-
Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996)
0.01
0.008966145 = product of:
0.03586458 = sum of:
0.027436804 = product of:
0.08231041 = sum of:
0.08231041 = weight(_text_:problem in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08231041 = score(doc=27,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6291675 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008427775 = product of:
0.025283325 = sum of:
0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025283325 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system
- Date
- 9.12.1997 18:33:29
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: The homonymy problem in free text searching and the results of homonymy disambiguation
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973)
0.01
0.0055932454 = product of:
0.044745963 = sum of:
0.044745963 = product of:
0.06711894 = sum of:
0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033711098 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03340785 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 19. 3.1996 11:22:12
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
-
Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996)
0.01
0.005155518 = product of:
0.020622073 = sum of:
0.012270111 = product of:
0.03681033 = sum of:
0.03681033 = weight(_text_:problem in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03681033 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008351962 = product of:
0.025055885 = sum of:
0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025055885 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Explains briefly what constitutes the imaging process and explains how imaging can be used in information retrieval. Proposes an approach based on the concept of: 'a term is a possible world'; which enables the exploitation of term to term relationships which are estimated using an information theoretic measure. Reports results of an evaluation exercise to compare the performance of imaging retrieval, using possible world semantics, with a benchmark and using the Cranfield 2 document collection to measure precision and recall. Initially, the performance imaging retrieval was seen to be better but statistical analysis proved that the difference was not significant. The problem with imaging retrieval lies in the amount of computations needed to be performed at run time and a later experiement investigated the possibility of reducing this amount. Notes lines of further investigation
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.K.: ¬The Text REtrieval Conference (2005)
0.00
0.0043283673 = product of:
0.01731347 = sum of:
0.012397267 = product of:
0.0371918 = sum of:
0.0371918 = weight(_text_:problem in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0371918 = score(doc=5082,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.28428814 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0049162023 = product of:
0.014748606 = sum of:
0.014748606 = weight(_text_:29 in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014748606 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Text retrieval technology targets a problem that is all too familiar: finding relevant information in large stores of electronic documents. The problem is an old one, with the first research conference devoted to the subject held in 1958 [11]. Since then the problem has continued to grow as more information is created in electronic form and more people gain electronic access. The advent of the World Wide Web, where anyone can publish so everyone must search, is a graphic illustration of the need for effective retrieval technology. The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a workshop series designed to build the infrastructure necessary for the large-scale evaluation of text retrieval technology, thereby accelerating its transfer into the commercial sector. The series is sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the U.S. Department of Defense. At the time of this writing, there have been twelve TREC workshops and preparations for the thirteenth workshop are under way. Participants in the workshops have been drawn from the academic, commercial, and government sectors, and have included representatives from more than twenty different countries. These collective efforts have accomplished a great deal: a variety of large test collections have been built for both traditional ad hoc retrieval and related tasks such as cross-language retrieval, speech retrieval, and question answering; retrieval effectiveness has approximately doubled; and many commercial retrieval systems now contain technology first developed in TREC.
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Salton, G.: ¬The Smart environment for retrieval systeme valuation : advantages and problem areas (1981)
0.00
0.003578782 = product of:
0.028630257 = sum of:
0.028630257 = product of:
0.08589077 = sum of:
0.08589077 = weight(_text_:problem in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08589077 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6565352 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011)
0.00
0.0034957787 = product of:
0.02796623 = sum of:
0.02796623 = product of:
0.041949343 = sum of:
0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021069437 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
0.020879906 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020879906 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 12. 7.2011 18:29:22
-
Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997)
0.00
0.0030993167 = product of:
0.024794534 = sum of:
0.024794534 = product of:
0.0743836 = sum of:
0.0743836 = weight(_text_:problem in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0743836 = score(doc=623,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5685763 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Reports results of research to examine users conducting their initial online search on a particular information problem. Findings from 3 separate studies of relevance judgements by 44 initial search users were examined, including 2 studies of 13 end users and a study of 18 user engaged in mediated online searches. Number of items was judged on the scale 'relevant', 'patially relevant' and 'not rlevant'. Results suggest that: a relationship exists between partially rlevant items retrieved anch changes in the users' information problem or question during an information seeking process; partial relevance judgements play an important role for users in the early stages of seeking information on a particular information problem; and 'highly' relevant items may or may not be the only items useful at the early stages of users' information seeking processes
