Search (197 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.10
    0.095366165 = product of:
      0.2384154 = sum of:
        0.05960385 = product of:
          0.17881155 = sum of:
            0.17881155 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17881155 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31815982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17881155 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17881155 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31815982 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037527647 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.08
    0.079471804 = product of:
      0.1986795 = sum of:
        0.049669877 = product of:
          0.14900963 = sum of:
            0.14900963 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14900963 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31815982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14900963 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14900963 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31815982 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037527647 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Dijk, J: ¬The digital divide (2020) 0.05
    0.05267715 = product of:
      0.26338574 = sum of:
        0.26338574 = weight(_text_:spaltung in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26338574 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3247029 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037527647 = queryNorm
            0.8111592 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    RSWK
    Digitale Spaltung
    Subject
    Digitale Spaltung
  4. Cloots, A.: Digitale Kompetenzen? : welche es braucht und wie man sie erlernt (2020) 0.03
    0.02804125 = product of:
      0.14020625 = sum of:
        0.14020625 = weight(_text_:informationsbeschaffung in 5707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14020625 = score(doc=5707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28172877 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5072327 = idf(docFreq=65, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037527647 = queryNorm
            0.49766392 = fieldWeight in 5707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5072327 = idf(docFreq=65, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5707)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Neue Technologien der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik fördern die digitale Transformation in der Arbeitswelt. Da aufgrund der technischen Möglichkeiten neue Anwendungsmöglichkeiten geschaffen werden, die Einfluss auf die inhaltliche und prozessuale Arbeitsgestaltung haben, verändert sich sowohl die inhaltliche als auch die prozessuale Arbeit. Vor diesem Hintergrund stellt sich insbesondere die Frage, welche digitalen Kompetenzen in welchen Branchen zukünftig benötigt werden, wie diese derzeit schon ausgebildet sind und welche Lernformen das Erlernen digitaler Kompetenzen erhöhen können. Die Studie zeigt, dass in allen Branchen die digitale Kompetenz der Informationsbeschaffung und der Kommunikation/Kollaboration am bedeutsamsten eingestuft werden. Mit Blick auf die Lernformen zeigt sich, dass Lernen insbesondere über Lesen und eigenständiges Lernen stattfindet und klassische Formen der Weiterbildung den Studienteilnehmenden weniger wichtig erscheinen. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser und weiterer Erkenntnisse werden Ansatzpunkte bzw. Denkanstöße für Organisationen abgeleitet.
  5. Seidler-de Alwis, R.: Informationsrecherche (2023) 0.03
    0.02804125 = product of:
      0.14020625 = sum of:
        0.14020625 = weight(_text_:informationsbeschaffung in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14020625 = score(doc=810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28172877 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5072327 = idf(docFreq=65, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037527647 = queryNorm
            0.49766392 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5072327 = idf(docFreq=65, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bei der Informationsrecherche z. B. für einen Vortrag, eine bestimmte Fragestellung oder bei der Einarbeitung in ein neues Aufgabengebiet etc. kann man schnell durch die endlose Informationsflut überfordert sein. Daher braucht es ein methodisches und strukturiertes Vorgehen, um relevante und verlässliche Informationen zu erhalten. Der Informationsrecherchevorgang beinhaltet, zuerst den Informationsbedarf zu erkennen und eine entsprechende Suchstrategie zu entwickeln. Das bedeutet eine sinnvolle Themeneingrenzung, Suchbegriffe festzulegen und auch die Art und Form der Informationen zu bestimmen. Bei der elektronischen Informationsbeschaffung gilt es zunächst, die Sucheingabe zu optimieren, z. B. über eine Stichwort- oder Schlagwortsuche und mit Hilfe der Verwendung von Filtern, Booleschen Operatoren, Trunkierungszeichen und anderen Suchfunktionen. Für die Qualitätssicherung in der Informationsrecherche, vor allem bei der Auswahl, Nutzung und Bewertung von Informationsressourcen, sind Quellenkenntnis, Quellenauswahl und Quellenbewertung zentrale Themen, denen sich dieser Beitrag in der Hauptsache widmet.
  6. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02
    0.023288373 = product of:
      0.05822093 = sum of:
        0.049669877 = product of:
          0.14900963 = sum of:
            0.14900963 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14900963 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31815982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008551054 = product of:
          0.02565316 = sum of:
            0.02565316 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02565316 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  7. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01
    0.008172088 = product of:
      0.04086044 = sum of:
        0.04086044 = product of:
          0.06129066 = sum of:
            0.030783791 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030783791 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.030506868 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030506868 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  8. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01
    0.008172088 = product of:
      0.04086044 = sum of:
        0.04086044 = product of:
          0.06129066 = sum of:
            0.030783791 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030783791 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.030506868 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030506868 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  9. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.0068100737 = product of:
      0.034050368 = sum of:
        0.034050368 = product of:
          0.051075548 = sum of:
            0.02565316 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02565316 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.02542239 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02542239 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.0068100737 = product of:
      0.034050368 = sum of:
        0.034050368 = product of:
          0.051075548 = sum of:
            0.02565316 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02565316 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.02542239 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02542239 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  11. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01
    0.0059243436 = product of:
      0.029621718 = sum of:
        0.029621718 = product of:
          0.08886515 = sum of:
            0.08886515 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08886515 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  12. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.00
    0.0047455127 = product of:
      0.023727564 = sum of:
        0.023727564 = product of:
          0.07118269 = sum of:
            0.07118269 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07118269 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  13. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.00
    0.0041045058 = product of:
      0.020522527 = sum of:
        0.020522527 = product of:
          0.061567582 = sum of:
            0.061567582 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061567582 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  14. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.00
    0.0041045058 = product of:
      0.020522527 = sum of:
        0.020522527 = product of:
          0.061567582 = sum of:
            0.061567582 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061567582 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  15. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.00
    0.0041045058 = product of:
      0.020522527 = sum of:
        0.020522527 = product of:
          0.061567582 = sum of:
            0.061567582 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061567582 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  16. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.00
    0.0041045058 = product of:
      0.020522527 = sum of:
        0.020522527 = product of:
          0.061567582 = sum of:
            0.061567582 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061567582 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  17. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.00
    0.0040675825 = product of:
      0.020337913 = sum of:
        0.020337913 = product of:
          0.061013736 = sum of:
            0.061013736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061013736 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  18. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.00
    0.0040675825 = product of:
      0.020337913 = sum of:
        0.020337913 = product of:
          0.061013736 = sum of:
            0.061013736 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061013736 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13141543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  19. Lauck, D.: Daran hakt es bei der Corona-App : Kampf gegen Pandemie (2020) 0.00
    0.0034204216 = product of:
      0.017102107 = sum of:
        0.017102107 = product of:
          0.05130632 = sum of:
            0.05130632 = weight(_text_:29 in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05130632 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2020 18:30:27
  20. Rötzer, F.: Droht bei einer Verschmelzung des Gehirns mit KI der Verlust des Bewusstseins? (2020) 0.00
    0.0034204216 = product of:
      0.017102107 = sum of:
        0.017102107 = product of:
          0.05130632 = sum of:
            0.05130632 = weight(_text_:29 in 5699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05130632 = score(doc=5699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13201053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037527647 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5699)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 70

Types

  • a 177
  • el 40
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…