-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.06
0.059752483 = product of:
0.23900993 = sum of:
0.23900993 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23900993 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3189532 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.01
0.012942618 = product of:
0.025885236 = sum of:
0.010593767 = product of:
0.0317813 = sum of:
0.0317813 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0317813 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015291469 = product of:
0.030582938 = sum of:
0.030582938 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030582938 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.01
0.012942618 = product of:
0.025885236 = sum of:
0.010593767 = product of:
0.0317813 = sum of:
0.0317813 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0317813 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015291469 = product of:
0.030582938 = sum of:
0.030582938 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030582938 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011)
0.01
0.012613883 = product of:
0.025227766 = sum of:
0.012484874 = product of:
0.03745462 = sum of:
0.03745462 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745462 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012742892 = product of:
0.025485784 = sum of:
0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025485784 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:19:42
-
Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011)
0.01
0.010785515 = product of:
0.02157103 = sum of:
0.008828139 = product of:
0.026484415 = sum of:
0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026484415 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012742892 = product of:
0.025485784 = sum of:
0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025485784 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:04:21
-
Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018)
0.01
0.010785515 = product of:
0.02157103 = sum of:
0.008828139 = product of:
0.026484415 = sum of:
0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026484415 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012742892 = product of:
0.025485784 = sum of:
0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025485784 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1.11.2018 18:19:22
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.01
0.0076457346 = product of:
0.030582938 = sum of:
0.030582938 = product of:
0.061165877 = sum of:
0.061165877 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061165877 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Abbasi, M. K.; Frommholz, I.: Cluster-based polyrepresentation as science modelling approach for information retrieval (2015)
0.01
0.0052968836 = product of:
0.021187535 = sum of:
0.021187535 = product of:
0.0635626 = sum of:
0.0635626 = weight(_text_:k in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0635626 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.01
0.0050971564 = product of:
0.020388626 = sum of:
0.020388626 = product of:
0.04077725 = sum of:
0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04077725 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.0050971564 = product of:
0.020388626 = sum of:
0.020388626 = product of:
0.04077725 = sum of:
0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04077725 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.01
0.0050971564 = product of:
0.020388626 = sum of:
0.020388626 = product of:
0.04077725 = sum of:
0.04077725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04077725 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.00
0.0045052925 = product of:
0.01802117 = sum of:
0.01802117 = product of:
0.03604234 = sum of:
0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03604234 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
-
Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014)
0.00
0.0045052925 = product of:
0.01802117 = sum of:
0.01802117 = product of:
0.03604234 = sum of:
0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03604234 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.10.2014 20:22:22
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.00
0.0045052925 = product of:
0.01802117 = sum of:
0.01802117 = product of:
0.03604234 = sum of:
0.03604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03604234 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011)
0.00
0.004460012 = product of:
0.017840048 = sum of:
0.017840048 = product of:
0.035680097 = sum of:
0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035680097 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:53:00
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.00
0.004460012 = product of:
0.017840048 = sum of:
0.017840048 = product of:
0.035680097 = sum of:
0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035680097 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.00
0.004460012 = product of:
0.017840048 = sum of:
0.017840048 = product of:
0.035680097 = sum of:
0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035680097 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
Vieira, E.S.; Cabral, J.A.S.; Gomes, J.A.N.F.: Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions (2014)
0.00
0.004460012 = product of:
0.017840048 = sum of:
0.017840048 = product of:
0.035680097 = sum of:
0.035680097 = weight(_text_:22 in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035680097 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 18:22:21
-
Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017)
0.00
0.0044140695 = product of:
0.017656278 = sum of:
0.017656278 = product of:
0.05296883 = sum of:
0.05296883 = weight(_text_:k in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05296883 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011)
0.00
0.0038228673 = product of:
0.015291469 = sum of:
0.015291469 = product of:
0.030582938 = sum of:
0.030582938 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030582938 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037621226 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
