Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Scheele, M.: ¬Die universelle Facetten-Classifikation (UFC) und ihre mögliche Bedeutung für Allgemeinbildung, Terminologieforschung und Informationswesen (1978) 0.02
    0.016869826 = product of:
      0.13495861 = sum of:
        0.03561761 = weight(_text_:der in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03561761 = score(doc=66,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.59231687 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
        0.099341005 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099341005 = score(doc=66,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.119426325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.83181834 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : Gesellschaft für Klassifikation
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation II. Proc. der Sekt.4-6 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Höchst, 6.-7.4.1978
  2. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.01
    0.009410265 = product of:
      0.05018808 = sum of:
        0.01484067 = weight(_text_:der in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01484067 = score(doc=3739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
        0.029268626 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029268626 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.119426325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.24507684 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
        0.006078783 = product of:
          0.018236348 = sum of:
            0.018236348 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018236348 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004) 0.01
    0.007335148 = product of:
      0.058681183 = sum of:
        0.023558835 = weight(_text_:der in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023558835 = score(doc=3155,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.3917808 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.03512235 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03512235 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.119426325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.29409218 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Ein jeder Mensch ist mit seinem Dasein eingebettet in kosmische Gesetzmäßigkeiten und findet sich individualisiert und begrenzt durch die Bedingungen von Raum und Zeit; seine jeweilige "Mitgift" in vorgefundener Umgebung verlangt nach menschlicher Sinn Erfüllung. Diese ontischen Gegebenheiten können als Strukturvorgabe angesehen werden, die sich durch die kategorialen und logischen Strukturen menschlichen Denkens und Sprechens - z.B. in artikulierten Sätzen menschlichen Wissens - ergänzen lässt. Dabei bilden sich Wissensmuster, die sich in einem ontologisch fundierten Gesamtschema aller Wissensgebiete zur Darstellung bringen lassen können. Der Vortrag erläutert die hier angedeuteten kategorialen und systemtheoretischen Grundlagen mit Bezug auf die Konstruktion eines neuen, universalen Ordnungssystems aller Wissensgebiete, das vor 30 Jahren konzipiert wurde und sich bereits in vielfacher Hinsicht bewährt hat. Seine Rasterdarstellung ermöglicht eine übersichtliche, fokussierbare und unkomplizierte Handhabung in elektronischen Medien.
    Footnote
    Mit einer Übersicht der Information Coding Classification
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.8
    Source
    Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensmuster und Musterwissen im Erfassen klassifikatorischer Ganzheiten (1980) 0.01
    0.006282063 = product of:
      0.050256506 = sum of:
        0.020987878 = weight(_text_:der in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020987878 = score(doc=124,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.029268626 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029268626 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.119426325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.24507684 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Als 'klassifikatorische Ganzheiten' gelten hier Wissensgebiete, bzw. ihre Begriffe. Die Muster, die sich aufgrund der Begriffsrelationen von Wissensgebieten gewinnen lassen, werden sowohl durch formkategoriale als auch durch seinskategoriale Bezüge dieser Begriffe geprägt. Logische und linguistische Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, daß sich Wissensbereiche und Wissensgebiete formkategorial jeweils zu Triaden zusammenordnen lassen und als solche entsprechende Wissensmuster bilden. Ein universales System von 3**3 Triaden von Wissensgebieten wird vorgestellt und erläutert. Es wird dabei gezeigt, wie sich auch in der Interaktion von Wissensgebieten miteinander, z.B. in der Verwendung der Methoden und Verfahren eines Gebietes in einem anderen Gebiet oder der Fundierung eines Gebiets durch ein anderes gewisse Muster abzeichnen, die die Systemstellen eines solchen Systems apriori und auch aposteriori "systematisch" besetzen, ohne die innere Ordnung des Systems und seiner Triaden zu beeinträchtigen. Auf diese Weisen wird durch den Aspekt des internalen Bezugs von Wissensmustern (gegenüber dem o.g. elementalen und totalen) ein Musterwissen gewonnen, das insbesondere auch bei der Benutzung eines solchen Systems von großem Nutzen sein kann, da es das Gedächtnis stützt, die Mustererkennung ermöglicht und dementsprechend die Handhabung bei Einspeicherung und Retrieval von zu ordenbarem Wissen erleichtert.
    Source
    Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
  5. Beghtol, C.: From the universe of knowledge to the universe of concepts : the structural revolution in classification for information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.0058747744 = product of:
      0.09399639 = sum of:
        0.09399639 = weight(_text_:revolution in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09399639 = score(doc=1856,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16262007 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.5780122 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    During the twentieth century, bibliographic classification theory underwent a structural revolution. The first modern bibliographic classifications were top-down systems that started at the universe of knowledge and subdivided that universe downward to minute subclasses. After the invention of faceted classification by S.R. Ranganathan, the ideal was to build bottom-up classifications that started with the universe of concepts and built upward to larger and larger faceted classes. This ideal has not been achieved, and the two kinds of classification systems are not mutually exclusive. This paper examines the process by which this structural revolution was accomplished by looking at the spread of facet theory after 1924 when Ranganathan attended the School of Librarianship, London, through selected classification textbooks that were published after that date. To this end, the paper examines the role of W.C.B. Sayers as a teacher and author of three editions of The Manual of Classification for Librarians and Bibliographers. Sayers influenced both Ranganathan and the various members of the Classification Research Group (CRG) who were his students. Further, the paper contrasts the methods of evaluating classification systems that arose between Sayers's Canons of Classification in 1915- 1916 and J. Mills's A Modern Outline of Library Classification in 1960 in order to demonstrate the speed with which one kind of classificatory structure was overtaken by another.