-
Hofstede, M.: Literatuur over onderwerpen zoeken in de OPC (1994)
0.00
0.0028092582 = product of:
0.022474065 = sum of:
0.022474065 = product of:
0.067422196 = sum of:
0.067422196 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067422196 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- CRI bulletin. 29(1994), Sept., S.14-15
-
Yerbury, H.; Parker, J.: Novice searchers' use of familiar structures in searching bibliographic information retrieval systems (1998)
0.00
0.0026565571 = product of:
0.021252457 = sum of:
0.021252457 = product of:
0.06375737 = sum of:
0.06375737 = weight(_text_:problem in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06375737 = score(doc=2874,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.48735106 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study of the use of metaphors as problem solving mechanisms by novice searchers of bibliographic databases. Metaphors provide a framework or 'familiar structure' of credible associations within which relationships in other domains may be considered. 28 students taking an undergraduate course in information retrieval at Sydney University of Technology, were recorded as they 'talked through' a search on a bibliographic retrieval system. The transcripts were analyzed using conventional methods and the NUDIST software package for qualitative research. A range of metaphors was apparent from the language use by students in the search process. Those which predominated were: a journey; human interaction; a building or matching process; a problem solving process, and a search for a quantity. Many of the studentes experiencing the interaction as a problem solving process or a search for quantity perceived the outcomes as successful. Concludes that when memory for operating methods and procedures is incomplete an unconscious approach through the use of a conceptual system which is consonant with the task at hand may also lead to success in bibliographic searching
-
Kazai, G.; Lalmas, M.: ¬The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation (2004)
0.00
0.002556273 = product of:
0.020450184 = sum of:
0.020450184 = product of:
0.06135055 = sum of:
0.06135055 = weight(_text_:problem in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06135055 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46895373 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Van der Walt, H.E.A.; Brakel, P.A. van: Method for the evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of a CD-ROM bibliographic database (1991)
0.00
0.0025305813 = product of:
0.02024465 = sum of:
0.02024465 = product of:
0.06073395 = sum of:
0.06073395 = weight(_text_:problem in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073395 = score(doc=3114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Addresses the problem of how potential users of CD-ROM data bases can objectively establish which version of the same data base is best suited for a specific situation. The problem was solved by applying the retrieval effectiveness of current on-line data base search systems as a standard measurement. 5 search queries from the medical sciences were presented by experienced users of MEDLINE. Search strategies were written for both DIALOG and DATA-STAR. Search results were compared to create a recall base from documents present in both on-line searches. This recall base was then used to establish the retrieval and precision of 4 CD-ROM data bases: MEDLINE, Compact Cambrdge MEDLINE, DIALOG OnDisc, Comprehensive MEDLINE/EBSCO
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬A comparative approach to system evaluation : delegating control of retrieval tests to an experimental online system (1996)
0.00
0.0025305813 = product of:
0.02024465 = sum of:
0.02024465 = product of:
0.06073395 = sum of:
0.06073395 = weight(_text_:problem in 7435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073395 = score(doc=7435,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 7435, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7435)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Describes the comparative approach to system evaluation used in this research project which delegated the administartion of an online retrieval test to an experimental online catalogue to produce data for evaluating the effectiveness of a new subject access design. Describes the methods enlisted to sort out problem test administration, e.g. to identify out-of-scope queries, incomplete system administration, and suspect post-search questionnaire responses. Covers how w the researchers handled problem search administrations and what actions they would use to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of such administrations in future online retrieval tests that delegate control of retrieval tests to online systems
-
Dunlop, M.D.; Johnson, C.W.; Reid, J.: Exploring the layers of information retrieval evaluation (1998)
0.00
0.0025305813 = product of:
0.02024465 = sum of:
0.02024465 = product of:
0.06073395 = sum of:
0.06073395 = weight(_text_:problem in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073395 = score(doc=3762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Presents current work on modelling interactive information retrieval systems and users' interactions with them. Analyzes the papers in this special issue in the context of evaluation in information retrieval (IR) by examining the different layers at which IR use could be evaluated. IR poses the double evaluation problem of evaluating both the underlying system effectiveness and the overall ability of the system to aid users. The papers look at different issues in combining human-computer interaction (HCI) research with IR research and provide insights into the problem of evaluating the information seeking process
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; McKenzie, L.; Irving, A.: Evaluative protocols for searching behaviour in online library catalogues (1991)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:52:29
-
Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Voiskunskii, V.G.: Evaluation of search results (2000)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Beaulieu, M.: Approaches to user-based studies in information seeking and retrieval : a Sheffield perspective (2003)
0.00
0.0024581011 = product of:
0.01966481 = sum of:
0.01966481 = product of:
0.058994424 = sum of:
0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058994424 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.4, S.239-248
