Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.31
    0.3112286 = product of:
      0.49796578 = sum of:
        0.0489538 = product of:
          0.1468614 = sum of:
            0.1468614 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1468614 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1468614 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1468614 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1468614 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.008427775 = product of:
          0.025283325 = sum of:
            0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025283325 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.00
    0.004296265 = product of:
      0.01718506 = sum of:
        0.010225092 = product of:
          0.030675275 = sum of:
            0.030675275 = weight(_text_:problem in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030675275 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0069599687 = product of:
          0.020879906 = sum of:
            0.020879906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020879906 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die September/Oktober-Ausgabe 2009 der IWP ist eine Schwerpunktausgabe zum Records Management. Es ist interessant, dass einmal aus fachlich ganz anderer Perspektive auf diese Management- Disziplin geschaut wird. Viele Aspekte werden angesprochen: Terminologie, Rolle des Archivwesens, Interdisziplinarität, Langzeitaufbewahrung und Standardisierung. Im Artikel "Wissensorganisation und Records Management. Was ist der 'state of the art'?" steht die Wissensorganisation als Schwachstelle des Records Management zentral. Dies zu Recht: Das logische Datenmodell von DOMEA - das Gleiche gilt für GEVER und ELAK - entspricht beispielsweise nicht in allen Hinsichten der Geschäftsrealität. Daraus entstehen für die Mitarbeitenden im Arbeitsalltag öfters mehr Verständnisprobleme als sie bewältigen können oder wollen. Die systemische Unterstützung der eingesetzten EDRMS (nicht alle Produkte verdienen übrigens diesen Namen) wird dadurch geschwächt. Die Wissensorganisation genügt in vielen Fällen (noch) nicht. Das Problem liegt allerdings weniger bei der Klassifikation (Aktenplan), wie Ulrike Spree meint. Auch hier kommen Anomalien vor. Ein Ordnungssystem im Records Management umfasst mehr als nur die Klassifikation. Zudem dürfen die prinzipiellen, inhärenten Unterschiede zwischen Records Management einerseits und Wissens- und Informationsmanagement andererseits nicht vergessen gehen. Nicht die Klassifikation ist beim Records Management das zentrale Werkzeug der Informationsrepräsentation und -organisation, sondern die saubere Dossierbildung und die stringente, strukturstabile Umsetzung davon im Datenmodell. Hierauf geht die Autorin nicht ein. Ich werde aus dieser Sicht auf ihren Beitrag in der Schwerpunktausgabe reagieren.
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
  3. Wandeler, J.: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof? : Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (2003) 0.00
    0.003437012 = product of:
      0.013748048 = sum of:
        0.008180073 = product of:
          0.02454022 = sum of:
            0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02454022 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005567975 = product of:
          0.016703924 = sum of:
            0.016703924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016703924 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das Hauptthema dieser Tagung - Multimedia - beschäftigt sich mit der Vielfalt der Medien und Quellen, mit denen wir es heute zu tun haben. Da liegt es nahe, sich auch mit einer anderen Form der Vielfalt, dem Thema Mehrsprachigkeit zu beschäftigen. Und die Veranstalter dieser Tagung waren der Meinung, dass ein Schweizer dazu mit Sicherheit etwas zu sagen habe. Das ist insofern richtig, als wir in einem mehrsprachigen Land leben und mit diesem Problem im Alltag vertraut sind, sowohl im täglichen Leben, wie auch eben im dokumentarischen Alltag. Aus dieser praktischen Sicht und nicht als Sprachwissenschafter, der ich nicht bin, möchte ich mich dem Thema nähern. Die Vielfalt der deutschen Sprache: Wenn die Schweiz ein mehrsprachiges Land ist - ist dann Deutschland im Gegensatz dazu ein einsprachiges Land? Auf den ersten Blick sicher ja - in Deutschland spricht man deutsch - aber die Sache ist doch nicht so einfach. Natürlich leben auch hier, wie überall, Menschen aus anderen Ländern mit anderen Muttersprachen - in dieser Optik gibt es wohl fast nur mehrsprachige Länder. Aber auch wenn wir nur die einheimische Bevölkerung mit deutschem Pass betrachten, ist die Sache nicht so eindeutig. Zwar haben sie das Deutsche als gemeinsame Sprache, die von allen gesprochen und verstanden wird. Aber die eigentliche Muttersprache der Deutschen oder mindestens einer grossen Mehrheit ist nicht das Hochdeutsche, sondern einer der vielen Dialekte. Diese Dialekte sind ja höchst unterschiedlich und einem Bayern oder Schwaben geht es sicher nicht anders, als es mir vor Jahren ergangen ist, als ich in Norddeutschland erstmals plattdeutsch sprechen hörte: ich hab nicht mal mehr Bahnhof verstanden und benötigte einige Wochen, bis ich der Unterhaltung wenigstens in groben Zügen folgen konnte. Das Hochdeutsche ist da der gemeinsame Nenner und ermöglichst erst die Verständigung, auch wenn es mit vielfältigen Akzenten und regional eingefärbtem Vokabular gesprochen wird. In diesem Sinne ist die Situation nicht anders als in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz, wo auch ganz unterschiedliche Dialekte gesprochen werden. Allerdings gibt es doch einen wichtigen Unterschied: Hier in Deutschland ist Hochdeutsch die allgemeine Umgangssprache sowohl in der mündlichen wie in der schriftlichen Kommunikation. Dialekte werden im privaten Bereich gesprochen, aber im öffentlichen Bereich, im Geschäftsleben, in der Wissenschaft etc. ist Hochdeutsch die Umgangssprache.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:09:10
  4. Electronic systems and records management in the information ages (1997) 0.00
    0.0028092582 = product of:
      0.022474065 = sum of:
        0.022474065 = product of:
          0.067422196 = sum of:
            0.067422196 = weight(_text_:29 in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067422196 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.7-29
  5. Chin, A.G.: Text databases and document management : theory and practice (2001) 0.00
    0.0028092582 = product of:
      0.022474065 = sum of:
        0.022474065 = product of:
          0.067422196 = sum of:
            0.067422196 = weight(_text_:29 in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067422196 = score(doc=4687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:06:29
  6. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.00
    0.0027839874 = product of:
      0.0222719 = sum of:
        0.0222719 = product of:
          0.0668157 = sum of:
            0.0668157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0668157 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  7. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 10:05:39
  8. Robek, M.F.; Brown, G.F.; Stephens, D.O.: Information and records management (1995) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=4237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4237)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.64-65 (A.L. Dmytrenko)
  9. Smith, C.D.: Implementation of imaging technology for recordkeeping at the World Bank (1997) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.25-29
  10. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.00
    0.002435989 = product of:
      0.019487912 = sum of:
        0.019487912 = product of:
          0.058463734 = sum of:
            0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058463734 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  11. Smith, C.: Building an Internet archive system for the British Broadcasting Corporation (2005) 0.00
    0.0021690698 = product of:
      0.017352559 = sum of:
        0.017352559 = product of:
          0.052057672 = sum of:
            0.052057672 = weight(_text_:problem in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052057672 = score(doc=5593,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.39792046 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The amount of digital content produced at academic research institutions is large, and libraries and archives at these institutions have a responsibility to bring this digital material under curatorial control in order to manage and preserve it over time. But this is a daunting task with few proven models, requiring new technology, policies, procedures, core staff competencies, and cost models. The MIT Libraries are working with the DSpace(TM) open-source digital repository platform to explore the problem of capturing research and teaching material in any digital format and preserving it over time. By collaborating on this problem with other research institutions using the DSpace platform in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and other parts of the world, as well as with other important efforts in the digital preservation arena, we are beginning to see ways of managing arbitrary digital content that might make digital preservation an achievable goal.
  12. Helfrich, M.: ¬Das digitale Archiv (1998) 0.00
    0.0021069439 = product of:
      0.01685555 = sum of:
        0.01685555 = product of:
          0.05056665 = sum of:
            0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05056665 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    7. 8.1998 17:46:29
  13. Bantin, P.: Electronic records management : a review of the work of a decade and a reflection on future directions (2002) 0.00
    0.0021069439 = product of:
      0.01685555 = sum of:
        0.01685555 = product of:
          0.05056665 = sum of:
            0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05056665 = score(doc=4255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    23.10.2005 13:44:29
  14. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.00
    0.0020879905 = product of:
      0.016703924 = sum of:
        0.016703924 = product of:
          0.05011177 = sum of:
            0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05011177 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  15. Cory, K.A.: ¬The imaging industry wants us! (1992) 0.00
    0.001789391 = product of:
      0.014315128 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Paper-based manual filing systems are inadequate to handle the flood of information found in most commercial offices and government agencies. Examples are included to delineate the dimensions of the problem. In response, imaging technology, which converts information in paper format to computer-readable binary format, is creating a multitude of electronic databases. However, imaging vendors are minimizing the difficulties of database organization. The author, drawing on personal experience, recounts instances of inadequate database organization. Because classification and indexing principles are only imparted in schools of library and/or information science, the imaging industry is highly dependent upon expertise possessed by library science graduates. In order to take advantage of this new job market, recommendations for library science students and faculty are included.
  16. Montana, J.C.: It can make you or break you : the importance of records management in ligitation (1995) 0.00
    0.0017557865 = product of:
      0.014046292 = sum of:
        0.014046292 = product of:
          0.042138875 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.1, S.3-8
  17. Pemberton, J.M.: Who put the 'management' in records management? (1995) 0.00
    0.0017557865 = product of:
      0.014046292 = sum of:
        0.014046292 = product of:
          0.042138875 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.68-73
  18. Fox, M.J.; Wilkerson, P.L.; Warren, S.R.: Introduction to archival organization and description (1999) 0.00
    0.0017557865 = product of:
      0.014046292 = sum of:
        0.014046292 = product of:
          0.042138875 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 3126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=3126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3126)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:07:29
  19. Ehrmann, S.: ¬Die Nadel im Bytehaufen : Finden statt suchen: Text Retrieval, Multimediadatenbanken, Dokumentenmanagement (2000) 0.00
    0.0017557865 = product of:
      0.014046292 = sum of:
        0.014046292 = product of:
          0.042138875 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2009 11:10:42
  20. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.00
    0.0017399922 = product of:
      0.013919937 = sum of:
        0.013919937 = product of:
          0.04175981 = sum of:
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 17
  • f 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 45
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…