Search (2156 results, page 1 of 108)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.05
    0.051843226 = product of:
      0.12960806 = sum of:
        0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014659365 = score(doc=1319,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
        0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03077767 = score(doc=1319,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
        0.069587775 = weight(_text_:ranking in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069587775 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
        0.014583254 = product of:
          0.029166508 = sum of:
            0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029166508 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998) 0.05
    0.048911355 = product of:
      0.122278385 = sum of:
        0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073296824 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03077767 = score(doc=2186,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.069587775 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069587775 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.014583254 = product of:
          0.029166508 = sum of:
            0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029166508 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:51
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  3. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.05
    0.04871589 = product of:
      0.12178972 = sum of:
        0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062825847 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018654086 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.08435312 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08435312 = score(doc=2742,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.5070964 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.012499932 = product of:
          0.024999864 = sum of:
            0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024999864 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    In this research, we aim to identify factors that significantly affect the clickthrough of Web searchers. Our underlying goal is determine more efficient methods to optimize the clickthrough rate. We devise a clickthrough metric for measuring customer satisfaction of search engine results using the number of links visited, number of queries a user submits, and rank of clicked links. We use a neural network to detect the significant influence of searching characteristics on future user clickthrough. Our results show that high occurrences of query reformulation, lengthy searching duration, longer query length, and the higher ranking of prior clicked links correlate positively with future clickthrough. We provide recommendations for leveraging these findings for improving the performance of search engine retrieval and result ranking, along with implications for search engine marketing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.557-570
  4. Schaefer, M.T.: Internet information retrieval for libraries : four keys & sites that use them (1998) 0.04
    0.039253592 = product of:
      0.13084531 = sum of:
        0.014509009 = weight(_text_:information in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014509009 = score(doc=99,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.03517448 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03517448 = score(doc=99,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.08116183 = sum of:
          0.04782867 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04782867 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
          0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033333153 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Provides illustrative examples of the methods, tools and resources that enable librarians, information specialists and end users to make the most of the WWW. The 4 key factors that facilitate access are location, evaluation, organization and communication. Outlines how a number of sistes make use of these factors. Describes: the Internet Library for Librarians, Argus Clearinghouse's Digital Librarian's Award; FEDSTATS, the University Library System, chines University of Hong Kong, the WWW Virtual Library, the Finnish Virtual Library Project, and BIBNET
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:19:44
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.8, S.1-3
  5. Moscoso, P.: Analisis y evaluacion de catalogos automatizados de acceso publico en entorno Web (1998) 0.04
    0.036517695 = product of:
      0.12172564 = sum of:
        0.00837678 = weight(_text_:information in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00837678 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
        0.07952888 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07952888 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
        0.03381998 = product of:
          0.06763996 = sum of:
            0.06763996 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06763996 = score(doc=3384,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.5243376 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the results of an evaluation of the Spanish Web OPACs. A checklist approach was employed to access the interface and searching options. Evaluates main page, labels, text, instructional information, online help and page layout. The data gathered allow for the ranking of the OPACs, as well as the identification of weaknesses in the catalogues
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Analysis and evaluation of online public access catalogues in the Web
  6. Davis, C.H.: From document retrieval to Web browsing : some universal concerns (1997) 0.04
    0.03529449 = product of:
      0.1176483 = sum of:
        0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010365736 = score(doc=399,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.037694797 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037694797 = score(doc=399,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.069587775 = weight(_text_:ranking in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069587775 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Computer based systems can produce enourmous retrieval sets even when good search logic is used. Sometimes this is desirable, more often it is not. Appropriate filters can limit search results, but they represent only a partial solution. Simple ranking techniques are needed that are both effective and easily understood by the humans doing the searching. Optimal search output, whether from a traditional database or the Internet, will result when intuitive interfaces are designed that inspire confidence while making the necessary mathematics transparent. Weighted term searching using powers of 2, a technique proposed early in the history of information retrieval, can be simplifies and used in combination with modern graphics and textual input to achieve these results
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.3, S.3-10
  7. Cooke, A.: ¬A guide to finding quality information on the Internet : selection and evaluation strategies (1999) 0.03
    0.02918245 = product of:
      0.09727483 = sum of:
        0.02341381 = weight(_text_:information in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02341381 = score(doc=662,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.0439681 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0439681 = score(doc=662,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.02989292 = product of:
          0.05978584 = sum of:
            0.05978584 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05978584 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.4634533 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Library information networks
    Subject
    Information retrieval
    Library information networks
  8. McMurdo, G.: Evaluating Web information and design (1998) 0.03
    0.027902514 = product of:
      0.13951257 = sum of:
        0.017769832 = weight(_text_:information in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017769832 = score(doc=2831,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
        0.12174274 = sum of:
          0.07174301 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07174301 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.556144 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
          0.04999973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04999973 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies and provides a digest of 'good practices' for the evaluation and design of Web sites
    Date
    22. 1.1999 18:38:39
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.3, S.192-204
  9. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference ; proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006 ; proceedings (2006) 0.03
    0.02782644 = product of:
      0.092754796 = sum of:
        0.009365524 = weight(_text_:information in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365524 = score(doc=2428,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
        0.032902714 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032902714 = score(doc=2428,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.3536936 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
        0.050486557 = sum of:
          0.03381998 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03381998 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.2621688 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
          0.016666576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016666576 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, ECDL 2006, held in Alicante, Spain in September 2006. The 36 revised full papers presented together with the extended abstracts of 18 demo papers and 15 revised poster papers were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 159 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on architectures, preservation, retrieval, applications, methodology, metadata, evaluation, user studies, modeling, audiovisual content, and language technologies.
    Content
    Inhalt u.a.: Architectures I Preservation Retrieval - The Use of Summaries in XML Retrieval / Zoltdn Szldvik, Anastasios Tombros, Mounia Laimas - An Enhanced Search Interface for Information Discovery from Digital Libraries / Georgia Koutrika, Alkis Simitsis - The TIP/Greenstone Bridge: A Service for Mobile Location-Based Access to Digital Libraries / Annika Hinze, Xin Gao, David Bainbridge Architectures II Applications Methodology Metadata Evaluation User Studies Modeling Audiovisual Content Language Technologies - Incorporating Cross-Document Relationships Between Sentences for Single Document Summarizations / Xiaojun Wan, Jianwu Yang, Jianguo Xiao - Semantic Web Techniques for Multiple Views on Heterogeneous Collections: A Case Study / Marjolein van Gendt, Antoine Isaac, Lourens van der Meij, Stefan Schlobach Posters - A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR / Trond Aalberg, Frank Berg Haugen, Ole Husby
    RSWK
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Alicante <2006>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Alicante <2006>
    Subject
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Alicante <2006>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Alicante <2006>
  10. Garnsey, M.R.: What distance learners should know about information retrieval on the World Wide Web (2002) 0.03
    0.027704712 = product of:
      0.09234904 = sum of:
        0.014048288 = weight(_text_:information in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048288 = score(doc=1626,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018654086 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059646662 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet can be a valuable tool allowing distance learners to access information not available locally. Search engines are the most common means of locating relevant information an the Internet, but to use them efficiently students should be taught the basics of searching and how to evaluate the results. This article briefly reviews how Search engines work, studies comparing Search engines, and criteria useful in evaluating the quality of returned Web pages. Research indicates there are statistical differences in the precision of Search engines, with AltaVista ranking high in several studies. When evaluating the quality of Web pages, standard criteria used in evaluating print resources is appropriate, as well as additional criteria which relate to the Web site itself. Giving distance learners training in how to use Search engines and how to evaluate the results will allow them to access relevant information efficiently while ensuring that it is of adequate quality.
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to "Distance learning: information access and services for virtual users", publ. by Haworth Press
  11. MacDougall, S.: Rethinking indexing : the impact of the Internet (1996) 0.03
    0.027693033 = product of:
      0.09231011 = sum of:
        0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062825847 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
        0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026380861 = score(doc=704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
        0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059646662 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the challenge to professional indexers posed by the Internet. Indexing and searching on the Internet appears to have a retrograde step, as well developed and efficient information retrieval techniques have been replaced by cruder techniques, involving automatic keyword indexing and frequency ranking, leading to large retrieval sets and low precision. This is made worse by the apparent acceptance of this poor perfromance by Internet users and the feeling, on the part of indexers, that they are being bypassed by the producers of these hyperlinked menus and search engines. Key issues are: how far 'human' indexing will still be required in the Internet environment; how indexing techniques will have to change to stay relevant; and the future role of indexers. The challenge facing indexers is to adapt their skills to suit the online environment and to convince publishers of the need for efficient indexes on the Internet
  12. Terliesner, J.: Information Retrieval in Wikis : wie können klassische Methoden des Information Retrievals die Suchfunktion eines Wikis bereichern? (2010) 0.03
    0.026754752 = product of:
      0.0891825 = sum of:
        0.010881756 = weight(_text_:information in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010881756 = score(doc=3504,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
        0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018654086 = score(doc=3504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
        0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059646662 = score(doc=3504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Wikis erfreuen sich als gemeinschaftliche Wissenssammlungen wachsender Beliebtheit. Wissenssammlungen können jedoch nur effektiv genutzt werden, wenn geeignete Suchwerkzeuge zur Verfügung stehen, die alle Besonderheiten der Suchumgebung berücksichtigen. Allerdings liefern Suchfunktionen in Wikis häufig nicht relevante Ergebnisse. Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Aufbau und die Funktionsweise einer optimierten Suchmaschine für Wikis, mit welcher dieser Missstand beseitigt werden soll. Um ein Suchergebnis als Ranking präsentieren zu können, muss dies nach bestimmten Kriterien erfolgen. Viele Kriterien aus dem Web können in Wikis nicht übernommen werden. Deshalb ist eine genaue Analyse der Struktur von Wikis erforderlich. Es wird beschrieben wie Suchergebnisse in Clustern dargestellt werden können, die auf der besonderen Struktur von Wikis beruhen. Dieser Artikel bildet die theoretische Grundlage für weitere Forschung, in der die vorgestellten Thesen analysiert werden und durch einen Retrievaltest bestätigt werden sollen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.2, S.117-121
  13. Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004) 0.03
    0.0261557 = product of:
      0.087185666 = sum of:
        0.008884916 = weight(_text_:information in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008884916 = score(doc=3090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018654086 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059646662 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Recent Web-searching and -mining tools are combining text and link analysis to improve ranking and crawling algorithms. The central assumption behind such approaches is that there is a correiation between the graph structure of the Web and the text and meaning of pages. Here I formalize and empirically evaluate two general conjectures drawing connections from link information to lexical and semantic Web content. The link-content conjecture states that a page is similar to the pages that link to it, and the link-cluster conjecture that pages about the same topic are clustered together. These conjectures are offen simply assumed to hold, and Web search tools are built an such assumptions. The present quantitative confirmation sheds light an the connection between the success of the latest Web-mining techniques and the small world topology of the Web, with encouraging implications for the design of better crawling algorithms.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1261-1269
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Keller, R.M.: ¬A bookmarking service for organizing and sharing URLs (1997) 0.03
    0.025082048 = product of:
      0.083606824 = sum of:
        0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062825847 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
        0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059646662 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
        0.017677575 = product of:
          0.03535515 = sum of:
            0.03535515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03535515 = score(doc=2721,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030753274 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Presents WebTagger, an implemented prototype of a personal book marking service that provides both individuals and groups with a customisable means of organizing and accessing Web-based information resources. The service enables users to supply feedback on the utility of these resources relative to their informatio needs, and provides dynamically updated ranking of resources based on incremental user feedback. Individuals may access the service from anywhere on the Internet and require no special software. The service simplifies the process of sharing URLs within groups, in comparison with manual methods involving email. The underlying bookmark organization scheme is more natural and flexible than current hierarchical schemes supported by the major Web browsers and enables rapid access to stored bookmarks
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    17. 1.1999 14:22:14
  15. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European conference, ECDL2003 Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003. Proceedings (2003) 0.02
    0.02486684 = product of:
      0.08288946 = sum of:
        0.011846555 = weight(_text_:information in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011846555 = score(doc=2426,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
        0.030461993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030461993 = score(doc=2426,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.32745665 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
        0.040580913 = sum of:
          0.023914335 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023914335 = score(doc=2426,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
          0.016666576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016666576 = score(doc=2426,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, ECDL 2003, held in Trondheim, Norway in August 2003. The 39 revised full papers and 8 revised short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 161 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on uses, users, and user interfaces; metadata applications; annotation and recommendation; automatic classification and indexing; Web technologies; topical crawling and subject gateways; architectures and systems; knowledge organization; collection building and management; information retrieval; digital preservation; and indexing and searching of special documents and collection information.
