Search (4371 results, page 1 of 219)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.63 
    0.6349766 = product of:
  1.2699533 = sum of:
    0.097688705 = product of:
      0.2930661 = sum of:
        0.2930661 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2930661 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2930661 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2930661 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.2930661 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2930661 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.2930661 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2930661 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.2930661 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2930661 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.57 
    0.5686467 = product of:
  0.7108084 = sum of:
    0.032562904 = product of:
      0.097688705 = sum of:
        0.097688705 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097688705 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13815269 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13815269 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13815269 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13815269 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.011846555 = weight(_text_:information in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011846555 = score(doc=5820,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024872115 = score(doc=5820,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13815269 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13815269 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.088916 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088916 = score(doc=5820,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5345266 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13815269 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13815269 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.8 = coord(8/10)
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.53 
    0.52914715 = product of:
  1.0582943 = sum of:
    0.08140726 = product of:
      0.24422176 = sum of:
        0.24422176 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24422176 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24422176 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24422176 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.24422176 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24422176 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.24422176 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24422176 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.24422176 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24422176 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.45 
    0.44888148 = product of:
  0.74813575 = sum of:
    0.05698508 = product of:
      0.17095524 = sum of:
        0.17095524 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17095524 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17095524 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17095524 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073296824 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17095524 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.17095524 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17095524 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.6 = coord(6/10)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  5. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.44 
    0.43888023 = product of:
  0.87776047 = sum of:
    0.048844352 = product of:
      0.14653306 = sum of:
        0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14653306 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.20722903 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20722903 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  6. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.44 
    0.43649817 = product of:
  0.62356883 = sum of:
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062825847 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018654086 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.012499932 = product of:
      0.024999864 = sum of:
        0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024999864 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.7 = coord(7/10)
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  7. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.38 
    0.38475552 = product of:
  0.6412592 = sum of:
    0.048844352 = product of:
      0.14653306 = sum of:
        0.14653306 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062825847 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.14653306 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14653306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.6 = coord(6/10)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  8. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.32 
    0.32193077 = product of:
  0.53655124 = sum of:
    0.04070363 = product of:
      0.12211088 = sum of:
        0.12211088 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12211088 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007404097 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.6 = coord(6/10)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Imprint
    Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science
  9. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.31 
    0.31260386 = product of:
  0.78150964 = sum of:
    0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.19537741 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19537741 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  10. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.26 
    0.26457357 = product of:
  0.52914715 = sum of:
    0.04070363 = product of:
      0.12211088 = sum of:
        0.12211088 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12211088 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  11. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.26 
    0.26457357 = product of:
  0.52914715 = sum of:
    0.04070363 = product of:
      0.12211088 = sum of:
        0.12211088 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12211088 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.12211088 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12211088 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2607266 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  12. Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011) 0.08 
    0.07868701 = product of:
  0.19671753 = sum of:
    0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007404097 = score(doc=444,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
    0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015545071 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
    0.08609255 = weight(_text_:ranking in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08609255 = score(doc=444,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.51755315 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
    0.087675825 = sum of:
      0.06684261 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06684261 = score(doc=444,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.5181566 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02083322 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    This paper aims to review the fiercely discussed question of whether the ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines is justified by the quality of the articles. After an overview of current research on information quality in Wikipedia, a summary of the extended discussion on the quality of encyclopedic entries in general is given. On this basis, a heuristic method for evaluating Wikipedia entries is developed and applied to Wikipedia articles that scored highly in a search engine retrieval effectiveness test and compared with the relevance judgment of jurors. In all search engines tested, Wikipedia results are unanimously judged better by the jurors than other results on the corresponding results position. Relevance judgments often roughly correspond with the results from the heuristic evaluation. Cases in which high relevance judgments are not in accordance with the comparatively low score from the heuristic evaluation are interpreted as an indicator of a high degree of trust in Wikipedia. One of the systemic shortcomings of Wikipedia lies in its necessarily incoherent user model. A further tuning of the suggested criteria catalog, for instance, the different weighing of the supplied criteria, could serve as a starting point for a user model differentiated evaluation of Wikipedia articles. Approved methods of quality evaluation of reference works are applied to Wikipedia articles and integrated with the question of search engine evaluation.
    Date
    30. 9.2012 19:27:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.117-132
  13. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.07 
    0.07191082 = product of:
  0.17977704 = sum of:
    0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007404097 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
    0.026924854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026924854 = score(doc=2591,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
    0.08609255 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08609255 = score(doc=2591,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.51755315 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
    0.059355542 = sum of:
      0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02989292 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.029462622 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029462622 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose In a system-based approach, replicating the web would require large test collections, and judging the relevancy of all documents per topic in creating relevance judgment through human assessors is infeasible. Due to the large amount of documents that requires judgment, there are possible errors introduced by human assessors because of disagreements. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study explores exponential variation and document ranking methods that generate a reliable set of relevance judgments (pseudo relevance judgments) to reduce human efforts. These methods overcome problems with large amounts of documents for judgment while avoiding human disagreement errors during the judgment process. This study utilizes two key factors: number of occurrences of each document per topic from all the system runs; and document rankings to generate the alternate methods. Findings The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated using the correlation coefficient of ranked systems using mean average precision scores between the original Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) relevance judgments and pseudo relevance judgments. The results suggest that the proposed document ranking method with a pool depth of 100 could be a reliable alternative to reduce human effort and disagreement errors involved in generating TREC-like relevance judgments. Originality/value Simple methods proposed in this study show improvement in the correlation coefficient in generating alternate relevance judgment without human assessors while contributing to information retrieval evaluation.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
  14. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.07 
    0.06946384 = product of:
  0.69463843 = sum of:
    0.69463843 = product of:
      1.0419576 = sum of:
        0.548263 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.548263 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29987448 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.49369454 = weight(_text_:a4t in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49369454 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33840105 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  15. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.07 
    0.06874705 = product of:
  0.17186762 = sum of:
    0.010881756 = weight(_text_:information in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010881756 = score(doc=4910,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
    0.032309826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032309826 = score(doc=4910,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
    0.103311054 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103311054 = score(doc=4910,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.62106377 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
    0.025364986 = product of:
      0.05072997 = sum of:
        0.05072997 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05072997 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.3932532 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertdienste für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die typische Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden in diesem Buch ausführlich beschrieben und evaluiert. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sind in das GESIS-Projekt IRM eingeflossen.
