-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.03
0.029471725 = product of:
0.09823908 = sum of:
0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062825847 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.032309826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032309826 = score(doc=5698,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.059646662 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059646662 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
- Source
- Information world review. 1996, no.120, S.47-48
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014)
0.02
0.022611402 = product of:
0.07537134 = sum of:
0.008884916 = weight(_text_:information in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008884916 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026380861 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.040105563 = product of:
0.080211125 = sum of:
0.080211125 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080211125 = score(doc=1251,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.6217879 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.948-963
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.02
0.022461964 = product of:
0.07487321 = sum of:
0.0125651695 = weight(_text_:information in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125651695 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.03730817 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730817 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.024999864 = product of:
0.04999973 = sum of:
0.04999973 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04999973 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
- Theme
- Information Gateway
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.02
0.021206789 = product of:
0.10603394 = sum of:
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.08116183 = sum of:
0.04782867 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04782867 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.02
0.020081226 = product of:
0.06693742 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.037694797 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037694797 = score(doc=2509,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.02
0.01990502 = product of:
0.066350065 = sum of:
0.014509009 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014509009 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.03517448 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03517448 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.016666576 = product of:
0.033333153 = sum of:
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
- Theme
- Information Gateway
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (2005)
0.02
0.019043684 = product of:
0.06347895 = sum of:
0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007404097 = score(doc=4392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.041128393 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128393 = score(doc=4392,freq=14.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.442117 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.01494646 = product of:
0.02989292 = sum of:
0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02989292 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper was originally published in 1970 (Journal of documentation. 26(1970), S.89-101), considered the suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically and raised some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which were required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties had not been sufficiently considered, and the paper, therefore, aims to attempt an analysis of them, though no solutions of immediate application could be suggested. Design/methodology/approach - Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. Findings - Since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precise statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and, since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them. Originality/value - Gives insights into the classification of material for information retrieval.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.02
0.018718302 = product of:
0.062394336 = sum of:
0.010470974 = weight(_text_:information in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010470974 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.031090142 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031090142 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.02083322 = product of:
0.04166644 = sum of:
0.04166644 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04166644 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.02
0.018718302 = product of:
0.062394336 = sum of:
0.010470974 = weight(_text_:information in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010470974 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.031090142 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031090142 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.02083322 = product of:
0.04166644 = sum of:
0.04166644 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04166644 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Content
- Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001)
0.02
0.018009793 = product of:
0.09004896 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.075389594 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075389594 = score(doc=3826,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (1970)
0.02
0.017477833 = product of:
0.05825944 = sum of:
0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005235487 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.038077492 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038077492 = score(doc=4327,freq=12.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.01494646 = product of:
0.02989292 = sum of:
0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02989292 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- The suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically raises some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which are required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties have not been sufficiently considered, and the paper therefore attempts an analysis of them, though no solution of immediate application can be suggested. Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. The problem which follows is that since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precises statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.02
0.017212478 = product of:
0.05737493 = sum of:
0.0125651695 = weight(_text_:information in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125651695 = score(doc=3697,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.032309826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032309826 = score(doc=3697,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.012499932 = product of:
0.024999864 = sum of:
0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024999864 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:56
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.02
0.016615478 = product of:
0.083077386 = sum of:
0.04974423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04974423 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.033333153 = product of:
0.066666305 = sum of:
0.066666305 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066666305 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.02
0.015807183 = product of:
0.05269061 = sum of:
0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073296824 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03077767 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Hauffe, H.: Sacherschließung bibliographischer Datenbanken und ihre Nutzung im Information Retrieval : Vortrag anläßlich der Tagung 'Automatisierte Sacherschließung - Status und Trends, Schloß Hofen, Lochau bei Bregenz, 17.4.-20.4.1989.
0.02
0.015436965 = product of:
0.077184826 = sum of:
0.0125651695 = weight(_text_:information in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125651695 = score(doc=891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
0.06461965 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06461965 = score(doc=891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Gödert, W.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1990)
0.02
0.015436965 = product of:
0.077184826 = sum of:
0.0125651695 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125651695 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.06461965 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06461965 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification as an online retrieval tool : potentials and limitations (1986)
0.02
0.015242942 = product of:
0.07621471 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
0.06155534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06155534 = score(doc=1145,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 5(1986), S.181-192
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.014974642 = product of:
0.04991547 = sum of:
0.00837678 = weight(_text_:information in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00837678 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024872115 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.016666576 = product of:
0.033333153 = sum of:
0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033333153 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998)
0.01
0.014712521 = product of:
0.049041733 = sum of:
0.012695382 = weight(_text_:information in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012695382 = score(doc=2342,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.01
0.014013627 = product of:
0.046712086 = sum of:
0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365736 = score(doc=1673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0217631 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.014583254 = product of:
0.029166508 = sum of:
0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029166508 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Abstract
- The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