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.00
    0.0041949265 = product of:
      0.03355941 = sum of:
        0.023745073 = weight(_text_:der in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023745073 = score(doc=4057,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
        0.009814339 = product of:
          0.029443016 = sum of:
            0.029443016 = weight(_text_:29 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029443016 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 18:29:20
  7. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    0.0040701623 = product of:
      0.0651226 = sum of:
        0.0651226 = weight(_text_:revolution in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0651226 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16262007 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.40045857 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
  8. Khanna, J.K.: Analytico-synthetic classification : (a study in CC-7) (1994) 0.00
    0.0027134418 = product of:
      0.04341507 = sum of:
        0.04341507 = weight(_text_:revolution in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04341507 = score(doc=1471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16262007 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.2669724 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    ANALYTICO-SYNTHETIC CLASSIFICATION- the brain-child of S.R. Ranganathan has brought about an intellectual revolution in the theory and methodology of library classification by generating new ideas. By his vast erudition and deeper research in the Universe of Subjects, Ranganathan applied a postulation approach to classification based on the concept of facet analysis, Phase Analysis, Sector Analysis and Zone Analysis. His enquiry into the concept of fundamental Categories as well as the Analytico-Synthetic quality associated with it, the use of different connecting symbols as in the Meccano apparatus for constructing expressive class numbers for subjects of any depth, the versality of Notation, the analysis of Rounds and Levels, the formation and sharpening of Isolates through various devices, the introduction of the novel concepts of Specals, Systems, Speciators, and Environment Constituents has systematized the whole study of classification into principles, rules and canons. These new methodologies in classification invented as a part of Colon Classification have not only lifted practical classification form mere guess work to scientific methodology but also form an important theme in international conferences. The present work discusses in details the unique methodologies of Ranganathan as used in CC-7. The concepts of Primary Basic Subjects and Non -Primary Basic Subjects have also been discussed at length.
  9. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.0023623458 = product of:
      0.018898766 = sum of:
        0.010388469 = weight(_text_:der in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010388469 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
        0.008510296 = product of:
          0.025530888 = sum of:
            0.025530888 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025530888 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  10. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.00
    0.0019442064 = product of:
      0.031107303 = sum of:
        0.031107303 = weight(_text_:internet in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031107303 = score(doc=5406,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07947389 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
    Theme
    Internet
  11. Stamm, E.: Mehrdimensionale Literaturerschließung : ein kritischer Vergelich der Sachkatalogisierungs-prinzipien S.R. Ranganathans, der englischen CRG und M. Taubes (1961) 0.00
    0.0018364392 = product of:
      0.029383028 = sum of:
        0.029383028 = weight(_text_:der in 8952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029383028 = score(doc=8952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 8952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8952)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  12. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.00
    0.0016942872 = product of:
      0.013554297 = sum of:
        0.007420335 = weight(_text_:der in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007420335 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
        0.006133962 = product of:
          0.018401885 = sum of:
            0.018401885 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018401885 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:58:02
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  13. Aschero, B.; Negrini, G.; Zanola, R.; Zozi, P.: Systematifier : a guide for the systematization of Italian literature (1995) 0.00
    0.0016065497 = product of:
      0.025704795 = sum of:
        0.025704795 = weight(_text_:der in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025704795 = score(doc=4128,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.3
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
  14. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.00
    0.0013737308 = product of:
      0.010989847 = sum of:
        0.005053579 = product of:
          0.015160736 = sum of:
            0.015160736 = weight(_text_:k in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015160736 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0059362683 = weight(_text_:der in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059362683 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  15. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.00
    0.0011054704 = product of:
      0.017687526 = sum of:
        0.017687526 = product of:
          0.053062577 = sum of:
            0.053062577 = weight(_text_:k in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053062577 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  16. LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    9.47546E-4 = product of:
      0.015160736 = sum of:
        0.015160736 = product of:
          0.045482207 = sum of:
            0.045482207 = weight(_text_:k in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045482207 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  17. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.00
    9.2009426E-4 = product of:
      0.014721508 = sum of:
        0.014721508 = product of:
          0.044164523 = sum of:
            0.044164523 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044164523 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Pages
    S.29-41
  18. Integrative level classification: Research project (2004-) 0.00
    9.182196E-4 = product of:
      0.014691514 = sum of:
        0.014691514 = weight(_text_:der in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014691514 = score(doc=1151,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Mit einer Abbildung der Klassen der ILC als Liniendiagramm (von U. Priss)
  19. Loehrlein, A.; Jacob, E.K.; Lee, S.; Yang, K.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification (2006) 0.00
    7.816855E-4 = product of:
      0.012506968 = sum of:
        0.012506968 = product of:
          0.037520904 = sum of:
            0.037520904 = weight(_text_:k in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037520904 = score(doc=247,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    7.5984787E-4 = product of:
      0.012157566 = sum of:
        0.012157566 = product of:
          0.036472697 = sum of:
            0.036472697 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036472697 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)