-
Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017)
0.00
0.0028917524 = product of:
0.02313402 = sum of:
0.007580368 = product of:
0.022741104 = sum of:
0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022741104 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015553651 = weight(_text_:internet in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015553651 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07947389 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Patents sometimes cite webpages either as general background to the problem being addressed or to identify prior publications that limit the scope of the patent granted. Counts of the number of patents citing an organization's website may therefore provide an indicator of its technological capacity or relevance. This article introduces methods to extract URL citations from patents and evaluates the usefulness of counts of patent web citations as a technology indicator. An analysis of patents citing 200 US universities or 177 UK universities found computer science and engineering departments to be frequently cited, as well as research-related webpages, such as Wikipedia, YouTube, or the Internet Archive. Overall, however, patent URL citations seem to be frequent enough to be useful for ranking major US and the top few UK universities if popular hosted subdomains are filtered out, but the hit count estimates on the first search engine results page should not be relied upon for accuracy.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Can the impact of scholarly images be assessed online? : an exploratory study using image identification technology (2010)
0.00
0.002409794 = product of:
0.019278351 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012961377 = weight(_text_:internet in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961377 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07947389 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The web contains a huge number of digital pictures. For scholars publishing such images it is important to know how well used their images are, but no method seems to have been developed for monitoring the value of academic images. In particular, can the impact of scientific or artistic images be assessed through identifying images copied or reused on the Internet? This article explores a case study of 260 NASA images to investigate whether the TinEye search engine could theoretically help to provide this information. The results show that the selected pictures had a median of 11 online copies each. However, a classification of 210 of these copies reveals that only 1.4% were explicitly used in academic publications, reflecting research impact, and the majority of the NASA pictures were used for informal scholarly (or educational) communication (37%). Additional analyses of world famous paintings and scientific images about pathology and molecular structures suggest that image contents are important for the type and extent of image use. Although it is reasonable to use statistics derived from TinEye for assessing image reuse value, the extent of its image indexing is not known.
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Academia.edu : Social network or Academic Network? (2014)
0.00
0.002409794 = product of:
0.019278351 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 1234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=1234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1234)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012961377 = weight(_text_:internet in 1234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961377 = score(doc=1234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07947389 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 1234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1234)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Theme
- Internet
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015)
0.00
0.0018676403 = product of:
0.014941122 = sum of:
0.007580368 = product of:
0.022741104 = sum of:
0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022741104 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007360754 = product of:
0.022082262 = sum of:
0.022082262 = weight(_text_:29 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022082262 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:29:49
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks (2014)
0.00
0.0015563669 = product of:
0.012450935 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.006133962 = product of:
0.018401885 = sum of:
0.018401885 = weight(_text_:29 in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018401885 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Some curricula vitae (web CVs) of academics on the web, including homepages and publication lists, link to open-access (OA) articles, resources, abstracts in publishers' websites, or academic discussions, helping to disseminate research. To assess how common such practices are and whether they vary by discipline, gender, and country, the authors conducted a large-scale e-mail survey of astronomy and astrophysics, public health, environmental engineering, and philosophy across 15 European countries and analyzed hyperlinks from web CVs of academics. About 60% of the 2,154 survey responses reported having a web CV or something similar, and there were differences between disciplines, genders, and countries. A follow-up outlink analysis of 2,700 web CVs found that a third had at least one outlink to an OA target, typically a public eprint archive or an individual self-archived file. This proportion was considerably higher in astronomy (48%) and philosophy (37%) than in environmental engineering (29%) and public health (21%). There were also differences in linking to publishers' websites, resources, and discussions. Perhaps most important, however, the amount of linking to OA publications seems to be much lower than allowed by publishers and journals, suggesting that many opportunities for disseminating full-text research online are being missed, especially in disciplines without established repositories. Moreover, few academics seem to be exploiting their CVs to link to discussions, resources, or article abstracts, which seems to be another missed opportunity for publicizing research.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017)
0.00
0.0015563669 = product of:
0.012450935 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.006133962 = product of:
0.018401885 = sum of:
0.018401885 = weight(_text_:29 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018401885 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:29:45
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.00
0.0015494695 = product of:
0.012395756 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.006078783 = product of:
0.018236348 = sum of:
0.018236348 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018236348 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.00
0.0015494695 = product of:
0.012395756 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.006078783 = product of:
0.018236348 = sum of:
0.018236348 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018236348 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.00
0.0015494695 = product of:
0.012395756 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.006078783 = product of:
0.018236348 = sum of:
0.018236348 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018236348 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2016)
0.00
4.73773E-4 = product of:
0.007580368 = sum of:
0.007580368 = product of:
0.022741104 = sum of:
0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022741104 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? : an analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals (2008)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=1614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching : an automatic analysis of online syllabuses (2008)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017)
0.00
3.948108E-4 = product of:
0.006316973 = sum of:
0.006316973 = product of:
0.018950919 = sum of:
0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018950919 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026919862 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
