Search (3265 results, page 1 of 164)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.29
    0.2906904 = product of:
      0.43603557 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0153788235 = product of:
          0.030757647 = sum of:
            0.030757647 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030757647 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.29
    0.2850034 = product of:
      0.5700068 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25495648 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25495648 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.25495648 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25495648 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.29
    0.2850034 = product of:
      0.5700068 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25495648 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25495648 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.25495648 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25495648 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.28
    0.28043783 = product of:
      0.56087565 = sum of:
        0.08012509 = product of:
          0.24037528 = sum of:
            0.24037528 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24037528 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.28
    0.28043783 = product of:
      0.56087565 = sum of:
        0.08012509 = product of:
          0.24037528 = sum of:
            0.24037528 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24037528 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.26
    0.25509745 = product of:
      0.38264614 = sum of:
        0.050078183 = product of:
          0.15023455 = sum of:
            0.15023455 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15023455 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15023455 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15023455 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.15023455 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15023455 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.032098845 = product of:
          0.06419769 = sum of:
            0.06419769 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06419769 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20968898 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.30615672 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  7. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.25
    0.2453831 = product of:
      0.4907662 = sum of:
        0.07010946 = product of:
          0.21032837 = sum of:
            0.21032837 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21032837 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21032837 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21032837 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.21032837 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21032837 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  8. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.21
    0.21032837 = product of:
      0.42065674 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  9. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.21
    0.21032837 = product of:
      0.42065674 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  10. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.21
    0.21032837 = product of:
      0.42065674 = sum of:
        0.06009382 = product of:
          0.18028146 = sum of:
            0.18028146 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18028146 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.18028146 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028146 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  11. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.20
    0.1982995 = product of:
      0.59489846 = sum of:
        0.29744923 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29744923 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.29744923 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29744923 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.18
    0.17527364 = product of:
      0.35054728 = sum of:
        0.050078183 = product of:
          0.15023455 = sum of:
            0.15023455 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15023455 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15023455 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15023455 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.15023455 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15023455 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.16
    0.16025019 = product of:
      0.48075056 = sum of:
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.24037528 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24037528 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3207752 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  14. gch: Wortgedächtnis hat im Alter Aussetzer (2012) 0.08
    0.07877517 = product of:
      0.2363255 = sum of:
        0.2158204 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2158204 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.7100523 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
        0.020505099 = product of:
          0.041010197 = sum of:
            0.041010197 = weight(_text_:22 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041010197 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03783614 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Wenn wir älter werden, fällt es uns immer schwerer, die richtigen Wörter parat zu haben, obwohl. unser Wortschatz im Laufe des Lebens eigentlich wächst. Das Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften und die Universität Leipzig haben jetzt den Grund herausgefunden: Die zuständigen Netzwerke im Gehirn kommunizieren im Lauf der Zeit anders, Das macht sie ineffizienter. Die Experimente zeigten, dass Jüngere aktivere Sprachareale haben und dass das semantische Gedächtnis sich besser mit dem exekutiven Areal austauscht, Im semantschen Gedächtnis ist das Faktenwissen abgespeichert; das exekutive Netzwerk steuert Aufmerksamkeit und Gedächtnis."
    Date
    12. 9.2021 18:22:39
  15. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Aufgabenteilung zwischen Wortschatz und Grammatik in einer Indexsprache (1979) 0.07
    0.07194014 = product of:
      0.4316408 = sum of:
        0.4316408 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4316408 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            1.4201046 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  16. dpa: Die, und, in, zu, den ... : ... sind die gebräuchlichsten Wörter / Wortschatz liegt brach (1999) 0.07
    0.07194014 = product of:
      0.4316408 = sum of:
        0.4316408 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4316408 = score(doc=16,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            1.4201046 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Seelbach, H.E.: Von der Stichwortliste zum halbautomatisch kontrollierten Wortschatz (1977) 0.06
    0.063586704 = product of:
      0.3815202 = sum of:
        0.3815202 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 8950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3815202 = score(doc=8950,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            1.2552071 = fieldWeight in 8950, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8950)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bei Volltextsuch-Systemen kann jede Zeichenfolge aus dem Text als potentieller Suchbegriff übernommen werden. Dies führt bei großen Dokumentbeständen trotz Stoppwörtern zu umfangreichen und nicht mehr überschaubaren Wortlisten. Es wird ein Verfahren, bestehend aus Programmen und rationallem, intellektuellem Einsatz der Dokumentare vorgestellt, das solche Stichwortlisten in einen kontrollierten Wortschatz mit Vorzugsbenennungen, zusammengesetzten Ausdrücken und Thesaurusrelationen halbautomatisch überführt
  18. Filipec, J.: Zur Spezifik des spezialsprachlichen Wortschatzes gegenüber dem allgemeinen Wortschatz (1993) 0.06
    0.062947616 = product of:
      0.3776857 = sum of:
        0.3776857 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3776857 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            1.2425915 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  19. Rahmstorf, G.: Bedeutungsdefinition und Wortumfeld (1993) 0.05
    0.053955104 = product of:
      0.32373062 = sum of:
        0.32373062 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32373062 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            1.0650785 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Wortschatz, Satz, Text. Beiträge der Konferenzen in Greifswald und Neubrandenburg 1992. Hrsg.: G. Bartels u. I. Pohl
  20. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Funktion von semantischen Kategorien in Indexierungssprachen und bei der Indexierung (1986) 0.05
    0.04672649 = product of:
      0.28035894 = sum of:
        0.28035894 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28035894 = score(doc=1554,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03783614 = queryNorm
            0.92238504 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Wenn man unter "Indexierung" den zweistufigen Prozeß (a) des Erkennens der Essenz eines wiederauffindbar zu machenden Textes und (b) des Wiedergebens dieser Essenz in einer ausreichend wiedergabetreuen und genügend gut voraussagbaren Form versteht, dann kann die Qualität der Indexierung gesteigert werden, wenn sie unter besonderer Beachtung der Begriffe aus einer kleinen Zahl von besonders wichtigen semantischen Kategorien erfolgt. Bei der Gestaltung der Indexierungssprache müssen die Begriffe aus diesen Kategorien in der erforderlichen Detailliertheit in den Wortschatz aufgenommen werden, und Präkombinationen, die zu "multikategorialen" Begroffen führen, sind möglichst weitgehend zu vermeiden. Präkombinationen, die ausschließlich durch Einbeziehung von häufig vorkommenden ("ubiquitätren") monokategorialen Begriffen gebildet werden, können und sollen aus pragmatischen Gründen für den Wortschatz zugelassen werden. Das Konzept des "Relationenweges" erklärt, inwiefern solche Präkombinationen für den Wortschatz nicht schädlich sind

Languages

Types

  • el 78
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes