Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Broughton, V."
  1. Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002) 0.00
    0.0034762803 = product of:
      0.027810242 = sum of:
        0.027810242 = product of:
          0.08343072 = sum of:
            0.08343072 = weight(_text_:29 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08343072 = score(doc=3784,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2005 12:27:29
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.29-35
  2. Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61
  3. Broughton, V.: Organizing a national humanities portal : a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources (2002) 0.00
    0.0021069439 = product of:
      0.01685555 = sum of:
        0.01685555 = product of:
          0.05056665 = sum of:
            0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05056665 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:14:57
  4. Broughton, V.: ¬The development of a common auxiliary schedule of property : a preliminary survey and proposal for its development (1998) 0.00
    0.0021069439 = product of:
      0.01685555 = sum of:
        0.01685555 = product of:
          0.05056665 = sum of:
            0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05056665 = score(doc=6410,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 20(1998), S.27-29
  5. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00
    0.0020879905 = product of:
      0.016703924 = sum of:
        0.016703924 = product of:
          0.05011177 = sum of:
            0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05011177 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  6. Broughton, V.: ¬The respective roles of intellectual creativity and automation in representing diversity : human and machine generated bias (2019) 0.00
    0.0018075579 = product of:
      0.014460463 = sum of:
        0.014460463 = product of:
          0.04338139 = sum of:
            0.04338139 = weight(_text_:problem in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04338139 = score(doc=5728,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.33160037 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The paper traces the development of the discussion around ethical issues in artificial intelligence, and considers the way in which humans have affected the knowledge bases used in machine learning. The phenomenon of bias or discrimination in machine ethics is seen as inherited from humans, either through the use of biased data or through the semantics inherent in intellectually- built tools sourced by intelligent agents. The kind of biases observed in AI are compared with those identified in the field of knowledge organization, using religious adherents as an example of a community potentially marginalized by bias. A practical demonstration is given of apparent religious prejudice inherited from source material in a large database deployed widely in computational linguistics and automatic indexing. Methods to address the problem of bias are discussed, including the modelling of the moral process on neuroscientific understanding of brain function. The question is posed whether it is possible to model religious belief in a similar way, so that robots of the future may have both an ethical and a religious sense and themselves address the problem of prejudice.
  7. Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a fundamental theory for structuring subject organization tools (2007) 0.00
    0.0014046291 = product of:
      0.011237033 = sum of:
        0.011237033 = product of:
          0.033711098 = sum of:
            0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033711098 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:21:29
  8. Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000) 0.00
    0.0012781365 = product of:
      0.010225092 = sum of:
        0.010225092 = product of:
          0.030675275 = sum of:
            0.030675275 = weight(_text_:problem in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030675275 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
  9. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.00
    0.0012179945 = product of:
      0.009743956 = sum of:
        0.009743956 = product of:
          0.029231867 = sum of:
            0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029231867 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  10. Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008) 0.00
    0.0010534719 = product of:
      0.008427775 = sum of:
        0.008427775 = product of:
          0.025283325 = sum of:
            0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025283325 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2008 19:11:29
  11. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.00
    0.0010439953 = product of:
      0.008351962 = sum of:
        0.008351962 = product of:
          0.025055885 = sum of:
            0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025055885 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000) 0.00
    0.0010225092 = product of:
      0.008180073 = sum of:
        0.008180073 = product of:
          0.02454022 = sum of:
            0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02454022 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
  13. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.00
    8.7789324E-4 = product of:
      0.007023146 = sum of:
        0.007023146 = product of:
          0.021069437 = sum of:
            0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021069437 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2014 17:31:49