572 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01995572 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  9. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.00 
    9.502724E-4 = product of:
  0.0133038135 = sum of:
    0.0133038135 = product of:
      0.053215254 = sum of:
        0.053215254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053215254 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    8.3993014E-4 = product of:
  0.011759021 = sum of:
    0.011759021 = product of:
      0.047036085 = sum of:
        0.047036085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047036085 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  11. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.00 
    6.775774E-4 = product of:
  0.009486083 = sum of:
    0.009486083 = product of:
      0.03794433 = sum of:
        0.03794433 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03794433 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  12. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    5.9392035E-4 = product of:
  0.008314884 = sum of:
    0.008314884 = product of:
      0.033259537 = sum of:
        0.033259537 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033259537 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  13. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    5.039581E-4 = product of:
  0.007055413 = sum of:
    0.007055413 = product of:
      0.028221652 = sum of:
        0.028221652 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028221652 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  14. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.00 
    4.889993E-4 = product of:
  0.00684599 = sum of:
    0.00684599 = product of:
      0.02738396 = sum of:
        0.02738396 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02738396 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
  15. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.00 
    4.889993E-4 = product of:
  0.00684599 = sum of:
    0.00684599 = product of:
      0.02738396 = sum of:
        0.02738396 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02738396 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Footnote
    Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
  16. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.00 
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
  0.0066519068 = sum of:
    0.0066519068 = product of:
      0.026607627 = sum of:
        0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026607627 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  17. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.00 
    4.2348588E-4 = product of:
  0.005928802 = sum of:
    0.005928802 = product of:
      0.023715207 = sum of:
        0.023715207 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023715207 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  18. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00 
    4.157442E-4 = product of:
  0.0058204187 = sum of:
    0.0058204187 = product of:
      0.023281675 = sum of:
        0.023281675 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023281675 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  19. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00 
    4.157442E-4 = product of:
  0.0058204187 = sum of:
    0.0058204187 = product of:
      0.023281675 = sum of:
        0.023281675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023281675 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  20. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.00 
    4.157442E-4 = product of:
  0.0058204187 = sum of:
    0.0058204187 = product of:
      0.023281675 = sum of:
        0.023281675 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023281675 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 14

Types

  • a 48
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications