-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.02
0.01653142 = product of:
0.055104733 = sum of:
0.0090681305 = weight(_text_:information in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0090681305 = score(doc=3033,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.031090142 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031090142 = score(doc=3033,freq=8.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.01494646 = product of:
0.02989292 = sum of:
0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02989292 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Tokita, T.; Koto, M.; Miyata, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Ueda, S.: Identifying works for Japanese classics toward construction of FRBRized OPACs (2012)
0.02
0.015916165 = product of:
0.05305388 = sum of:
0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 1925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365736 = score(doc=1925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1925)
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=1925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1925)
0.020925045 = product of:
0.04185009 = sum of:
0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04185009 = score(doc=1925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 1925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- A research project was conducted in which proper JAPAN/MARC bibliographic records for 158 major Japanese classical works were identified manually, since existing records contain little information about works included in the resources. This paper reports the detailed method used for work identification, including selecting works, obtaining the bibliographic records to be judged, and building the judgment criteria. The results of the work identification process are reported along with average numbers that indicate the characteristics of certain classics. The necessity of manual identification was justified through an evaluation of searches by author and/or title information in a conventional retrieval system.
-
Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994)
0.01
0.014974642 = product of:
0.04991547 = sum of:
0.00837678 = weight(_text_:information in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00837678 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.016666576 = product of:
0.033333153 = sum of:
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
-
Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996)
0.01
0.014974642 = product of:
0.04991547 = sum of:
0.00837678 = weight(_text_:information in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00837678 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
0.016666576 = product of:
0.033333153 = sum of:
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
-
Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996)
0.01
0.014974642 = product of:
0.04991547 = sum of:
0.00837678 = weight(_text_:information in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00837678 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.016666576 = product of:
0.033333153 = sum of:
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.01
0.014928766 = product of:
0.04976255 = sum of:
0.010881756 = weight(_text_:information in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010881756 = score(doc=941,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026380861 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.012499932 = product of:
0.024999864 = sum of:
0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024999864 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.01
0.014712521 = product of:
0.049041733 = sum of:
0.012695382 = weight(_text_:information in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012695382 = score(doc=771,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
- Footnote
- Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
-
Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented. Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996)
0.01
0.014329714 = product of:
0.04776571 = sum of:
0.008884916 = weight(_text_:information in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008884916 = score(doc=6734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026380861 = score(doc=6734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
0.012499932 = product of:
0.024999864 = sum of:
0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024999864 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.01
0.013430791 = product of:
0.06715395 = sum of:
0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062825847 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.06087137 = sum of:
0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035871506 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.278072 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024999864 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.01
0.013102811 = product of:
0.043676034 = sum of:
0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073296824 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Lau, S.-F.; Wang, V.: Chinese personal names and titles : issues in cataloging and retrieval (1993)
0.01
0.011637113 = product of:
0.058185562 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.0435262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0435262 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.52, [=Suppl.15]
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of a work : introduction (2002)
0.01
0.011637113 = product of:
0.058185562 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=5623,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
0.0435262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0435262 = score(doc=5623,freq=8.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this volume is to extend our understanding of the work entity and its role in information retrieval. Basic definitions are reviewed to provide a summary of current thought about works, their role in the catalog, and the potential for better accommodating them in future information retrieval environments. A discussion of entities for information retrieval and works as entities follows. Research in knowledge organization is summarized, indicating ways in which ontology, epistemology, and semiotics have lately been used as looking glasses through which to view the social informational roles of works.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.01
0.011192325 = product of:
0.055961624 = sum of:
0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005235487 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.050726138 = sum of:
0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02989292 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02083322 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
-
Andersen, J.: ¬The bibliographic record as text (2002)
0.01
0.010078036 = product of:
0.05039018 = sum of:
0.012695382 = weight(_text_:information in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012695382 = score(doc=5621,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
