Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Mayr, P."
  1. Mayr, P.; Zapilko, B.; Sure, Y.: ¬Ein Mehr-Thesauri-Szenario auf Basis von SKOS und Crosskonkordanzen (2010) 0.01
    0.011591372 = product of:
      0.0811396 = sum of:
        0.0811396 = weight(_text_:wirtschaft in 3392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0811396 = score(doc=3392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2144363 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.707926 = idf(docFreq=398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.37838557 = fieldWeight in 3392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.707926 = idf(docFreq=398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3392)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Im August 2009 wurde SKOS "Simple Knowledge Organization System" als neuer Standard für web-basierte kontrollierte Vokabulare durch das W3C veröffentlicht1. SKOS dient als Datenmodell, um kontrollierte Vokabulare über das Web anzubieten sowie technisch und semantisch interoperabel zu machen. Perspektivisch kann die heterogene Landschaft der Erschließungsvokabulare über SKOS vereinheitlicht und vor allem die Inhalte der klassischen Datenbanken (Bereich Fachinformation) für Anwendungen des Semantic Web, beispielsweise als Linked Open Data2 (LOD), zugänglich und stär-ker miteinander vernetzt werden. Vokabulare im SKOS-Format können dabei eine relevante Funktion einnehmen, indem sie als standardisiertes Brückenvokabular dienen und semantische Verlinkung zwischen erschlossenen, veröffentlichten Daten herstellen. Die folgende Fallstudie skizziert ein Szenario mit drei thematisch verwandten Thesauri, die ins SKOS-Format übertragen und inhaltlich über Crosskonkordanzen aus dem Projekt KoMoHe verbunden werden. Die Mapping Properties von SKOS bieten dazu standardisierte Relationen, die denen der Crosskonkordanzen entsprechen. Die beteiligten Thesauri der Fallstudie sind a) TheSoz (Thesaurus Sozialwissenschaften, GESIS), b) STW (Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft, ZBW) und c) IBLK-Thesaurus (SWP).
  2. Mayr, P.: ¬Die virtuelle Steinsuppe : kooperatives Verwalten von elektronischen Ressourcen mit Digilink (2007) 0.01
    0.008048056 = product of:
      0.028168194 = sum of:
        0.014471739 = weight(_text_:information in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014471739 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.013696454 = product of:
          0.041089363 = sum of:
            0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041089363 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Wa(h)re Information: 29. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag Bregenz, 19.-23.9.2006. Hrsg.: Harald Weigel
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  3. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Mapping Knowledge Organization Systems (2008) 0.01
    0.007881311 = product of:
      0.055169173 = sum of:
        0.055169173 = weight(_text_:medien in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055169173 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17681947 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  4. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Cross-concordances : terminology mapping and its effectiveness for information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.006732995 = product of:
      0.023565482 = sum of:
        0.0132931415 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0132931415 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
        0.010272342 = product of:
          0.030817024 = sum of:
            0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030817024 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative, which found its conclusion in 2007. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'cross-concordances' between controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. 64 crosswalks with more than 500,000 relations were established. In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment was conducted. The paper reports on the cross-concordance work and evaluation results.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:33:29
  5. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.01
    0.0060096397 = product of:
      0.021033738 = sum of:
        0.010853804 = weight(_text_:information in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010853804 = score(doc=328,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
        0.010179935 = product of:
          0.030539803 = sum of:
            0.030539803 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539803 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird ein Eyetracking-Experiment beschrieben, bei dem untersucht wurde, wann und auf Basis welcher Informationen Relevanzentscheidungen bei der themenbezogenen Dokumentenbewertung fallen und welche Faktoren auf die Relevanzentscheidung einwirken. Nach einer kurzen Einführung werden relevante Studien aufgeführt, in denen Eyetracking als Untersuchungsmethode für Interaktionsverhalten mit Ergebnislisten (Information Seeking Behavior) verwendet wurde. Nutzerverhalten wird hierbei vor allem durch unterschiedliche Aufgaben-Typen, dargestellte Informationen und durch das Ranking eines Ergebnisses beeinflusst. Durch EyetrackingUntersuchungen lassen sich Nutzer außerdem in verschiedene Klassen von Bewertungs- und Lesetypen einordnen. Diese Informationen können als implizites Feedback genutzt werden, um so die Suche zu personalisieren und um die Relevanz von Suchergebnissen ohne aktives Zutun des Users zu erhöhen. In einem explorativen Eyetracking-Experiment mit 12 Studenten der Hochschule Darmstadt werden anhand der Länge der Gesamtbewertung, Anzahl der Fixationen, Anzahl der besuchten Metadatenelemente und Länge des Scanpfades zwei typische Bewertungstypen identifiziert. Das Metadatenfeld Abstract wird im Experiment zuverlässig als wichtigste Dokumenteigenschaft für die Zuordnung von Relevanz ermittelt.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.145-156
  6. Mayr, P.; Tosques, F.: Webometrische Analysen mit Hilfe der Google Web APIs (2005) 0.01
    0.00598238 = product of:
      0.02093833 = sum of:
        0.008953932 = weight(_text_:information in 3189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008953932 = score(doc=3189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3189)
        0.011984399 = product of:
          0.035953194 = sum of:
            0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 3189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035953194 = score(doc=3189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3189)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2005 18:29:36
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.1, S.41-48
  7. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011) 0.01
