-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.46
0.45703867 = product of:
0.7617311 = sum of:
0.05698508 = product of:
0.17095524 = sum of:
0.17095524 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17095524 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17095524 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17095524 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17095524 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17095524 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.020925045 = product of:
0.04185009 = sum of:
0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04185009 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.44
0.43888023 = product of:
0.87776047 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(5/10)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.44
0.43888023 = product of:
0.87776047 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(5/10)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.42
0.42331773 = product of:
0.84663546 = sum of:
0.06512581 = product of:
0.19537741 = sum of:
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(5/10)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.42
0.42331773 = product of:
0.84663546 = sum of:
0.06512581 = product of:
0.19537741 = sum of:
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(5/10)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.39
0.38848594 = product of:
0.64747655 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.012499932 = product of:
0.024999864 = sum of:
0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024999864 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.39
0.38682753 = product of:
0.9670688 = sum of:
0.2417672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2417672 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2417672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2417672 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2417672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2417672 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2417672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2417672 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.39
0.38631693 = product of:
0.64386153 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.008884916 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008884916 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.38
0.38475552 = product of:
0.6412592 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062825847 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.32
0.3206296 = product of:
0.53438264 = sum of:
0.04070363 = product of:
0.12211088 = sum of:
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005235487 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
- Theme
- Information
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.32
0.3206296 = product of:
0.53438264 = sum of:
0.04070363 = product of:
0.12211088 = sum of:
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005235487 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12211088 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6 = coord(6/10)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
- Theme
- Information
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.32
0.3174883 = product of:
0.6349766 = sum of:
0.048844352 = product of:
0.14653306 = sum of:
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14653306 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(5/10)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.31
0.31260386 = product of:
0.78150964 = sum of:
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Fan, W.; Gordon, M.D.; Pathak, P.: ¬A generic ranking function discovery framework by genetic programming for information retrieval (2004)
0.10
0.099404015 = product of:
0.24851003 = sum of:
0.012695382 = weight(_text_:information in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012695382 = score(doc=2554,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03077767 = score(doc=2554,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.18411194 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18411194 = score(doc=2554,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
1.1068056 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.020925045 = product of:
0.04185009 = sum of:
0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04185009 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Abstract
- Ranking functions play a substantial role in the performance of information retrieval (IR) systems and search engines. Although there are many ranking functions available in the IR literature, various empirical evaluation studies show that ranking functions do not perform consistently well across different contexts (queries, collections, users). Moreover, it is often difficult and very expensive for human beings to design optimal ranking functions that work well in all these contexts. In this paper, we propose a novel ranking function discovery framework based on Genetic Programming and show through various experiments how this new framework helps automate the ranking function design/discovery process.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.587-602
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.09
0.088760436 = product of:
0.2958681 = sum of:
0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014659365 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.13917555 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13917555 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.8366664 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.14203319 = sum of:
0.08370018 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08370018 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.64883465 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.058333017 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058333017 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Source
- Library and information research news. 24(2000) no.77, S.30-34
-
Ro, J.S.: ¬An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval : 1. On the effectiveness of full-text retrieval (1988)
0.09
0.08819669 = product of:
0.22049172 = sum of:
0.0125651695 = weight(_text_:information in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125651695 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.052761722 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052761722 = score(doc=4030,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.119293325 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119293325 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.71714264 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.035871506 = product of:
0.07174301 = sum of:
0.07174301 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07174301 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.556144 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.73-78
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.09
0.08784055 = product of:
0.21960138 = sum of:
0.005235487 = weight(_text_:information in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005235487 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015545071 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.111145 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111145 = score(doc=5697,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.66815823 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.087675825 = sum of:
0.06684261 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06684261 = score(doc=5697,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.5181566 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02083322 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Abstract
- The performance of 8 ranking algorithms was evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in ranking terms for query expansion. The evaluation was conducted within an investigation of interactive query expansion and relevance feedback in a real operational environment. Focuses on the identification of algorithms that most effectively take cognizance of user preferences. user choices (i.e. the terms selected by the searchers for the query expansion search) provided the yardstick for the evaluation of the 8 ranking algorithms. This methodology introduces a user oriented approach in evaluating ranking algorithms for query expansion in contrast to the standard, system oriented approaches. Similarities in the performance of the 8 algorithms and the ways these algorithms rank terms were the main focus of this evaluation. The findings demonstrate that the r-lohi, wpq, enim, and porter algorithms have similar performance in bringing good terms to the top of a ranked list of terms for query expansion. However, further evaluation of the algorithms in different (e.g. full text) environments is needed before these results can be generalized beyond the context of the present study
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.605-620
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011)
0.08
0.07868701 = product of:
0.19671753 = sum of:
0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007404097 = score(doc=444,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015545071 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.08609255 = weight(_text_:ranking in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609255 = score(doc=444,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.51755315 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.087675825 = sum of:
0.06684261 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06684261 = score(doc=444,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.5181566 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02083322 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Abstract
- This paper aims to review the fiercely discussed question of whether the ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines is justified by the quality of the articles. After an overview of current research on information quality in Wikipedia, a summary of the extended discussion on the quality of encyclopedic entries in general is given. On this basis, a heuristic method for evaluating Wikipedia entries is developed and applied to Wikipedia articles that scored highly in a search engine retrieval effectiveness test and compared with the relevance judgment of jurors. In all search engines tested, Wikipedia results are unanimously judged better by the jurors than other results on the corresponding results position. Relevance judgments often roughly correspond with the results from the heuristic evaluation. Cases in which high relevance judgments are not in accordance with the comparatively low score from the heuristic evaluation are interpreted as an indicator of a high degree of trust in Wikipedia. One of the systemic shortcomings of Wikipedia lies in its necessarily incoherent user model. A further tuning of the suggested criteria catalog, for instance, the different weighing of the supplied criteria, could serve as a starting point for a user model differentiated evaluation of Wikipedia articles. Approved methods of quality evaluation of reference works are applied to Wikipedia articles and integrated with the question of search engine evaluation.
- Date
- 30. 9.2012 19:27:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.117-132
-
Qin, T.; Zhang, X.-D.; Tsai, M.-F.; Wang, D.-S.; Liu, T.-Y.; Li, H.: Query-level loss functions for information retrieval (2008)
0.08
0.07711129 = product of:
0.19277821 = sum of:
0.0090681305 = weight(_text_:information in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0090681305 = score(doc=2066,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
0.02198405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02198405 = score(doc=2066,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
0.14058854 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14058854 = score(doc=2066,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.8451607 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
0.021137487 = product of:
0.042274974 = sum of:
0.042274974 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042274974 = score(doc=2066,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.327711 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Abstract
- Many machine learning technologies such as support vector machines, boosting, and neural networks have been applied to the ranking problem in information retrieval. However, since originally the methods were not developed for this task, their loss functions do not directly link to the criteria used in the evaluation of ranking. Specifically, the loss functions are defined on the level of documents or document pairs, in contrast to the fact that the evaluation criteria are defined on the level of queries. Therefore, minimizing the loss functions does not necessarily imply enhancing ranking performances. To solve this problem, we propose using query-level loss functions in learning of ranking functions. We discuss the basic properties that a query-level loss function should have and propose a query-level loss function based on the cosine similarity between a ranking list and the corresponding ground truth. We further design a coordinate descent algorithm, referred to as RankCosine, which utilizes the proposed loss function to create a generalized additive ranking model. We also discuss whether the loss functions of existing ranking algorithms can be extended to query-level. Experimental results on the datasets of TREC web track, OHSUMED, and a commercial web search engine show that with the use of the proposed query-level loss function we can significantly improve ranking accuracies. Furthermore, we found that it is difficult to extend the document-level loss functions to query-level loss functions.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.838-855
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.07
0.07191082 = product of:
0.17977704 = sum of:
0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007404097 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.026924854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026924854 = score(doc=2591,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.08609255 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609255 = score(doc=2591,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.51755315 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.059355542 = sum of:
0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02989292 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.029462622 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029462622 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030753274 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.4 = coord(4/10)
- Abstract
- Purpose In a system-based approach, replicating the web would require large test collections, and judging the relevancy of all documents per topic in creating relevance judgment through human assessors is infeasible. Due to the large amount of documents that requires judgment, there are possible errors introduced by human assessors because of disagreements. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study explores exponential variation and document ranking methods that generate a reliable set of relevance judgments (pseudo relevance judgments) to reduce human efforts. These methods overcome problems with large amounts of documents for judgment while avoiding human disagreement errors during the judgment process. This study utilizes two key factors: number of occurrences of each document per topic from all the system runs; and document rankings to generate the alternate methods. Findings The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated using the correlation coefficient of ranked systems using mean average precision scores between the original Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) relevance judgments and pseudo relevance judgments. The results suggest that the proposed document ranking method with a pool depth of 100 could be a reliable alternative to reduce human effort and disagreement errors involved in generating TREC-like relevance judgments. Originality/value Simple methods proposed in this study show improvement in the correlation coefficient in generating alternate relevance judgment without human assessors while contributing to information retrieval evaluation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