0.037694797 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037694797 = score(doc=5621,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- Conceptualizing the bibliographic record as text implies that it needs to be treated as such in order to fully exploit its function in information retrieval activities, which affects how access to works can be achieved. A theoretical framework is outlined, including methodological consequences in terms of how to go about teaching students of knowledge organization and users of information retrieval systems the literate activity of using the bibliographic record as a text. For knowledge organization research this implies that providing access to texts and the works they embody is not a technical matter, but rather a literate issue.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Hoffman, H.H.: Evaluation of three record types for component works in analytic online catalogs (1998)
0.01
0.00853763 = product of:
0.042688146 = sum of:
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.020925045 = product of:
0.04185009 = sum of:
0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04185009 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- When an item catalogued in a library's bibliographic database consists of more than a sole work, it may be difficult to link the works to the item. For the retrieval of such works, online catalogues currently rely on contents notes and added entry fields. Suggests 4 criteria for analytic catalogues: a search for a specific work should retrieve all units of that work; it should retrieve only that work without false drops; the search should require only one pass; and the resulting display should clearly collocate all retrieved works. Suggests that 'In' analytics as described in AACR2 rule 13.5A promise better results than analytic entries based on contents notes and added entries
-
Raghavan, K.S.; Neelameghan, A.: Composite multimedia works on CD : catalogue entry according to ISBD (ER) and AACR-2 Revision 1998 (2002)
0.01
0.008228681 = product of:
0.041143406 = sum of:
0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365736 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03077767 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- Gives operational definitions of work, associated work, composite work and other selected terms. Mentions the challenges posed by the abundant availability of digital resources in different media, forms and formats to catalogers in particular and information professionals in general. Discusses with examples the applicability and adequacy of the rules and prescriptions of ISBD(ER) and AACR2, 1998 rev. for cataloging multimedia resources on CD, in view of the fact that the record medium, the physical form and format affect the effectiveness of accessing, retrieval and use of a work.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
McEathron, S.: Cartographic materials as works (2002)
0.01
0.008228681 = product of:
0.041143406 = sum of:
0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365736 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03077767 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- The methods cartographers and publishers have used to compile and distribute maps in the past are central to historians of cartography in their thinking and documentation of them as works. This article presents case studies that describe the nature and characteristics of three works wherein the primary manifestations are cartographic. The cases are mapped into an entity-relationship model and include Ptolemy's Geographia, Martini's Novus Atlas Sinensis and Bailey's Ecoregions of the United States. Consideration is made of the implications of using cartographic works as entities for information retrieval.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Forassiepi, S.: ISBD and REICAT : a relationship between past, present, and future (2014)
0.01
0.008228681 = product of:
0.041143406 = sum of:
0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365736 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03077767 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- Libraries are faced with an epochal transformation: the emergence of a new structure of the web, the Semantic Web. The data structure will change completely in the next few years, leading to profound changes in information organization and retrieval. In this article I compare International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and Regole italiane di catalogazione (REICAT), the new Italian cataloging rules, to see when confronted with this phenomenon, how ready they are to structure bibliographic data in new ways to support information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships : linkages in the bibliographic universe (1994)
0.01
0.008031654 = product of:
0.04015827 = sum of:
0.0090681305 = weight(_text_:information in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0090681305 = score(doc=3043,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.031090142 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031090142 = score(doc=3043,freq=8.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- A major problem for bibliographic retrieval is an absence of explicit linkages to guide users among manifestations of a work. The purpose of this research was to enhance the power of bibliographic retrieval systems by providing contextual information about the derivative bibliographic relationship. Descriptive survey method was employed. A sample of 411 works from the Georgetown University on-line catalog was drawn. 49.9% of works were derivative. Age of a progenitor work is the characteristic most strongly associated with derivation; language and country of origin are indifferent predictors. Popularity of works might contribute to the phenomenon of derivation. The mean size of bibliographic families of derivative works was 8.44 members. The majority of bibliographic families had successive derivations, large groups of bibliographic families had translations and simultaneous editions; few had extractions, amplifications, or performances; none had adaptations. Successive derivations are the most commonly found members of bibliographic families, and are associated with most other types of derivation within bibliographic families. The bibliographic data required for explicit control of works might easily be compiled from existing records. The development of bibliographic retrieval systems in the network environment could play a dramatic role in improving retrieval of works
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Cross, P.: ¬A guide to citing Internet resources (1996)
0.01
0.007876225 = product of:
0.039381124 = sum of:
0.014509009 = weight(_text_:information in 392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014509009 = score(doc=392,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 392, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=392)
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=392)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- Gives recommendations on citing sources found on the Internet based on suggestions that seem most likely to be adopted by the UK information community. Describes the chosen style, gives advice for finding the information required for producing a reference, and discusses some of the issues involved, both for those wishing to cite online sources and those producing them
- Footnote
- Contribution to an issue devoted to information retrieval on the WWW
