Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983) 0.00
    0.0024581011 = product of:
      0.01966481 = sum of:
        0.01966481 = product of:
          0.058994424 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992) 0.00
    0.001789391 = product of:
      0.014315128 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Auswahlbibliographie ist in 9 Themenbereiche unterteilt. Der erste Abschnitt enthält Literatur, in der auf Abstracts und Abstracting-Verfahren allgemein eingegangen und ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung gegeben wird. Im nächsten Abschnitt werden solche Aufsätze referiert, die die historische Entwicklung des Abstracting beschreiben. Im dritten Teil sind Abstracting-Richtlinien verschiedener Institutionen aufgelistet. Lexikalische, syntaktische und semantische Textkondensierungsverfahren sind das Thema der in Abschnitt 4 präsentierten Arbeiten. Textstrukturen von Abstracts werden unter Punkt 5 betrachtet, und die Arbeiten des nächsten Themenbereiches befassen sich mit dem Problem des Schreibens von Abstracts. Der siebte Abschnitt listet sog. 'maschinelle' und maschinen-unterstützte Abstracting-Methoden auf. Anschließend werden 'maschinelle' und maschinenunterstützte Abstracting-Verfahren, Abstracts im Vergleich zu ihren Primärtexten sowie Abstracts im allgemeien bewertet. Den Abschluß bilden Bibliographien
  6. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    0.0017399922 = product of:
      0.013919937 = sum of:
        0.013919937 = product of:
          0.04175981 = sum of:
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  7. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.00
    0.0014046291 = product of:
      0.011237033 = sum of:
        0.011237033 = product of:
          0.033711098 = sum of:
            0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033711098 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  8. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0013919937 = product of:
      0.01113595 = sum of:
        0.01113595 = product of:
          0.03340785 = sum of:
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  9. Wang, F.L.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The impact analysis of language differences on an automatic multilingual text summarization system (2006) 0.00
    0.0012781365 = product of:
      0.010225092 = sum of:
        0.010225092 = product of:
          0.030675275 = sum of:
            0.030675275 = weight(_text_:problem in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030675275 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the salient features of the documents, automatic text summarization systems extract the key sentences from source documents. This process supports the users in evaluating the relevance of the extracted documents returned by information retrieval systems. Because of this tool, efficient filtering can be achieved. Indirectly, these systems help to resolve the problem of information overloading. Many automatic text summarization systems have been implemented for use with different languages. It has been established that the grammatical and lexical differences between languages have a significant effect on text processing. However, the impact of the language differences on the automatic text summarization systems has not yet been investigated. The authors provide an impact analysis of language difference on automatic text summarization. It includes the effect on the extraction processes, the scoring mechanisms, the performance, and the matching of the extracted sentences, using the parallel corpus in English and Chinese as the tested object. The analysis results provide a greater understanding of language differences and promote the future development of more advanced text summarization techniques.
  10. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0010439953 = product of:
      0.008351962 = sum of:
        0.008351962 = product of:
          0.025055885 = sum of:
            0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025055885 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  11. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0010439953 = product of:
      0.008351962 = sum of:
        0.008351962 = product of:
          0.025055885 = sum of:
            0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025055885 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  12. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0010439953 = product of:
      0.008351962 = sum of:
        0.008351962 = product of:
          0.025055885 = sum of:
            0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025055885 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  13. Ou, S.; Khoo, C.; Goh, D.H.; Heng, H.-Y.: Automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as sentence categorization (2004) 0.00
    0.0010225092 = product of:
      0.008180073 = sum of:
        0.008180073 = product of:
          0.02454022 = sum of:
            0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02454022 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction This paper reports our initial effort to develop an automatic method for parsing the discourse structure of sociology dissertation abstracts. This study is part of a broader study to develop a method for multi-document summarization. Accurate discourse parsing will make it easier to perform automatic multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts. In a previous study, we determined that the macro-level structure of dissertation abstracts typically has five sections (Khoo et al., 2002). In this study, we treated discourse parsing as a text categorization problem - assigning each sentence in a dissertation abstract to one of the five predefined sections or categories. Decision tree induction, a machine-learning method, was applied to word tokens found in the abstracts to construct a decision tree model for the categorization purpose. Decision tree induction was selected primarily because decision tree models are easy to interpret and can be converted to rules that can be incorporated in other computer programs. A well-known decision-tree induction program, C5.0 (Quinlan, 1993), was used in this study.
  14. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.00
    8.7789324E-4 = product of:
      0.007023146 = sum of:
        0.007023146 = product of:
          0.021069437 = sum of:
            0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021069437 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:19
  15. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    8.699961E-4 = product of:
      0.0069599687 = sum of:
        0.0069599687 = product of:
          0.020879906 = sum of:
            0.020879906 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020879906 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356