    RSWK
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
    Subject
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
  16. Teevan, J.; Dumais, S.: Web retrieval, ranking and personalization (2011) 0.06 
    0.06461708 = product of:
  0.21539026 = sum of:
    0.014659365 = weight(_text_:information in 551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014659365 = score(doc=551,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 551, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=551)
    0.06155534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06155534 = score(doc=551,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 551, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=551)
    0.13917555 = weight(_text_:ranking in 551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917555 = score(doc=551,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.8366664 = fieldWeight in 551, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=551)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Source
    Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
  17. Efron, M.; Winget, M.: Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments (2010) 0.06 
    0.06340378 = product of:
  0.15850943 = sum of:
    0.010881756 = weight(_text_:information in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010881756 = score(doc=3469,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
    0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026380861 = score(doc=3469,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
    0.103311054 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103311054 = score(doc=3469,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.62106377 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
    0.017935753 = product of:
      0.035871506 = sum of:
        0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035871506 = score(doc=3469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.278072 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    Ranking information retrieval (IR) systems with respect to their effectiveness is a crucial operation during IR evaluation, as well as during data fusion. This article offers a novel method of approaching the system-ranking problem, based on the widely studied idea of polyrepresentation. The principle of polyrepresentation suggests that a single information need can be represented by many query articulations-what we call query aspects. By skimming the top k (where k is small) documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we collect a set of documents that are likely to be relevant to a given test topic. Labeling these skimmed documents as putatively relevant lets us build pseudorelevance judgments without undue human intervention. We report experiments where using these pseudorelevance judgments delivers a rank ordering of IR systems that correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1081-1091
  18. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Mehrwertdienste für das Information Retrieval (2013) 0.06 
    0.06297775 = product of:
  0.15744437 = sum of:
    0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073296824 = score(doc=935,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
    0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03077767 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
    0.09841198 = weight(_text_:ranking in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09841198 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5916125 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
    0.020925045 = product of:
      0.04185009 = sum of:
        0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04185009 = score(doc=935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    Ziel des Projekts ist die Entwicklung und Erprobung von metadatenbasierten Mehr-wertdiensten für Retrievalumgebungen mit mehreren Datenbanken: a) Search Term Recommender (STR) als Dienst zum automatischen Vorschlagen von Suchbegriffen aus kontrollierten Vokabularen, b) Bradfordizing als Dienst zum Re-Ranking von Ergebnismengen nach Kernzeitschriften und c) Autorenzentralität als Dienst zum Re-Ranking von. Ergebnismengen nach Zentralität der Autoren in Autorennetzwerken. Schwerpunkt des Projektes ist die prototypische mplementierung der drei Mehrwertdienste in einer integrierten Retrieval-Testumgebung und insbesondere deren quantitative und qualitative Evaluation hinsichtlich Verbesserung der Retrievalqualität bei Einsatz der Mehrwertdienste.
  19. Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016) 0.06 
    0.06222055 = product of:
  0.20740183 = sum of:
    0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062825847 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
    0.18861932 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18861932 = score(doc=2652,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        1.1339021 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
    0.012499932 = product of:
      0.024999864 = sum of:
        0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024999864 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) uses six university performance indicators, including "Alumni" and "Awards"-the number of alumni and staff winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals. These two indicators raised doubts about the reliability of this ranking method because they are difficult to cope with. Recently, a newsletter was published featuring a reduced ARWU ranking list, leaving out Nobel Prize and Fields Medal indicators: the Alternative Ranking (Excluding Award Factor). We used uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to examine and compare the stability and confidence of the official ARWU ranking and the Alternative Ranking. The results indicate that if the ARWU ranking is reduced to the 4-indicator Alternative Ranking, it shows greater certainty and stability in ranking universities.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:40:53
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.480-482
  20. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.06 
    0.058814585 = product of:
  0.14703646 = sum of:
    0.010470974 = weight(_text_:information in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010470974 = score(doc=664,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015545071 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.07029427 = weight(_text_:ranking in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07029427 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.050726138 = sum of:
      0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02989292 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02083322 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Abstract
    A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.500-515

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3936
  • el 272
  • m 272
  • s 88
  • x 59
  • r 17
  • b 6
  • n 6
  • i 3
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications