Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Schmitz-Esser, W."
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: How to cope with dynamism in ontologies (2000) 0.00 
    0.0012179945 = product of:
  0.009743956 = sum of:
    0.009743956 = product of:
      0.029231867 = sum of:
        0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029231867 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    3. 1.2002 13:22:08
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.; Sigel, A.: Introducing terminology-based ontologies : Papers and Materials presented by the authors at the workshop "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" (Poli/Schmitz-Esser/Sigel) at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), Vienna, Austria, July 6th, 2006 (2006) 0.00 
    0.0010534719 = product of:
  0.008427775 = sum of:
    0.008427775 = product of:
      0.025283325 = sum of:
        0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025283325 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    17. 7.2006 12:29:55
  3. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Ontologies - what are they good for, and do they help us much? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010225092 = product of:
  0.008180073 = sum of:
    0.008180073 = product of:
      0.02454022 = sum of:
        0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02454022 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Modern ontologies, what are they good for? How did they take us in KO theory and application, and what can we expect from them in the future? These were the focal questions in an afternoon workshop initiated and run by three passionate knowledge organizers from the front of ontology research, Alexander Sigel (Cologne), Winfried Schmitz-Esser (Hamburg), and Roberto Poli (Trento), at the International ISKO 06 Congress in Vienna. Those who in the knowledge organization business till the classic grounds of library and archival sciences will more and more frequently find themselves stumbling over the classic, philösophical notion of ontolögy which now comes in a modern context where nothing can be achieved any longer without the assistance of the computer. They will be asking: Ontology, what is it, a prestige-fishing, fashionable, neo-term? Old wine in new skins? Or, rather, new wine in old skins? It was clear from the beginning that in Vienna, where KO theoreticians and practitioners from all over the world were to convene, some basic explanations and clarifications, and an overview on where we stand and where we go with modern ontolögies would be most welcome, and suitable. The workshop entitled "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" aimed straight at the heart of the ontology approach in Knowledge Organization: This is an urgently needed, better command of the deep-structured conceptual matter, - beyond of the potentials and constraints of linguistics and the languages. With this, one was right in the middle of the problem that has been haunting knowledge organizers ever since up to the present day.
  4. Schmitz-Esser, W.: EXPO-INFO 2000 : Visuelles Besucherinformationssystem für Weltausstellungen (2000) 0.00 
    8.7789324E-4 = product of:
  0.007023146 = sum of:
    0.007023146 = product of:
      0.021069437 = sum of:
        0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021069437 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Rez.in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.103-104 (G.J.A. Riesthuis)

Languages

Types

Themes