Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.23 
    0.22858559 = product of:
  0.5143176 = sum of:
    0.051431756 = product of:
      0.15429527 = sum of:
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15429527 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15429527 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15429527 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  2. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.21 
    0.20920034 = product of:
  0.47070077 = sum of:
    0.03428784 = product of:
      0.10286351 = sum of:
        0.10286351 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10286351 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14547098 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14547098 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.14547098 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14547098 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.14547098 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14547098 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  3. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.15 
    0.1523904 = product of:
  0.3428784 = sum of:
    0.03428784 = product of:
      0.10286351 = sum of:
        0.10286351 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10286351 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.10286351 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10286351 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.10286351 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10286351 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.10286351 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10286351 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  4. Information and communication technologies : international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010 (2010) 0.03 
    0.033881743 = product of:
  0.30493566 = sum of:
    0.30493566 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30493566 = score(doc=4784,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        1.4352381 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    RSWK
    Telekommunikationsnetz / Netzwerktopologie / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Informationstechnik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Informatik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Data Mining / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Subject
    Telekommunikationsnetz / Netzwerktopologie / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Informationstechnik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Informatik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
    Data Mining / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
  5. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010) 0.03 
    0.027057813 = product of:
  0.24352032 = sum of:
    0.24352032 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24352032 = score(doc=4706,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        1.146175 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
  6. Soergel, D.: SemWeb: Proposal for an Open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology : exploration and development of the concept (1996) 0.02 
    0.023096705 = product of:
  0.10393517 = sum of:
    0.06283286 = weight(_text_:open in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06283286 = score(doc=3576,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.43088073 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
    0.041102305 = weight(_text_:access in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041102305 = score(doc=3576,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.37448242 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a proposal for the long-range development of an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to many kinds of knowledge about concepts and terminology. The system would draw on existing knowledge bases that are accessible through the Internet or on CD-ROM an on a common integrated distributed knowledge base that would grow incrementally over time. Existing knowledge bases would be accessed through a common interface that would search several knowledge bases, collate the data into a common format, and present them to the user. The common integrated distributed knowledge base would provide an environment in which many contributors could carry out classification and terminological projects more efficiently, with the results available in a common format. Over time, data from other knowledge bases could be incorporated into the common knowledge base, either by actual transfer (provided the knowledge base producers are willing) or by reference through a link. Either way, such incorporation requires intellectual work but allows for tighter integration than common interface access to multiple knowledge bases. Each piece of information in the common knowledge base will have all its sources attached, providing an acknowledgment mechanism that gives due credit to all contributors. The whole system woul be designed to be usable by many levels of users for improved information exchange.
    Content
    Expanded version of a paper published in Advances in Knowledge Organization v.5 (1996): 165-173 (4th Annual ISKO Conference, Washington, D.C., 1996 July 15-18): SemWeb: proposal for an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology.
  7. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. (2010) 0.02 
    0.021646252 = product of:
  0.19481626 = sum of:
    0.19481626 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19481626 = score(doc=4707,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.91694003 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
  8. Developments in applied artificial intelligence : proceedings / 16th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE 2003, Loughborough, UK, June 23 - 26, 2003 (2003) 0.02 
    0.020958893 = product of:
  0.18863003 = sum of:
    0.18863003 = weight(_text_:kongress in 441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18863003 = score(doc=441,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.88782334 = fieldWeight in 441, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=441)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    RSWK
    Künstliche Intelligenz / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
    Soft Computing / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
    Expertensystem / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
    Subject
    Künstliche Intelligenz / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
    Soft Computing / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
    Expertensystem / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
  9. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.02 
    0.020535436 = product of:
  0.18481892 = sum of:
    0.18481892 = weight(_text_:kongress in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18481892 = score(doc=439,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.8698856 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
  10. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.02 
    0.019964311 = product of:
  0.0898394 = sum of:
    0.07960222 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07960222 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.43602353 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.010237177 = product of:
      0.03071153 = sum of:
        0.03071153 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03071153 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  11. Soergel, D.: SemWeb: proposal for an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology (1996) 0.02 
    0.019310767 = product of:
  0.086898446 = sum of:
    0.05130281 = weight(_text_:open in 3575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05130281 = score(doc=3575,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3518126 = fieldWeight in 3575, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3575)
    0.03559564 = weight(_text_:access in 3575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03559564 = score(doc=3575,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3243113 = fieldWeight in 3575, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3575)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Presents a proposal for the long-range development of an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to many kinds of knowledge about concepts and terminology. The system would draw on existing knowledge bases that are accessible through the Internet or on CD-ROM and on a common integrated distributed knowledge base that would grow incrementally over time. Existing knowledge bases would be accessed througha common interface that would search several knowledge bases, collate the data into a common format, and present them to the user. The common integrated distributed knowldge base would provide an environment in which many contributors could carry out classification and terminological projects more efficiently, with the results available in a common format. Over time, data from other knowledge bases could be incorporated into the common knowledge base, either by actual transfer (provided the knowledge base producers are willing) or by reference through a link. Either way, such incorporation requires intellectual work but allows for tighter integration than common interface access to multiple knowledge bases. Each piece of information in the common knowledge base will have all its sources attached, providing an acknowledgment mechanism that gives due credit to all contributors. The whole system would be designed to be usable by many levels of users for improved information exchange.
