Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995) 0.00
    0.0028920928 = product of:
      0.023136742 = sum of:
        0.023136742 = product of:
          0.06941023 = sum of:
            0.06941023 = weight(_text_:problem in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941023 = score(doc=3833,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5305606 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents results of an experiment in which 8 indexers (4 beginners and 4 experts) were asked to index the same 4 documents with 2 different thesauri. The 3 kind of verbal reports provide complementary data on strategic behaviour. it is of prime importance to consider the indexing task as an ill-defined problem, where the solutionm is partly defined by the indexer
  2. David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995) 0.00
    0.0026565571 = product of:
      0.021252457 = sum of:
        0.021252457 = product of:
          0.06375737 = sum of:
            0.06375737 = weight(_text_:problem in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06375737 = score(doc=3609,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.48735106 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Indexers differ in their judgement as to which terms reflect adequately the content of a document. Studies of interindexers' consistency identified several factors associated with low consistency, but failed to provide a comprehensive model of this phenomenon. Our research applies theories and methods from cognitive psychology to the study of indexing behavior. From a theoretical standpoint, indexing is considered as a problem solving situation. To access to the cognitive processes of indexers, 3 kinds of verbal reports are used. We will present results of an experiment in which 4 experienced indexers indexed the same documents. It will be shown that the 3 kinds of verbal reports provide complementary data on strategic behavior, and that it is of prime importance to consider the indexing task as an ill-defined problem, where the solution is partly defined by the indexer him(her)self
  3. Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997) 0.00
    0.001789391 = product of:
      0.014315128 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic keyword extraction is an important and fundamental technology in an advanced information retrieval systems. Briefly compares several major keyword extraction methods, lists their advantages and disadvantages, and reports recent research progress in Taiwan. Also describes the application of a keyword extraction algorithm in an information retrieval system for relevance feedback. Preliminary analysis shows that the error rate of extracting relevant keywords is 18%, and that the precision rate is over 50%. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the extraction results depend on the retrieval results, which in turn depend on the data held by the database. Apart from collecting more data, this problem can be alleviated by the application of a thesaurus constructed by the same keyword extraction algorithm
  4. Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998) 0.00
    0.0014046291 = product of:
      0.011237033 = sum of:
        0.011237033 = product of:
          0.033711098 = sum of:
            0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033711098 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    4. 1.1999 19:31:29
  5. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00
    0.0013919937 = product of:
      0.01113595 = sum of:
        0.01113595 = product of:
          0.03340785 = sum of:
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  6. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00
    0.0012179945 = product of:
      0.009743956 = sum of:
        0.009743956 = product of:
          0.029231867 = sum of:
            0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029231867 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  7. Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998) 0.00
    0.0010534719 = product of:
      0.008427775 = sum of:
        0.008427775 = product of:
          0.025283325 = sum of:
            0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025283325 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    24. 2.1999 21:29:51
  8. Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990) 0.00
    8.7789324E-4 = product of:
      0.007023146 = sum of:
        0.007023146 = product of:
          0.021069437 = sum of:
            0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021069437 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    23.11.1995 11:29:46