Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jansen, B.J."
  1. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching : public searching of the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.0059700916 = product of:
      0.017910274 = sum of:
        0.017910274 = product of:
          0.05373082 = sum of:
            0.05373082 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05373082 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2719282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Den Autoren wurden von den kommerziellen Suchmaschinen AltaVista, Excite und All the Web größere Datenbestände zur Verfügung gestellt. Die ausgewerteten Files umfassten jeweils alle an die jeweilige Suchmaschine an einem bestimmten Tag gestellten Anfragen. Die Daten wurden zwischen 199'] und 2002 erhoben; allerdings liegen nicht von allen Jahren Daten von allen Suchmaschinen vor, so dass einige der festgestellten Unterschiede im Nutzerverhalten sich wohl auf die unterschiedlichen Nutzergruppen der einzelnen Suchmaschinen zurückführen lassen. In einem Fall werden die Nutzergruppen sogar explizit nach den Suchmaschinen getrennt, so dass das Nutzerverhalten der europäischen Nutzer der Suchmaschine All the Web mit dem Verhalten der US-amerikanischen Nutzer verglichen wird. Die Analyse der Logfiles erfolgt auf unterschiedlichen Ebenen: Es werden sowohl die eingegebenen Suchbegriffe, die kompletten Suchanfragen, die Such-Sessions und die Anzahl der angesehenen Ergebnisseiten ermittelt. Bei den Suchbegriffen ist besonders interessant, dass die Spannbreite der Informationsbedürfnisse im Lauf der Jahre deutlich zugenommen hat. Zwar werden 20 Prozent aller eingegebenen Suchbegriffe regelmäßig verwendet, zehn Prozent kamen hingegen nur ein einziges Mal vor. Die thematischen Interessen der Suchmaschinen-Nutzer haben sich im Lauf der letzten Jahre ebenfalls gewandelt. Während in den Anfangsjahren viele Anfragen aus den beiden Themenfeldern Sex und Technologie stammten, gehen diese mittlerweile zurück. Dafür nehmen Anfragen im Bereich E-Commerce zu. Weiterhin zugenommen haben nicht-englischsprachige Begriffe sowie Zahlen und Akronyme. Die Popularität von Suchbegriffen ist auch saisonabhängig und wird durch aktuelle Nachrichten beeinflusst. Auf der Ebene der Suchanfragen zeigt sich weiterhin die vielfach belegte Tatsache, dass Suchanfragen in Web-Suchmaschinen extrem kurz sind. Die durchschnittliche Suchanfrage enthält je nach Suchmaschine zwischen 2,3 und 2,9 Terme. Dies deckt sich mit anderen Untersuchungen zu diesem Thema. Die Länge der Suchanfragen ist in den letzten Jahren leicht steigend; größere Sprünge hin zu längeren Anfragen sind jedoch nicht zu erwarten. Ebenso verhält es sich mit dem Einsatz von Operatoren: Nur etwa in jeder zehnten Anfrage kommen diese vor, wobei die Phrasensuche am häufigsten verwendet wird. Dass die SuchmaschinenNutzer noch weitgehend als Anfänger angesehen werden müssen, zeigt sich auch daran, dass sie pro Suchanfrage nur drei oder vier Dokumente aus der Trefferliste tatsächlich sichten.
  2. Reddy, M.C.; Jansen, B.J.: ¬A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context : a study of two healthcare teams (2008) 0.01
    0.00538952 = product of:
      0.016168559 = sum of:
        0.016168559 = product of:
          0.032337118 = sum of:
            0.032337118 = weight(_text_:28 in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032337118 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2008 15:46:24
  3. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching (2009) 0.01
    0.00538952 = product of:
      0.016168559 = sum of:
        0.016168559 = product of:
          0.032337118 = sum of:
            0.032337118 = weight(_text_:28 in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032337118 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Query reformulation is a key user behavior during Web search. Our research goal is to develop predictive models of query reformulation during Web searching. This article reports results from a study in which we automatically classified the query-reformulation patterns for 964,780 Web searching sessions, composed of 1,523,072 queries, to predict the next query reformulation. We employed an n-gram modeling approach to describe the probability of users transitioning from one query-reformulation state to another to predict their next state. We developed first-, second-, third-, and fourth-order models and evaluated each model for accuracy of prediction, coverage of the dataset, and complexity of the possible pattern set. The results show that Reformulation and Assistance account for approximately 45% of all query reformulations; furthermore, the results demonstrate that the first- and second-order models provide the best predictability, between 28 and 40% overall and higher than 70% for some patterns. Implications are that the n-gram approach can be used for improving searching systems and searching assistance.
