-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.01
0.0074971514 = product of:
0.029988606 = sum of:
0.02024465 = product of:
0.06073395 = sum of:
0.06073395 = weight(_text_:problem in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073395 = score(doc=3383,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.009743956 = product of:
0.029231867 = sum of:
0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029231867 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.01
0.0055932454 = product of:
0.044745963 = sum of:
0.044745963 = product of:
0.06711894 = sum of:
0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033711098 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03340785 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.01
0.005155518 = product of:
0.020622073 = sum of:
0.012270111 = product of:
0.03681033 = sum of:
0.03681033 = weight(_text_:problem in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03681033 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008351962 = product of:
0.025055885 = sum of:
0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025055885 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.00
0.00489409 = product of:
0.03915272 = sum of:
0.03915272 = product of:
0.05872908 = sum of:
0.029497212 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029497212 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029231867 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.00
0.0034496475 = product of:
0.01379859 = sum of:
0.008180073 = product of:
0.02454022 = sum of:
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0056185164 = product of:
0.016855549 = sum of:
0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016855549 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
-
Cwiok, J.: ¬The defining element : a discussion of the creator element within metadata schemas (2005)
0.00
0.0034496475 = product of:
0.01379859 = sum of:
0.008180073 = product of:
0.02454022 = sum of:
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0056185164 = product of:
0.016855549 = sum of:
0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016855549 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The speed with change takes place is startling and has left the information community with little time to consider how the development of electronic resources and the metadata schemas created to describe them effect how we view a work and its components. In terms of the attribution of authorship in the context of electronic works, this is a salient point. How does one determine authorship of a complex electronic resource, which is the culmination of the work of a myriad of entities? How does one determine the authorship when the content of the electronic resource may change at any moment without warning? What is the semantic content of the element that denotes authorship or responsibility for an electronic resource and how does the term used determine the element's meaning? The conceptual difficulty in the definition of the Creator element is deciphering what exactly the metadata schema should be describing. We also need to establish what purpose the element is intended to serve. In essence, we are at a crossroads. It is clear that once a work is digitized it exists in a significantly different medium, but how do we provide access to it? It is necessary to critically assess the accuracy of digital surrogates and to note that webmasters have a significant amount of intellectual responsibility invested in the sites they create. The solution to the problem in the Creator element may lie in moving from the concept of "authorship" and "origination" to a concept of intellectual responsibility. Perhaps the problematic nature of the Creator element allows us to move forward in our assessment and treatment of knowledge. One solution may be to standardize the definitions within various element sets. As the semantic web continues to grow and librarians strive to catalog electronic resources, the establishment of standard definitions for elements is becoming more relevant and important.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:13:46
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.00
0.003437012 = product of:
0.013748048 = sum of:
0.008180073 = product of:
0.02454022 = sum of:
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005567975 = product of:
0.016703924 = sum of:
0.016703924 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016703924 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.00
0.0029528649 = product of:
0.023622919 = sum of:
0.023622919 = product of:
0.07086875 = sum of:
0.07086875 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07086875 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.00
0.0027839874 = product of:
0.0222719 = sum of:
0.0222719 = product of:
0.0668157 = sum of:
0.0668157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0668157 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.00
0.0027839874 = product of:
0.0222719 = sum of:
0.0222719 = product of:
0.0668157 = sum of:
0.0668157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0668157 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Granger, S.: Metadata and digital preservation : a plea for cross-interest collaboration (2000)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.117, S.24-29
-
Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.00
0.002435989 = product of:
0.019487912 = sum of:
0.019487912 = product of:
0.058463734 = sum of:
0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058463734 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.00
0.002435989 = product of:
0.019487912 = sum of:
0.019487912 = product of:
0.058463734 = sum of:
0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058463734 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.00
0.002435989 = product of:
0.019487912 = sum of:
0.019487912 = product of:
0.058463734 = sum of:
0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058463734 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Polydoratou, P.; Nicholas, D.: Familiarity with and use of metadata formats and metadata registries amongst those working in diverse professional communities within the information sector (2001)
0.00
0.0021690698 = product of:
0.017352559 = sum of:
0.017352559 = product of:
0.052057672 = sum of:
0.052057672 = weight(_text_:problem in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052057672 = score(doc=695,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.39792046 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Metadata registries are considered to be a solution to the problem of ata sharing and standardising of information on the Internet. The International Organization for Information recognised the need for a standardised approach to this problem and produce ISO/IEC 11179 Information Technology - Specification and standardisation of data elements. As part of an ongoing research project on the ISO/IEC 11179 metadata registries implementation a questionnaire survey was carried out on four discussion lists an the EU funded SCHEMAS 2nd workshop (23-24th November 2000). Results from this survey, which was essentially aiming to identify how familiar people were with metadata and metadata registries, are presented along with a brief introduction to the ISO/IEC 11179 Information Technology - Specification and standardisation of data elements standard.
-
Turner, J.M.: ¬The organization of moving-image metadata : a research agenda (1997)
0.00
0.0021069439 = product of:
0.01685555 = sum of:
0.01685555 = product of:
0.05056665 = sum of:
0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05056665 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 3. 1.1999 12:29:24
-
Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997)
0.00
0.0021069439 = product of:
0.01685555 = sum of:
0.01685555 = product of:
0.05056665 = sum of:
0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05056665 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct./Nov., S.4-29
-
Hengel-Dittrich, C.: Im Kern einig: Dublin Core auf dem Wege zum weltweiten Standard : 7. Dublin Core Workshop in Frankfurt am Main (1999)
0.00
0.0021069439 = product of:
0.01685555 = sum of:
0.01685555 = product of:
0.05056665 = sum of:
0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05056665 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 26.12.1999 20:08:29
-
Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002)
0.00
0.0021069439 = product of:
0.01685555 = sum of:
0.01685555 = product of:
0.05056665 = sum of:
0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05056665 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