  12. Widhalm, R.; Mueck, T.A.: Merging topics in well-formed XML topic maps (2003) 0.02 
    0.019161059 = product of:
  0.086224765 = sum of:
    0.061563376 = weight(_text_:open in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061563376 = score(doc=2186,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.42217514 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
    0.024661385 = weight(_text_:access in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024661385 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Topic Maps are a standardized modelling approach for the semantic annotation and description of WWW resources. They enable an improved search and navigational access on information objects stored in semi-structured information spaces like the WWW. However, the according standards ISO 13250 and XTM (XML Topic Maps) lack formal semantics, several questions concerning e.g. subclassing, inheritance or merging of topics are left open. The proposed TMUML meta model, directly derived from the well known UML meta model, is a meta model for Topic Maps which enables semantic constraints to be formulated in OCL (object constraint language) in order to answer such open questions and overcome possible inconsistencies in Topic Map repositories. We will examine the XTM merging conditions and show, in several examples, how the TMUML meta model enables semantic constraints for Topic Map merging to be formulated in OCL. Finally, we will show how the TM validation process, i.e., checking if a Topic Map is well formed, includes our merging conditions.
  13. Waard, A. de; Fluit, C.; Harmelen, F. van: Drug Ontology Project for Elsevier (DOPE) (2007) 0.02 
    0.018069804 = product of:
  0.08131412 = sum of:
    0.04104225 = weight(_text_:open in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04104225 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.2814501 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.04027187 = weight(_text_:access in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04027187 = score(doc=758,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.36691633 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Innovative research institutes rely on the availability of complete and accurate information about new research and development, and it is the business of information providers such as Elsevier to provide the required information in a cost-effective way. It is very likely that the semantic web will make an important contribution to this effort, since it facilitates access to an unprecedented quantity of data. However, with the unremitting growth of scientific information, integrating access to all this information remains a significant problem, not least because of the heterogeneity of the information sources involved - sources which may use different syntactic standards (syntactic heterogeneity), organize information in very different ways (structural heterogeneity) and even use different terminologies to refer to the same information (semantic heterogeneity). The ability to address these different kinds of heterogeneity is the key to integrated access. Thesauri have already proven to be a core technology to effective information access as they provide controlled vocabularies for indexing information, and thereby help to overcome some of the problems of free-text search by relating and grouping relevant terms in a specific domain. However, currently there is no open architecture which supports the use of these thesauri for querying other data sources. For example, when we move from the centralized and controlled use of EMTREE within EMBASE.com to a distributed setting, it becomes crucial to improve access to the thesaurus by means of a standardized representation using open data standards that allow for semantic qualifications. In general, mental models and keywords for accessing data diverge between subject areas and communities, and so many different ontologies have been developed. An ideal architecture must therefore support the disclosure of distributed and heterogeneous data sources through different ontologies. The aim of the DOPE project (Drug Ontology Project for Elsevier) is to investigate the possibility of providing access to multiple information sources in the area of life science through a single interface.
