Search (201 results, page 2 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01 
    0.0076457346 = product of:
  0.030582938 = sum of:
    0.030582938 = product of:
      0.061165877 = sum of:
        0.061165877 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061165877 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  2. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.0054063513 = product of:
  0.021625405 = sum of:
    0.021625405 = product of:
      0.04325081 = sum of:
        0.04325081 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04325081 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  3. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.0054063513 = product of:
  0.021625405 = sum of:
    0.021625405 = product of:
      0.04325081 = sum of:
        0.04325081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04325081 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  4. Abbasi, M. K.; Frommholz, I.: Cluster-based polyrepresentation as science modelling approach for information retrieval (2015) 0.01 
    0.0052968836 = product of:
  0.021187535 = sum of:
    0.021187535 = product of:
      0.0635626 = sum of:
        0.0635626 = weight(_text_:k in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0635626 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  6. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  7. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  8. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  9. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  10. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  11. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  12. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  13. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  14. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01 
    0.0050971564 = product of:
  0.020388626 = sum of:
    0.020388626 = product of:
      0.04077725 = sum of:
        0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077725 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  15. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.00 
    0.0049939496 = product of:
  0.019975798 = sum of:
    0.019975798 = product of:
      0.059927393 = sum of:
        0.059927393 = weight(_text_:k in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059927393 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
  16. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0049939496 = product of:
  0.019975798 = sum of:
    0.019975798 = product of:
      0.059927393 = sum of:
        0.059927393 = weight(_text_:k in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059927393 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
  17. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.00 
    0.0045052925 = product of:
  0.01802117 = sum of:
    0.01802117 = product of:
      0.03604234 = sum of:
        0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03604234 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  18. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.00 
    0.0045052925 = product of:
  0.01802117 = sum of:
    0.01802117 = product of:
      0.03604234 = sum of:
        0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03604234 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  19. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.00 
    0.0045052925 = product of:
  0.01802117 = sum of:
    0.01802117 = product of:
      0.03604234 = sum of:
        0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03604234 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  20. Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014) 0.00 
    0.0045052925 = product of:
  0.01802117 = sum of:
    0.01802117 = product of:
      0.03604234 = sum of:
        0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03604234 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26.10.2014 20:22:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 175
  • d 24
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 194
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications