Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken"
  1. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.02
    0.01971747 = product of:
      0.069011144 = sum of:
        0.014471739 = weight(_text_:information in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014471739 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.054539405 = product of:
          0.0818091 = sum of:
            0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041089363 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
            0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040719736 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is an information retrieval protocol. It has generated much interest but is so far little deployed in UK systems and services. Gives a functional overview of the protocol itself and the standards background, describes some European initiatives which make use of it, and outlines various issues to do with its future use and acceptance. Z39.50 is a crucial building block of future distributed information systems but it needs to be considered alongside other protocols and services to provide useful applications
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:29:59
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  2. Jahns, Y.; Trummer, M.: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß : Kann Heterogenität beherrscht werden? (2004) 0.01
    0.014115498 = product of:
      0.04940424 = sum of:
        0.0025582663 = weight(_text_:information in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0025582663 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.03879095 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
        0.046845976 = weight(_text_:wirtschaft in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046845976 = score(doc=2789,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2144363 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.707926 = idf(docFreq=398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.21846104 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.707926 = idf(docFreq=398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    "... unter diesem Motto hat die Deutsche Bücherei Leipzig am 23. März 2004 auf dem Leipziger Kongress für Bibliothek und Information eine Vortragsreihe initiiert. Vorgestellt wurden Projekte, die sich im Spannungsfeld von Standardisierung und Heterogenität der Sacherschließung bewegen. Die Benutzer unserer Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen stehen heute einer Fülle von Informationen gegenüber, die sie aus zahlreichen Katalogen und Fachdatenbanken abfragen können. Diese Recherche kann schnell zeitraubend werden, wenn der Benutzer mit verschiedenen Suchbegriffen und -logiken arbeiten muss, um zur gewünschten Ressource zu gelangen. Ein Schlagwort A kann in jedem der durchsuchten Systeme eine andere Bedeutung annehmen. Homogenität erreicht man klassisch zunächst durch Normierung und Standardisierung. Für die zwei traditionellen Verfahren der inhaltlichen Erschließung - der klassifikatorischen und der verbalen - haben sich in Deutschland verschiedene Standards durchgesetzt. Klassifikatorische Erschließung wird mit ganz unterschiedlichen Systemen betrieben. Verbreitet sind etwa die Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) oder die Basisklassifikation (BK). Von Spezial- und Facheinrichtungen werden entsprechende Fachklassifikationen eingesetzt. Weltweit am häufigsten angewandt ist die Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), die seit 2003 ins Deutsche übertragen wird. Im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung haben sich, vor allem bei den wissenschaftlichen Universalbibliotheken, die Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) durchgesetzt, durch die zugleich die Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) kooperativ aufgebaut wurde. Daneben erschließen wiederum viele Spezial- und Facheinrichtungen mit selbst entwickelten Fachthesauri.
    Katja Heyke, Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, und Manfred Faden, Bibliothek des HWWA-Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung Hamburg, stellten ähnliche Entwicklungen für den Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften vor. Hier wird eine Crosskonkordanz zwischen dem Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) und dem Bereich Wirtschaft der SWD aufgebaut." Diese Datenbank soll den Zugriff auf die mit STW und SWD erschlossenen Bestände ermöglichen. Sie wird dazu weitergegeben an die virtuelle Fachbibliothek EconBiz und an den Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund. Die Crosskonkordanz Wirtschaft bietet aber auch die Chance zur kooperativen Sacherschließung, denn sie eröffnet die Möglichkeit der gegenseitigen Übernahme von Sacherschließungsdaten zwischen den Partnern Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, HWWA und Bibliothek des Instituts für Weltwirtschaft Kiel. Am Beispiel der Wirtschaftswissenschaften zeigt sich der Gewinn solcher KonkordanzProjekte für Indexierer und Benutzer. Der Austausch über die Erschließungsregeln und die systematische Analyse der Normdaten führen zur Bereinigung von fachlichen Schwachstellen und Inkonsistenzen in den Systemen. Die Thesauri werden insgesamt verbessert und sogar angenähert. Die Vortragsreihe schloss mit einem Projekt, das die Heterogenität der Daten aus dem Blickwinkel der Mehrsprachigkeit betrachtet. Martin Kunz, Deutsche Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main, informierte über das Projekt MACS (Multilingual Access to Subject Headings). MACS bietet einen mehrsprachigen Zugriff auf Bibliothekskataloge. Dazu wurde eine Verbindung zwischen den Schlagwortnormdateien LCSH, RAMEAU und SWD erarbeitet. Äquivalente Vorzugsbezeichnungen der Normdateien werden intellektuell nachgewiesen und als Link abgelegt. Das Projekt beschränkte sich zunächst auf die Bereiche Sport und Theater und widmet sich in einer nächsten Stufe den am häufigsten verwendeten Schlagwörtern. MACS geht davon aus, dass ein Benutzer in der Sprache seiner Wahl (Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch) eine Schlagwortsuche startet, und ermöglicht ihm, seine Suche auf die affilierten Datenbanken im Ausland auszudehnen. Martin Kunz plädierte für einen Integrationsansatz, der auf dem gegenseitigen Respekt vor der Terminologie der kooperierenden Partner beruht. Er sprach sich dafür aus, in solchen Vorhaben den Begriff der Thesaurus föderation anzuwenden, der die Autonomie der Thesauri unterstreicht.
  3. Arch-Int, N.; Sophatsathit, P.: ¬A semantic information gathering approach for heterogeneous information sources on WWW (2003) 0.01
    0.01346599 = product of:
      0.047130965 = sum of:
        0.026586283 = weight(_text_:information in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026586283 = score(doc=4694,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
        0.020544684 = product of:
          0.06163405 = sum of:
            0.06163405 = weight(_text_:29 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06163405 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.5, S.357-374
  4. Tappenbeck, I.; Wessel, C.: CARMEN : Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Net-working. Ein Halbzeitbericht (2001) 0.01
    0.01246505 = product of:
      0.043627676 = sum of:
        0.03677945 = weight(_text_:medien in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03677945 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17681947 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
        0.006848227 = product of:
          0.020544682 = sum of:
            0.020544682 = weight(_text_:29 in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020544682 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt CARMEN startete als Sonderfördermaßnahme im Rahmen von Global lnfo im Oktober 1999 mit einer geplanten Laufzeit von 29 Monaten. Der Schwerpunkt des Projekts liegt in der Weiterentwicklung von Konzepten und Verfahren der Dokumenterschließung, die den Zugriff auf heterogene, dezentral verteilte Informationsbestände und deren Verwaltung nach gemeinsamen Prinzipien ermöglichen sollen. Dabei geht CARMEN gezielt einen anderen Weg als die meisten bisherigen Ansätze in diesem Bereich, die versuchen, Homogenität und Konsistenz in einer dezentralen Informationslandschaft technikorientiert herzustellen, indem Verfahren entwickelt werden, durch die physikalisch auf verschiedene Dokumentenräume gleichzeitig zugegriffen werden kann. Eine rein technische Parallelisierung von Zugriffsmöglichkeiten reicht jedoch nicht aus, denn das Hauptproblem der inhaltlichen, strukturellen und konzeptionellen Differenz der einzelnen Datenbestände wird damit nicht gelöst. Um diese Differenzen zu kompensieren, werden Problemlösungen und Weiterentwicklungen innerhalb des Projekts CARMEN in drei Bereichen erarbeitet: (1) Metadaten (Dokumentbeschreibung, Retrieval, Verwaltung, Archivierung) (2) Methoden des Umgangs mit der verbleibenden Heterogenität der Datenbestände (3) Retrieval für strukturierte Dokumente mit Metadaten und heterogenen Datentypen. Diese drei Aufgabenbereiche hängen eng zusammen. Durch die Entwicklungen im Bereich der Metadaten soll einerseits die verlorengegangene Konsistenz partiell wiederhergestellt und auf eine den neuen Medien gerechte Basis gestellt werden. Andererseits sollen durch Verfahren zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung Dokumente mit unterschiedlicher Datenrelevanz und Inhaltserschließung aufeinander bezogen und retrievalseitig durch ein Rechercheverfahren erganzt werden, das den unterschiedlichen Datentypen gerecht wird Innerhalb des Gesamtprojekts CARMEN werden diese Aspekte arbeitsteilig behandelt. Acht Arbeitspakete (APs) befassen sich in Abstimmung miteinander mit je verschiedenen Schwerpunkten. Um die Koordination der Arbeiten der verschiedenen APs untereinander zu unterstützen, trafen sich die ca. 40 Projektbearbeiter am 1. und 2. Februar 2001 zum "CARMEN middle OfTheRoad Workshop" in Bonn. Anlässlich dieses Workshops wurden die inhaltlichen und technischen Ergebnisse, die in der ersten Hälfte der Projektlaufzeit von den einzelnen APs erzielt worden sind, in insgesamt 17 Präsentationen vorgestellt
  5. Tappenbeck, I.; Wessel, C.: CARMEN : Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Net-working. Bericht über den middleOfTheRoad Workshop (2001) 0.01
    0.01246505 = product of:
      0.043627676 = sum of:
        0.03677945 = weight(_text_:medien in 5901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03677945 = score(doc=5901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17681947 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 5901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5901)
        0.006848227 = product of:
          0.020544682 = sum of:
            0.020544682 = weight(_text_:29 in 5901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020544682 = score(doc=5901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt CARMEN startete als Sonderfördermaßnahme im Rahmen von Global lnfo im Oktober 1999 mit einer geplanten Laufzeit von 29 Monaten. Der Schwerpunkt des Projekts liegt in der Weiterentwicklung von Konzepten und Verfahren der Dokumenterschließung, die den Zugriff auf heterogene, dezentral verteilte Informationsbestände und deren Verwaltung nach gemeinsamen Prinzipien ermöglichen sollen. Dabei geht CARMEN gezielt einen anderen Weg als die meisten bisherigen Ansätze in diesem Bereich, die versuchen, Homogenität und Konsistenz in einer dezentralen Informationslandschaft technikorientiert herzustellen, indem Verfahren entwickelt werden, durch die physikalisch auf verschiedene Dokumentenräume gleichzeitig zugegriffen werden kann. Eine rein technische Parallelisierung von Zugriffsmöglichkeiten reicht jedoch nicht aus, denn das Hauptproblem der inhaltlichen, strukturellen und konzeptionellen Differenz der einzelnen Datenbestände wird damit nicht gelöst. Um diese Differenzen zu kompensieren, werden Problemlösungen und Weiterentwicklungen innerhalb des Projekts CARMEN in drei Bereichen erarbeitet: (1) Metadaten (Dokumentbeschreibung, Retrieval, Verwaltung, Archivierung) (2) Methoden des Umgangs mit der verbleibenden Heterogenität der Datenbestände (3) Retrieval für strukturierte Dokumente mit Metadaten und heterogenen Datentypen. Diese drei Aufgabenbereiche hängen eng zusammen. Durch die Entwicklungen im Bereich der Metadaten soll einerseits die verlorengegangene Konsistenz partiell wiederhergestellt und auf eine den neuen Medien gerechte Basis gestellt werden. Andererseits sollen durch Verfahren zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung Dokumente mit unterschiedlicher Datenrelevanz und Inhaltserschließung aufeinander bezogen und retrievalseitig durch ein Rechercheverfahren erganzt werden, das den unterschiedlichen Datentypen gerecht wird Innerhalb des Gesamtprojekts CARMEN werden diese Aspekte arbeitsteilig behandelt. Acht Arbeitspakete (APs) befassen sich in Abstimmung miteinander mit je verschiedenen Schwerpunkten. Um die Koordination der Arbeiten der verschiedenen APs untereinander zu unterstützen, trafen sich die ca. 40 Projektbearbeiter am 1. und 2. Februar 2001 zum "CARMEN middle OfTheRoad Workshop" in Bonn. Anlässlich dieses Workshops wurden die inhaltlichen und technischen Ergebnisse, die in der ersten Hälfte der Projektlaufzeit von den einzelnen APs erzielt worden sind, in insgesamt 17 Präsentationen vorgestellt
  6. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.01
    0.010202705 = product of:
      0.035709467 = sum of:
        0.015349597 = weight(_text_:information in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349597 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
        0.02035987 = product of:
          0.061079606 = sum of:
            0.061079606 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061079606 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  7. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01
    0.010161849 = product of:
      0.035566468 = sum of:
        0.023689877 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023689877 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.011876591 = product of:
          0.03562977 = sum of:
            0.03562977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03562977 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  8. Friedrich, M.; Schimkat, R.-D.; Küchlin, W.: Information retrieval in distributed environments based on context-aware, proactive documents (2002) 0.01
    0.009144572 = product of:
      0.032006 = sum of:
        0.0200216 = weight(_text_:information in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0200216 = score(doc=3608,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.011984399 = product of:
          0.035953194 = sum of:
            0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035953194 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this position paper we propose a document-centric middleware component called Living Documents to support context-aware information retrieval in distributed communities. A Living Document acts as a micro server for a document which contains computational services, a semi-structured knowledge repository to uniformly store and access context-related information, and finally the document's digital content. Our initial prototype of Living Documents is based an the concept of mobile agents and implemented in Java and XML.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  9. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01
    0.008942125 = product of:
      0.031297438 = sum of:
        0.01772419 = weight(_text_:information in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01772419 = score(doc=3173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
        0.013573246 = product of:
          0.040719736 = sum of:
            0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040719736 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the backgroud to the construction of a thesaurus at Hydro-Quebec, Quebec, Canada. Several information units, linked to form a network, share the same bibliographic database. The need for coherence and efficiency was the principle motive for the construction of the multidisciplinary thesaurus. Describes the construction process, discusses the specifity of the tool, its circulation, and considers its use on a partnership basis with other information services
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The development of an information tool at Hydro-Quebec: the HQ Thesaurus
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  10. Lopatenko, A.; Asserson, A.; Jeffery, K.G.: CERIF - Information retrieval of research information in a distributed heterogeneous environment (2002) 0.01
    0.008306195 = product of:
      0.029071681 = sum of:
        0.01879934 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01879934 = score(doc=3597,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
        0.010272342 = product of:
          0.030817024 = sum of:
            0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030817024 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    User demands to have access to complete and actual information about research may require integration of data from different CRISs. CRISs are rarely homogenous systems and problems of CRISs integration must be addressed from technological point of view. Implementation of CRIS providing access to heterogeneous data distributed among a number of CRISs is described. A few technologies - distributed databases, web services, semantic web are used for distributed CRIS to address different user requirements. Distributed databases serve to implement very efficient integration of homogenous systems, web services - to provide open access to research information, semantic web - to solve problems of integration semantically and structurally heterogeneous data sources and provide intelligent data retrieval interfaces. The problems of data completeness in distributed systems are addressed and CRIS-adequate solution for data completeness is suggested.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  11. Ostergren, M.; Wright, G.: Creating a bibliographic database for a widely distributed collection (1998) 0.01
    0.008048056 = product of:
      0.028168194 = sum of:
        0.014471739 = weight(_text_:information in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014471739 = score(doc=1503,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
        0.013696454 = product of:
          0.041089363 = sum of:
            0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041089363 = score(doc=1503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Managing information from over 375 separate parks is a challenge for the US National Parks Service (NPS). Describes the National Resource Bibliography Project initiated by the NPS, which so far includes more than 100.000 records from over 160 different US parks. The goal is to complete all of the units designated for the project by 1998. The result will be a virtual library comprising document collections from over 300 parks, forming a unique and valuable research tool, available to anyone interested
    Date
    23. 7.1998 19:29:54
    Source
    Information outlook. 2(1998) no.1, S.27-30
  12. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.0068998276 = product of:
      0.024149396 = sum of:
        0.015666116 = weight(_text_:information in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015666116 = score(doc=6959,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
        0.0084832795 = product of:
          0.025449837 = sum of:
            0.025449837 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025449837 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  13. Smith, N.A.: ONE, OPAC network in Europe : taking a further step towards a Europe-wide information network (1995) 0.01
    0.0068370057 = product of:
      0.02392952 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 8452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=8452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8452)
        0.013696454 = product of:
          0.041089363 = sum of:
            0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 8452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041089363 = score(doc=8452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 8452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8452)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Program. 29(1995) no.4, S.427-432
  14. Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997) 0.01
    0.0068018036 = product of:
      0.023806311 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
        0.013573246 = product of:
          0.040719736 = sum of:
            0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040719736 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:22:57
    Source
    New review of information networking. 1997, no.3, S.77-92
  15. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.01
    0.0068018036 = product of:
      0.023806311 = sum of:
        0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010233065 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.013573246 = product of:
          0.040719736 = sum of:
            0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040719736 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  16. Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001) 0.01
    0.0067065936 = product of:
      0.023473077 = sum of:
        0.0132931415 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0132931415 = score(doc=5589,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
        0.010179935 = product of:
          0.030539803 = sum of:
            0.030539803 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539803 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Der vollständige Projektname von Renardus lautet "Academic Subject Gateway Service Europe". Renardus wird von der Europäischen Union im 5. Rahmenprogramm mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Information Society Technologies" im zweiten Thematischen Programm "Benutzerfreundliche Informationsgesellschaft" ('Promoting a User-friendly Information Society') gefördert. Die Projektlaufzeit ist von Januar 2000 bis Juni 2002. Insgesamt zwölf Partner (Principal und Assistant Contractors) aus Finnland, Dänemark, Schweden, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden, Frankreich und Deutschland beteiligen sich an diesem Projekt. Die Europäische Union unterstützt das Projekt mit 1,7 Mio. EURO, die Gesamtkosten belaufen sich inklusive der Eigenbeteiligungen der Partner auf 2,3 Mio. EURO. Das Ziel des Projektes Renardus ist es, über eine Schnittstelle Zugriff auf verteilte Sammlungen von "High Quality" Internet Ressourcen in Europa zu ermöglichen. Diese Schnittstelle wird über den Renardus Broker realisiert, der das "Cross-Searchen" und "Cross-Browsen" über verteilte "Quality-Controlled Subject Gateways" ermöglicht. Ein weiteres Ziel von Renardus ist es, Möglichkeiten von "metadata sharing" zu evaluieren und in kleinen Experimenten zwischen z. B. Subject Gateways und Nationalbibliothek zu testen bzw. zu realisieren
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:32:15
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  17. Sarinder, K.K.S.; Lim, L.H.S.; Merican, A.F.; Dimyati, K.: Biodiversity information retrieval across networked data sets (2010) 0.01
    0.006043116 = product of:
      0.021150906 = sum of:
        0.009044836 = weight(_text_:information in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009044836 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
        0.01210607 = product of:
          0.03631821 = sum of:
            0.03631821 = weight(_text_:29 in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03631821 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Biodiversity resources are inevitably digital and stored in a wide variety of formats by researchers or stakeholders. In Malaysia, although digitizing biodiversity data has long been stressed, the interoperability of the biodiversity data is still an issue that requires attention. This is because, when data are shared, the question of copyright occurs, creating a setback among researchers wanting to promote or share data through online presentations. To solve this, the aim is to present an approach to integrate data through wrapping of datasets stored in relational databases located on networked platforms. Design/methodology/approach - The approach uses tools such as XML, PHP, ASP and HTML to integrate distributed databases in heterogeneous formats. Five current database integration systems were reviewed and all of them have common attributes such as query-oriented, using a mediator-based approach and integrating a structured data model. These common attributes were also adopted in the proposed solution. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval (DiGIR) was used as a model in designing the proposed solution. Findings - A new database integration system was developed, which is user-friendly and simple with common attributes found in current integration systems.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:29:10
  18. Vikor, D.L.; Gaumond, G.; Heath, F.M.: Building electronic cooperation in the 1990s : the Maryland, Georgia, and Texas experiences (1997) 0.01
    0.006036042 = product of:
      0.021126145 = sum of:
        0.010853804 = weight(_text_:information in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010853804 = score(doc=1680,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
        0.010272342 = product of:
          0.030817024 = sum of:
            0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030817024 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    During the 1990s statewide cooperative use of networks in the USA has moved towards providing mainly access to bibliographic and full-text resources not held locally and usually provided by commercial vendors for use by libraries. Describes 3 academic library networks: the University System of Maryland's Library Information Management System serving the information needs of users throughout the state; Georgia's GALILEO (Georgia Library Learning On-Line) which provides a set of electronic resources and services for the 34 colleges and universities of the University System of Georgia; and TexShare in which all 52 libraries from the public educational institutions in Texas participate. Although the development of funding sources, the technical implementations and support, and the management organization differ from state to state, all three reflect an incremental shift towards the electronic library
    Date
    29. 7.1998 19:42:59
  19. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01
    0.0060120015 = product of:
      0.021042004 = sum of:
        0.009044836 = weight(_text_:information in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009044836 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.011997169 = product of:
          0.035991505 = sum of:
            0.035991505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035991505 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Avrahami, T.T.; Yau, L.; Si, L.; Callan, J.P.: ¬The FedLemur project : Federated search in the real world (2006) 0.01
    0.0060096397 = product of:
      0.021033738 = sum of:
        0.010853804 = weight(_text_:information in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010853804 = score(doc=5271,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
        0.010179935 = product of:
          0.030539803 = sum of:
            0.030539803 = weight(_text_:22 in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539803 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037568163 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Federated search and distributed information retrieval systems provide a single user interface for searching multiple full-text search engines. They have been an active area of research for more than a decade, but in spite of their success as a research topic, they are still rare in operational environments. This article discusses a prototype federated search system developed for the U.S. government's FedStats Web portal, and the issues addressed in adapting research solutions to this operational environment. A series of experiments explore how well prior research results, parameter settings, and heuristics apply in the FedStats environment. The article concludes with a set of lessons learned from this technology transfer effort, including observations about search engine quality in the real world.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:02:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.347-358

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 27
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 73
  • el 9
  • m 4
  • x 4
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications