Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01
    0.006371446 = product of:
      0.025485784 = sum of:
        0.025485784 = product of:
          0.050971568 = sum of:
            0.050971568 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050971568 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  2. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.01
    0.0061796973 = product of:
      0.02471879 = sum of:
        0.02471879 = product of:
          0.07415637 = sum of:
            0.07415637 = weight(_text_:k in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07415637 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017) 0.01
    0.0052968836 = product of:
      0.021187535 = sum of:
        0.021187535 = product of:
          0.0635626 = sum of:
            0.0635626 = weight(_text_:k in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635626 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.0050971564 = product of:
      0.020388626 = sum of:
        0.020388626 = product of:
          0.04077725 = sum of:
            0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077725 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.01
    0.0050971564 = product of:
      0.020388626 = sum of:
        0.020388626 = product of:
          0.04077725 = sum of:
            0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077725 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  6. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.00
    0.004460012 = product of:
      0.017840048 = sum of:
        0.017840048 = product of:
          0.035680097 = sum of:
            0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035680097 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  7. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.004460012 = product of:
      0.017840048 = sum of:
        0.017840048 = product of:
          0.035680097 = sum of:
            0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035680097 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  8. Loehrlein, A.; Jacob, E.K.; Lee, S.; Yang, K.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification (2006) 0.00
    0.004369706 = product of:
      0.017478824 = sum of:
        0.017478824 = product of:
          0.052436467 = sum of:
            0.052436467 = weight(_text_:k in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052436467 = score(doc=247,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.00
    0.003185723 = product of:
      0.012742892 = sum of:
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.00
    0.003185723 = product of:
      0.012742892 = sum of:
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.00
    0.003185723 = product of:
      0.012742892 = sum of:
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  13. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.00
    0.0017656278 = product of:
      0.007062511 = sum of:
        0.007062511 = product of:
          0.021187533 = sum of:
            0.021187533 = weight(_text_:k in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021187533 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
  15. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0011035174 = product of:
      0.0044140695 = sum of:
        0.0044140695 = product of:
          0.0132422075 = sum of:
            0.0132422075 = weight(_text_:k in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0132422075 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.098602116 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.