    0.005127755 = product of:
      0.017947141 = sum of:
        0.0076747984 = weight(_text_:information in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076747984 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
        0.010272342 = product of:
          0.030817024 = sum of:
            0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030817024 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2011 17:47:29
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.3-10
  8. Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008) 0.01
    0.0050080335 = product of:
      0.017528117 = sum of:
        0.009044836 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009044836 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.0084832795 = product of:
          0.025449837 = sum of:
            0.025449837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025449837 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization systems (KOS), like thesauri and other controlled vocabularies, are used to provide subject access to information systems across the web. Due to the heterogeneity of these systems, mapping between vocabularies becomes crucial for retrieving relevant information. However, mapping thesauri is a laborious task, and thus big efforts are being made to automate the mapping process. This paper examines two mapping approaches involving the agricultural thesaurus AGROVOC, one machine-created and one human created. We are addressing the basic question "What are the pros and cons of human and automatic mapping and how can they complement each other?" By pointing out the difficulties in specific cases or groups of cases and grouping the sample into simple and difficult types of mappings, we show the limitations of current automatic methods and come up with some basic recommendations on what approach to use when.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  9. Mayr, P.; Scharnhorst, A.: Scientometrics and information retrieval - weak-links revitalized (2015) 0.00
    0.003101087 = product of:
      0.021707607 = sum of:
        0.021707607 = weight(_text_:information in 1688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021707607 = score(doc=1688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1688)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Editorial zu einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
  10. Mutschke, P.; Mayr, P.: Science models for search : a study on combining scholarly information retrieval and scientometrics (2015) 0.00
    0.002584239 = product of:
      0.018089673 = sum of:
        0.018089673 = weight(_text_:information in 1695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018089673 = score(doc=1695,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1695, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1695)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
  11. Carevic, Z.; Krichel, T.; Mayr, P.: Assessing a human mediated current awareness service (2015) 0.00
    0.002584239 = product of:
      0.018089673 = sum of:
        0.018089673 = weight(_text_:information in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018089673 = score(doc=2992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  12. Mayr, P.; Umstätter, W.: ¬Eine bibliometrische Zeitschriftenanalyse mit Jol Scientrometrics und NfD bzw. IWP (2008) 0.00
    0.0022155237 = product of:
      0.015508666 = sum of:
        0.015508666 = weight(_text_:information in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015508666 = score(doc=2302,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In der Studie sind 3.889 Datensätze analysiert worden, die im Zeitraum 1976-2004 in der Datenbank Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) im Forschungsbereich der Informetrie nachgewiesen sind und das Wachstum auf diesem Gebiet belegen. Die Studie zeigt anhand einer Bradford-Verteilung (power law) die Kernzeitschriften in diesem Feld und bestätigt auf der Basis dieses LISA-Datensatzes, dass die Gründung einer neuen Zeitschrift, "Journals of Informetrics" (JoI), 2007 etwa zur rechten Zeit erfolgte. Im Verhältnis dazu wird die Entwicklung der Zeitschrift Scientometrics betrachtet und auch die der "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) bzw. "Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis" (IWP).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.6/7, S.353-360
  13. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.00
    0.0018990203 = product of:
      0.0132931415 = sum of:
        0.0132931415 = weight(_text_:information in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0132931415 = score(doc=4910,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    RSWK
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
    Subject
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
  14. Daniel, F.; Maier, C.; Mayr, P.; Wirtz, H.-C.: ¬Die Kunden dort bedienen, wo sie sind : DigiAuskunft besteht Bewährungsprobe / Seit Anfang 2006 in Betrieb (2006) 0.00
    0.0016966559 = product of:
      0.011876591 = sum of:
        0.011876591 = product of:
          0.03562977 = sum of:
            0.03562977 = weight(_text_:22 in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03562977 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2006 21:06:22
  15. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.00
    0.0016966559 = product of:
      0.011876591 = sum of:
        0.011876591 = product of:
          0.03562977 = sum of:
            0.03562977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03562977 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  16. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008) 0.00
    0.0015825169 = product of:
      0.011077618 = sum of:
        0.011077618 = weight(_text_:information in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011077618 = score(doc=1909,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  17. Mayr, P.: DigiLink - Die dritte Generation der Linklisten (2005) 0.00
    0.0014618665 = product of:
      0.010233065 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Crosskonkordanzen (2007) 0.00
    0.0014618665 = product of:
      0.010233065 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    http://www.gesis.org/Information/Forschungsuebersichten/Tagungsberichte/Vernetzung/Mayr-Walter.pdf
  19. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.00
    0.0014618665 = product of:
      0.010233065 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  20. Krause, J.; Mayr, P.: Allgemeiner Bibliothekszugang und Varianten der Suchtypologie : Konsequenzen für die Modellbildung in vascoda (2007) 0.00
    0.0012791331 = product of:
      0.008953932 = sum of:
        0.008953932 = weight(_text_:information in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008953932 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Information Gateway