    Content
    Inhalt: Uses, Users, and User Interaction Metadata Applications - Semantic Browsing / Alexander Faaborg, Carl Lagoze Annotation and Recommendation Automatic Classification and Indexing - Cross-Lingual Text Categorization / Nuria Bel, Cornelis H.A. Koster, Marta Villegas - Automatic Multi-label Subject Indexing in a Multilingual Environment / Boris Lauser, Andreas Hotho Web Technologies Topical Crawling, Subject Gateways - VASCODA: A German Scientific Portal for Cross-Searching Distributed Digital Resource Collections / Heike Neuroth, Tamara Pianos Architectures and Systems Knowledge Organization: Concepts - The ADEPT Concept-Based Digital Learning Environment / T.R. Smith, D. Ancona, O. Buchel, M. Freeston, W. Heller, R. Nottrott, T. Tierney, A. Ushakov - A User Evaluation of Hierarchical Phrase Browsing / Katrina D. Edgar, David M. Nichols, Gordon W. Paynter, Kirsten Thomson, Ian H. Witten - Visual Semantic Modeling of Digital Libraries / Qinwei Zhu, Marcos Andre Gongalves, Rao Shen, Lillian Cassell, Edward A. Fox Collection Building and Management Knowledge Organization: Authorities and Works - Automatic Conversion from MARC to FRBR / Christian Monch, Trond Aalberg Information Retrieval in Different Application Areas Digital Preservation Indexing and Searching of Special Document and Collection Information
    RSWK
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Trondheim <2003>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Trondheim <2003>
    Subject
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Trondheim <2003>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Trondheim <2003>
  16. Oliveira Machado, L.M.; Souza, R.R.; Simões, M. da Graça: Semantic web or web of data? : a diachronic study (1999 to 2017) of the publications of Tim Berners-Lee and the World Wide Web Consortium (2019) 0.02
    0.024227323 = product of:
      0.08075774 = sum of:
        0.0090681305 = weight(_text_:information in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090681305 = score(doc=5300,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
        0.02198405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02198405 = score(doc=5300,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
        0.049705554 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049705554 = score(doc=5300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    The web has been, in the last decades, the place where information retrieval achieved its maximum importance, given its ubiquity and the sheer volume of information. However, its exponential growth made the retrieval task increasingly hard, relying in its effectiveness on idiosyncratic and somewhat biased ranking algorithms. To deal with this problem, a "new" web, called the Semantic Web (SW), was proposed, bringing along concepts like "Web of Data" and "Linked Data," although the definitions and connections among these concepts are often unclear. Based on a qualitative approach built over a literature review, a definition of SW is presented, discussing the related concepts sometimes used as synonyms. It concludes that the SW is a comprehensive and ambitious construct that includes the great purpose of making the web a global database. It also follows the specifications developed and/or associated with its operationalization and the necessary procedures for the connection of data in an open format on the web. The goals of this comprehensive SW are the union of two outcomes still tenuously connected: the virtually unlimited possibility of connections between data-the web domain-with the potentiality of the automated inference of "intelligent" systems-the semantic component.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.7, S.701-714
  17. Hasanain, M.; Elsayed, T.: Studying effectiveness of Web search for fact checking (2022) 0.02
    0.023077529 = product of:
      0.07692509 = sum of:
        0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005235487 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
        0.02198405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02198405 = score(doc=558,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
        0.049705554 = weight(_text_:ranking in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049705554 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Web search is commonly used by fact checking systems as a source of evidence for claim verification. In this work, we demonstrate that the task of retrieving pages useful for fact checking, called evidential pages, is indeed different from the task of retrieving topically relevant pages that are typically optimized by search engines; thus, it should be handled differently. We conduct a comprehensive study on the performance of retrieving evidential pages over a test collection we developed for the task of re-ranking Web pages by usefulness for fact-checking. Results show that pages (retrieved by a commercial search engine) that are topically relevant to a claim are not always useful for verifying it, and that the engine's performance in retrieving evidential pages is weakly correlated with retrieval of topically relevant pages. Additionally, we identify types of evidence in evidential pages and some linguistic cues that can help predict page usefulness. Moreover, preliminary experiments show that a retrieval model leveraging those cues has a higher performance compared to the search engine. Finally, we show that existing systems have a long way to go to support effective fact checking. To that end, our work provides insights to guide design of better future systems for the task.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.738-751
  18. Pu, H.-T.; Chuang, S.-L.; Yang, C.: Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests (2002) 0.02
    0.021796418 = product of:
      0.072654724 = sum of:
        0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007404097 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