  14. Auer, S.; Oelen, A.; Haris, A.M.; Stocker, M.; D'Souza, J.; Farfar, K.E.; Vogt, L.; Prinz, M.; Wiens, V.; Jaradeh, M.Y.: Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.02 
    0.01785923 = product of:
  0.08036653 = sum of:
    0.05130281 = weight(_text_:open in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05130281 = score(doc=316,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3518126 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
    0.02906372 = weight(_text_:access in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02906372 = score(doc=316,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The transfer of knowledge has not changed fundamentally for many hundreds of years: It is usually document-based-formerly printed on paper as a classic essay and nowadays as PDF. With around 2.5 million new research contributions every year, researchers drown in a flood of pseudo-digitized PDF publications. As a result research is seriously weakened. In this article, we argue for representing scholarly contributions in a structured and semantic way as a knowledge graph. The advantage is that information represented in a knowledge graph is readable by machines and humans. As an example, we give an overview on the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), a service implementing this approach. For creating the knowledge graph representation, we rely on a mixture of manual (crowd/expert sourcing) and (semi-)automated techniques. Only with such a combination of human and machine intelligence, we can achieve the required quality of the representation to allow for novel exploration and assistance services for researchers. As a result, a scholarly knowledge graph such as the ORKG can be used to give a condensed overview on the state-of-the-art addressing a particular research quest, for example as a tabular comparison of contributions according to various characteristics of the approaches. Further possible intuitive access interfaces to such scholarly knowledge graphs include domain-specific (chart) visualizations or answering of natural language questions.
    Object
    Open Research Knowledge Graph
  15. Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010) 0.02 
    0.017112266 = product of:
  0.0770052 = sum of:
    0.06823048 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06823048 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.37373447 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
    0.008774723 = product of:
      0.026324168 = sum of:
        0.026324168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026324168 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Semenova, E.: Ontologie als Begriffssystem : Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen (2010) 0.02 
    0.017112266 = product of:
  0.0770052 = sum of:
    0.06823048 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06823048 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.37373447 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
    0.008774723 = product of:
      0.026324168 = sum of:
        0.026324168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026324168 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  17. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.02 
    0.017097129 = product of:
  0.07693708 = sum of:
    0.07108726 = weight(_text_:open in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07108726 = score(doc=179,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.48748586 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
    0.0058498154 = product of:
      0.017549446 = sum of:
        0.017549446 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017549446 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017) 0.02 
    0.015967548 = product of:
  0.071853966 = sum of:
    0.05130281 = weight(_text_:open in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05130281 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3518126 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
    0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020551153 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    This volume contains the lecture notes of the 13th Reasoning Web Summer School, RW 2017, held in London, UK, in July 2017. In 2017, the theme of the school was "Semantic Interoperability on the Web", which encompasses subjects such as data integration, open data management, reasoning over linked data, database to ontology mapping, query answering over ontologies, hybrid reasoning with rules and ontologies, and ontology-based dynamic systems. The papers of this volume focus on these topics and also address foundational reasoning techniques used in answer set programming and ontologies.
    Content
    Neumaier, Sebastian (et al.): Data Integration for Open Data on the Web - Stamou, Giorgos (et al.): Ontological Query Answering over Semantic Data - Calì, Andrea: Ontology Querying: Datalog Strikes Back - Sequeda, Juan F.: Integrating Relational Databases with the Semantic Web: A Reflection - Rousset, Marie-Christine (et al.): Datalog Revisited for Reasoning in Linked Data - Kaminski, Roland (et al.): A Tutorial on Hybrid Answer Set Solving with clingo - Eiter, Thomas (et al.): Answer Set Programming with External Source Access - Lukasiewicz, Thomas: Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web - Calvanese, Diego (et al.): OBDA for Log Extraction in Process Mining
  19. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.02 
    0.015498253 = product of:
  0.069742136 = sum of:
    0.058042504 = weight(_text_:open in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058042504 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.39803052 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
    0.011699631 = product of:
      0.03509889 = sum of:
        0.03509889 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03509889 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
    Source
    Open Password. 2021, Nr.925 vom 21.05.2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzI5NSwiZDdlZGY4MTk0NWJhIiwwLDAsMjY1LDFd]
  20. Soergel, D.: Towards a relation ontology for the Semantic Web (2011) 0.02 
    0.015154057 = product of:
  0.06819326 = sum of:
    0.043531876 = weight(_text_:open in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043531876 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
    0.024661385 = weight(_text_:access in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024661385 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web consists of data structured for use by computer programs, such as data sets made available under the Linked Open Data initiative. Much of this data is structured following the entity-relationship model encoded in RDF for syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, the semantics of the relationships used in any given dataset needs to be made explicit. Ultimately this requires an inventory of these relationships structured around a relation ontology. This talk will outline a blueprint for such an inventory, including a format for the description/definition of binary and n-ary relations, drawing on ideas put forth in the classification and thesaurus community over the last 60 years, upper level ontologies, systems like FrameNet, the Buffalo Relation Ontology, and an analysis of linked data sets.
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 116
  • d 22
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 100
  • el 36
  • m 12
  • s 8
  • x 8
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications