-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.011586072 = product of:
0.046344288 = sum of:
0.046344288 = product of:
0.077240475 = sum of:
0.0264534 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0264534 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.025278805 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025278805 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
12. 3.2021 18:41:28
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.0062078643 = product of:
0.024831457 = sum of:
0.024831457 = product of:
0.06207864 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.01
0.0050787074 = product of:
0.02031483 = sum of:
0.02031483 = product of:
0.050787073 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.025278805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025278805 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.00
0.0020223043 = product of:
0.008089217 = sum of:
0.008089217 = product of:
0.040446084 = sum of:
0.040446084 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040446084 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.00
0.0017874812 = product of:
0.007149925 = sum of:
0.007149925 = product of:
0.035749625 = sum of:
0.035749625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035749625 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Thelwall, M.: Directing students to new information types : a new role for Google in literature searches? (2005)
0.00
0.0017855786 = product of:
0.007142314 = sum of:
0.007142314 = product of:
0.03571157 = sum of:
0.03571157 = weight(_text_:29 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03571157 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 6.2007 16:37:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004)
0.00
0.0015872039 = product of:
0.0063488157 = sum of:
0.0063488157 = product of:
0.031744078 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:32:28
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.: Topic-based sentiment analysis for the social web : the role of mood and issue-related words (2013)
0.00
0.0015872039 = product of:
0.0063488157 = sum of:
0.0063488157 = product of:
0.031744078 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2013 13:04:26
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias : evidence and possible causes (2004)
0.00
0.001530496 = product of:
0.006121984 = sum of:
0.006121984 = product of:
0.03060992 = sum of:
0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03060992 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:30:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015)
0.00
0.001530496 = product of:
0.006121984 = sum of:
0.006121984 = product of:
0.03060992 = sum of:
0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03060992 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:29:49
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.00
0.001530496 = product of:
0.006121984 = sum of:
0.006121984 = product of:
0.03060992 = sum of:
0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03060992 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27.12.2015 11:29:37
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.00
0.0015167282 = product of:
0.006066913 = sum of:
0.006066913 = product of:
0.030334564 = sum of:
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.00
0.0015167282 = product of:
0.006066913 = sum of:
0.006066913 = product of:
0.030334564 = sum of:
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.00
0.0015167282 = product of:
0.006066913 = sum of:
0.006066913 = product of:
0.030334564 = sum of:
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Can the impact of scholarly images be assessed online? : an exploratory study using image identification technology (2010)
0.00
0.00132267 = product of:
0.00529068 = sum of:
0.00529068 = product of:
0.0264534 = sum of:
0.0264534 = weight(_text_:28 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0264534 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 11:01:25
-
Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Haustein, S.; Larivière, V.: Who reads research articles? : an altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories (2015)
0.00
0.00132267 = product of:
0.00529068 = sum of:
0.00529068 = product of:
0.0264534 = sum of:
0.0264534 = weight(_text_:28 in 2162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0264534 = score(doc=2162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2162)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 8.2015 16:52:59
-
Mohammadi , E.; Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities : research evaluation and knowledge flows (2014)
0.00
0.00132267 = product of:
0.00529068 = sum of:
0.00529068 = product of:
0.0264534 = sum of:
0.0264534 = weight(_text_:28 in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0264534 = score(doc=2190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 8.2015 16:52:34
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
-
Thelwall, M.; Prabowo, R.; Fairclough, R.: Are raw RSS feeds suitable for broad issue scanning? : a science concern case study (2006)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 6116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=6116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6116)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 21.10.2006 19:29:49
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.: Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary (2011)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4. 7.2011 19:39:29