        0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015545071 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
        0.049705554 = weight(_text_:ranking in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049705554 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Subject content analysis of Web query terms is essential to understand Web searching interests. Such analysis includes exploring search topics and observing changes in their frequency distributions with time. To provide a basis for in-depth analysis of users' search interests on a larger scale, this article presents a query categorization approach to automatically classifying Web query terms into broad subject categories. Because a query is short in length and simple in structure, its intended subject(s) of search is difficult to judge. Our approach, therefore, combines the search processes of real-world search engines to obtain highly ranked Web documents based on each unknown query term. These documents are used to extract cooccurring terms and to create a feature set. An effective ranking function has also been developed to find the most appropriate categories. Three search engine logs in Taiwan were collected and tested. They contained over 5 million queries from different periods of time. The achieved performance is quite encouraging compared with that of human categorization. The experimental results demonstrate that the approach is efficient in dealing with large numbers of queries and adaptable to the dynamic Web environment. Through good integration of human and machine efforts, the frequency distributions of subject categories in response to changes in users' search interests can be systematically observed in real time. The approach has also shown potential for use in various information retrieval applications, and provides a basis for further Web searching studies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.617-630
  19. Jepsen, E.T.; Seiden, P.; Ingwersen, P.; Björneborn, L.; Borlund, P.: Characteristics of scientific Web publications : preliminary data gathering and analysis (2004) 0.02
    0.021796418 = product of:
      0.072654724 = sum of:
        0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007404097 = score(doc=3091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
        0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015545071 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
        0.049705554 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049705554 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Because of the increasing presence of scientific publications an the Web, combined with the existing difficulties in easily verifying and retrieving these publications, research an techniques and methods for retrieval of scientific Web publications is called for. In this article, we report an the initial steps taken toward the construction of a test collection of scientific Web publications within the subject domain of plant biology. The steps reported are those of data gathering and data analysis aiming at identifying characteristics of scientific Web publications. The data used in this article were generated based an specifically selected domain topics that are searched for in three publicly accessible search engines (Google, AlITheWeb, and AItaVista). A sample of the retrieved hits was analyzed with regard to how various publication attributes correlated with the scientific quality of the content and whether this information could be employed to harvest, filter, and rank Web publications. The attributes analyzed were inlinks, outlinks, bibliographic references, file format, language, search engine overlap, structural position (according to site structure), and the occurrence of various types of metadata. As could be expected, the ranked output differs between the three search engines. Apparently, this is caused by differences in ranking algorithms rather than the databases themselves. In fact, because scientific Web content in this subject domain receives few inlinks, both AItaVista and AlITheWeb retrieved a higher degree of accessible scientific content than Google. Because of the search engine cutoffs of accessible URLs, the feasibility of using search engine output for Web content analysis is also discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1239-1249
  20. Bertot, J.C.; McClure, C.R.: Developing assessment techniques for statewide electronic networks (1996) 0.02
    0.020602169 = product of:
      0.10301084 = sum of:
        0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014659365 = score(doc=2173,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.08835147 = sum of:
          0.059184965 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059184965 = score(doc=2173,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.4587954 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
          0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029166508 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030753274 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study assessing statewide electronic network initiatives using the Maryland Sailor network as a case study. Aims to develop assessment techniques and indicators for the evaluation of statewide electronic networks. Defines key components of the statewide networked environment. Develops and operationalizes performance measures for networked information technologies and services provided through statewide networks. Explores several methods of evaluating statewide electronic networks. Identifies and discusses key issues and preliminary findings that affect the successful evaluation of statewide networked services
    Date
    7.11.1998 20:27:22
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 1825
  • m 209
  • s 91
  • el 65
  • r 18
  • x 10
  • b 4
  • i 4
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications