Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0057829856 = product of:
  0.028914927 = sum of:
    0.028914927 = product of:
      0.057829853 = sum of:
        0.057829853 = weight(_text_:kommentar in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057829853 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28622067 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039128654 = queryNorm
            0.2020464 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Kommentar M. Buzinkay: "Bibliotheken werden um Social Tagging nicht herum kommen, da schlichtweg die Kapazitäten für eine inhaltliche Erschließung fehlen. Stattdessen wäre es von Notwendigkeit, Normdateien zum Bestandteil des Tagging zu machen. Verfehlt wäre es, auf die bibliothekarische Erschließung zu verzichten, weil das zu Lasten des Verhältnisses von Recall und Precision gehen würde." (In: http://www.buzinkay.net/blog-de/2009/05/buchrezension-good-tags-bad-tags/)

0.0018554874 = product of:
  0.009277437 = sum of:
    0.009277437 = product of:
      0.018554874 = sum of:
        0.018554874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018554874 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13702188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039128654 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)