  4. Jansen, B.J.; Rieh, S.Y.: ¬The seventeen theoretical constructs of information searching and information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.00538952 = product of:
      0.016168559 = sum of:
        0.016168559 = product of:
          0.032337118 = sum of:
            0.032337118 = weight(_text_:28 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032337118 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2010 19:28:49
  5. Koshman, S.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching on the Vivisimo search engine (2006) 0.00
    0.004491267 = product of:
      0.013473799 = sum of:
        0.013473799 = product of:
          0.026947599 = sum of:
            0.026947599 = weight(_text_:28 in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026947599 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The application of clustering to Web search engine technology is a novel approach that offers structure to the information deluge often faced by Web searchers. Clustering methods have been well studied in research labs; however, real user searching with clustering systems in operational Web environments is not well understood. This article reports on results from a transaction log analysis of Vivisimo.com, which is a Web meta-search engine that dynamically clusters users' search results. A transaction log analysis was conducted on 2-week's worth of data collected from March 28 to April 4 and April 25 to May 2, 2004, representing 100% of site traffic during these periods and 2,029,734 queries overall. The results show that the highest percentage of queries contained two terms. The highest percentage of search sessions contained one query and was less than 1 minute in duration. Almost half of user interactions with clusters consisted of displaying a cluster's result set, and a small percentage of interactions showed cluster tree expansion. Findings show that 11.1% of search sessions were multitasking searches, and there are a broad variety of search topics in multitasking search sessions. Other searching interactions and statistics on repeat users of the search engine are reported. These results provide insights into search characteristics with a cluster-based Web search engine and extend research into Web searching trends.
  6. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: ¬An analysis of Web searching by European Allthe Web.com users (2005) 0.00
    0.004491267 = product of:
      0.013473799 = sum of:
        0.013473799 = product of:
          0.026947599 = sum of:
            0.026947599 = weight(_text_:28 in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026947599 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become a worldwide source of information and a mainstream business tool. It is changing the way people conduct the daily business of their lives. As these changes are occurring, we need to understand what Web searching trends are emerging within the various global regions. What are the regional differences and trends in Web searching, if any? What is the effectiveness of Web search engines as providers of information? As part of a body of research studying these questions, we have analyzed two data sets collected from queries by mainly European users submitted to AlltheWeb.com on 6 February 2001 and 28 May 2002. AlltheWeb.com is a major and highly rated European search engine. Each data set contains approximately a million queries submitted by over 200,000 users and spans a 24-h period. This longitudinal benchmark study shows that European Web searching is evolving in certain directions. There was some decline in query length, with extremely simple queries. European search topics are broadening, with a notable percentage decline in sexual and pornographic searching. The majority of Web searchers view fewer than five Web documents, spending only seconds on a Web document. Approximately 50% of the Web documents viewed by these European users were topically relevant. We discuss the implications for Web information systems and information content providers.
  7. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Pedersen, J.: ¬A temporal comparison of AItaVista Web searching (2005) 0.00
    0.003464641 = product of:
      0.010393923 = sum of:
        0.010393923 = product of:
          0.03118177 = sum of:
            0.03118177 = weight(_text_:29 in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03118177 = score(doc=3454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1337172 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 19:29:59
  8. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.00
    0.0034334743 = product of:
      0.010300423 = sum of:
        0.010300423 = product of:
          0.030901268 = sum of:
            0.030901268 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030901268 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1331144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  9. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Koshman, S.: Web searcher interaction with the Dogpile.com metasearch engine (2007) 0.00
    0.0028872013 = product of:
      0.008661604 = sum of:
        0.008661604 = product of:
          0.025984809 = sum of:
            0.025984809 = weight(_text_:29 in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025984809 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1337172 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2007 21:12:02